Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-03 04:51 UTC

OpenRouterTeam / markdown-wasm

Rust · TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 13 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Feb 2025View on GitHub ↗

OpenRouterTeam/markdown-wasm holds a health index of 35 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (58/100) and lowest on Vitality (28/100). It was last updated 412 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 44 is calibrated to 41 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

OpenRouterOrganization

3,536 followers36 public repossince Jul 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
npm	@openrouter/markdown-wasm	0.3.2	79,160	7	412 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

28At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical

Abandonment alert

Work has arrived and nobody has attended to it

no human commit in 431 daysautomated commits excludedreleases stalledOpenSSF Scorecard reports it unmaintained

Silence alone is never the finding — a small, finished library may need no commits for years. This alert requires both: no human commit for a long time, and obligations the project is visibly not discharging. Automated commits do not count as maintenance.

How abandonment is assessed

How it's scored

0/36	Push recency — last push 412 days ago
0/36	Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18	Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	0
human_commit_share	—
days_since_last_push	412
active_weeks_last_year	0

Release discipline

68Good

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 7 releases published
7.2/36	Release recency — latest release 412 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~19.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	7
latest_release_tag	v0.3.2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	412
mean_days_between_releases	19.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

46Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

19Critical

How it's scored

17.5/60	Stars — 13 stars
0/25	Forks — 2 forks
1.7/15	Watchers — 3 watchers

Inputs used

forks	2
stars	13
watchers	3
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

82Excellent

How it's scored

65.3/80	Monthly downloads — 79,160 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	@openrouter/markdown-wasm
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	79,160
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

43Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	1
top_contributor_share	1

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical

How it's scored

0/42	Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30	PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	0
open_issues	0
closed_issues	0
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	—
closed_unmerged_prs	0
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

91Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25	Owner reach — 3,536 followers of OpenRouterTeam
17.5/25	Track record — 36 public repos, account ~3 yr old

Inputs used

followers	3,536
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	OpenRouterTeam
public_repos	36
account_age_days	1,117

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

79Good

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
14/35	Publish recency — latest publish 412 days ago
20/20	Version history — 7 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	@openrouter/markdown-wasm
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	412

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

60Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

55Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://www.npmjs.com/package/@openrouter/markdown-wasm
0/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://www.npmjs.com/package/@openrouter/markdown-wasm
docs_site	https://www.npmjs.com/package/@openrouter/markdown-wasm
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	no

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

45Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

31At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 63 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	3.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	63
affected_packages	12
assessed_packages	191
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 2, high 7, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 191 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40	Legible commit history — no data

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	—
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

68Good

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8	Automated maintenance — no data
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Cargo.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	—
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/3 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	9,028
source_files_sampled	3
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

13GitHub stars

1contributors

0commits, last 12 months

412days since last push

7releases

1bus factor

0open issues

crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch crates package 'openrouter-markdown' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿

0Stars

2Forks

1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 0Patch 1

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.1 / 10

3.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-03 04:51 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
9	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	63 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 8

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	lazy_static	`1.5.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	pulldown-cmark	`0.12.2`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	pulldown-cmark-escape	`0.11.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	regex-lite	`0.1.6`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	wasm-bindgen	`0.2.100`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde	`1.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde-wasm-bindgen	`0.4`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	tsify	`0.4.5`	Cargo.toml

