Public record
Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 18:07 UTC

PHP-CMSIG / seal-elasticsearch-adapter

An adapter to support Elasticsearch in CMS-IG SEAL search abstraction. Part of the https://github.com/php-cmsig/search project. READ-ONLY Repository

PHPMIT★ 1 star⑂ 1 forksince Dec 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#elasticsearch#php#seal-adapter#search-client#elasticsearch-php#seal-php-adapter#cmsig

PHP-CMSIG/seal-elasticsearch-adapter holds a health index of 51 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (75/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (33/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

51
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

51
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 51 is calibrated to 51 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

PHP CMSIGOrganization
15 followers20 public repossince Dec 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistcmsig/seal-elasticsearch-adapter0.12.1410,3903244 days agoelasticsearchsealseal-adaptersearch-clientcmsigcmsig-seal-adapter

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

66Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
13.8/36Commit cadence — 20/52 weeks with commits
13.6/18Commit volume — 32 commits in the last year
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
commits_last_year32
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year20

Release discipline

88Excellent
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 32 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 44 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~23.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count32
latest_release_tag0.12.14
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release44
mean_days_between_releases23.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars1
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

61Moderate
How it's scored
53.6/80Monthly downloads — 10,390 downloads/month across packagist
7.4/20Registry dependents — 12 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagescmsig/seal-elasticsearch-adapter
dependents12
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads22,204
monthly_downloads10,390
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

32At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 91% of commits
10.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 8 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 19 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled8
top_contributor_share0.91

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — 0/1 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

74Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
8.7/25Owner reach — 15 followers of PHP-CMSIG
20.8/25Track record — 20 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers15
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginPHP-CMSIG
public_repos20
account_age_days2,042
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 44 days ago
20/20Version history — 32 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescmsig/seal-elasticsearch-adapter
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish44

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

50Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicselasticsearch, php, seal-adapter, search-client, elasticsearch-php, seal-php-adapter, cmsig
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

33At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 19 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
2.2/7.5Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories7
affected_packages2
assessed_packages53
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 53 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

46Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 90 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.9
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

48Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/12 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes12,829
source_files_sampled12
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1GitHub stars
8contributors
32commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
32releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 18:07 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 19 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
3Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistcmsig/seal^0.12composer.json
Packagistelasticsearch/elasticsearch^8.5.3 || ^9.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/container^1.0 || ^2.0composer.json
All dependencies 53

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 50 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistcmsig/seal 0.12-dev.0direct
Packagistelasticsearch/elasticsearch 9.4-dev.0direct
Packagistpsr/container 2.0-dev.0direct
Packagistclue/stream-filter 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistelastic/transport 9-dev.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr7 2.13-dev.0indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser 5-dev.0indirect
Packagistopen-telemetry/api1.10.0indirect
Packagistopen-telemetry/context1.5.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest 2.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-cs-fixer/shim3.95.15indirect
Packagistphp-http/curl-client 2-dev.0indirect
Packagistphp-http/discovery 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistphp-http/httplug 2-dev.0indirect
Packagistphp-http/message 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistphp-http/promise 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installer 1.4-dev.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan 2.2-dev.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit 2.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage10.1.16indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator4.1.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker4.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template3.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer6.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit 10.5-dev.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client 1.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message 2.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log 3-dev.0indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistrector/rector2.5.7indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser2.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit 2.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup 3.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator5.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity3.2.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff5.1.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment6.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter5.1.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state6.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code2.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector3.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context5.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/type4.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/version4.0.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7-devindirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver 8.2-dev.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php80 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php82 1-dev.0indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.3.1indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 53 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
phpunit/phpunit 10.5-dev.0indirecthigh112.5.8
guzzlehttp/psr7 2.13-dev.0indirectmoderate62.12.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with PHP-CMSIG/seal-elasticsearch-adapter. Read them side by side →

96elastic/elasticsearch-phpOfficial PHP client for Elasticsearch.Exceptional99taskforcesh/bullmqBullMQ - Message Queue and Batch processing for NodeJS, Python, .NET, Elixir, Rust and PHP based on Redis or PostgreSQLExceptional98line/line-bot-sdk-phpLINE Messaging API SDK for PHPExceptional98api-platform/coreThe server component of API Platform: hypermedia and GraphQL APIs in minutesExceptional98symfony/symfonyThe Symfony PHP frameworkExceptional98infection/infectionPHP Mutation Testing libraryExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.