All dependencies 191

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 182 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	lazy_static	`1.5.0`	direct
crates.io	pulldown-cmark	`0.12.2`	direct
crates.io	pulldown-cmark-escape	`0.11.0`	direct
crates.io	regex-lite	`0.1.6`	direct
crates.io	serde	`1.0.217`	direct
crates.io	serde-wasm-bindgen	`0.4.5`	direct
crates.io	serde-wasm-bindgen	`0.5.0`	direct
crates.io	tsify	`0.4.5`	direct
crates.io	wasm-bindgen	`0.2.100`	direct
crates.io	bitflags	`2.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	bumpalo	`3.17.0`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	js-sys	`0.3.77`	indirect
crates.io	log	`0.4.25`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.7.4`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.20.3`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.93`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.38`	indirect
crates.io	rustversion	`1.0.19`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.217`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive_internals	`0.28.0`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.98`	indirect
crates.io	tsify-macros	`0.4.5`	indirect
crates.io	unicase	`2.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.16`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-backend	`0.2.100`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro	`0.2.100`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro-support	`0.2.100`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-shared	`0.2.100`	indirect
npm	@cspotcode/source-map-support	`0.8.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.8`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/set-array	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/source-map	`0.3.6`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.25`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.9`	indirect
npm	@rollup/plugin-virtual	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loongarch64-gnu	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-powerpc64le-gnu	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	@swc/core	`1.10.16`	indirect
npm	@swc/core-darwin-arm64	`1.10.16`	indirect
npm	@swc/core-darwin-x64	`1.10.16`	indirect
npm	@swc/core-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.10.16`	indirect
npm	@swc/core-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.10.16`	indirect
npm	@swc/core-linux-arm64-musl	`1.10.16`	indirect
npm	@swc/core-linux-x64-gnu	`1.10.16`	indirect
npm	@swc/core-linux-x64-musl	`1.10.16`	indirect
npm	@swc/core-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.10.16`	indirect
npm	@swc/core-win32-ia32-msvc	`1.10.16`	indirect
npm	@swc/core-win32-x64-msvc	`1.10.16`	indirect
npm	@swc/counter	`0.1.3`	indirect
npm	@swc/types	`0.1.17`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/node10	`1.0.11`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/node12	`1.0.11`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/node14	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/node16	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`22.13.4`	indirect
npm	@vitest/expect	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@vitest/mocker	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@vitest/pretty-format	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@vitest/runner	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@vitest/snapshot	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@vitest/spy	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@vitest/utils	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.14.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-walk	`8.3.4`	indirect
npm	arg	`4.1.3`	indirect
npm	assertion-error	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	axios	`0.26.1`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	binary-install	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect
npm	buffer-from	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	cac	`6.7.14`	indirect
npm	chai	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	check-error	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	chownr	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	commander	`2.20.3`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	create-require	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	cross-env	`7.0.3`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.0`	indirect
npm	deep-eql	`5.0.2`	indirect
npm	diff	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	es-module-lexer	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.24.2`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	expect-type	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	follow-redirects	`1.15.9`	indirect
npm	fs-minipass	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.2.3`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	loupe	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.17`	indirect
npm	make-error	`1.3.6`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	minipass	`3.3.6`	indirect
npm	minipass	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	minizlib	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	mkdirp	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.8`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	path-is-absolute	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	pathe	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	pathval	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.2`	indirect
npm	rimraf	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.34.8`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	siginfo	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-support	`0.5.21`	indirect
npm	stackback	`0.0.2`	indirect
npm	std-env	`3.8.0`	indirect
npm	tar	`6.2.1`	indirect
npm	terser	`5.39.0`	indirect
npm	tinybench	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	tinyexec	`0.3.2`	indirect
npm	tinypool	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	tinyrainbow	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	tinyspy	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	ts-node	`10.9.2`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.7.3`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`6.20.0`	indirect
npm	uuid	`10.0.0`	indirect
npm	v8-compile-cache-lib	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	vite	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	vite-node	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	vite-plugin-top-level-await	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	vite-plugin-wasm	`3.4.1`	indirect
npm	vitest	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	wasm-pack	`0.13.1`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	why-is-node-running	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	yallist	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	yn	`3.1.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 12

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 191 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 12 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
rollup	`4.34.8`	indirect	critical	1	`4.59.0`
vitest	`3.0.5`	indirect	critical	1	`4.1.0`
axios	`0.26.1`	indirect	high	23	`1.18.0`
brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect	high	4	`5.0.8`
minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
postcss	`8.5.2`	indirect	high	3	`8.5.18`
tar	`6.2.1`	indirect	high	12	`7.5.21`
uuid	`10.0.0`	indirect	high	1	`13.0.1`
vite	`6.1.0`	indirect	high	12	`8.0.16`
diff	`4.0.2`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.0.3`
esbuild	`0.24.2`	indirect	moderate	1	`0.25.0`
follow-redirects	`1.15.9`	indirect	moderate	1	`1.16.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records