Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 16:57 UTC

PayPlus-Gateway / PayPlusHostedFields

TypeScriptNo license detected★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2023View on GitHub ↗

PayPlus-Gateway/PayPlusHostedFields holds a health index of 26 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (50/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (1/100). It was last updated 33 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

26
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

26
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 32 is calibrated to 26 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

PayPlusOrganization
1 follower11 public repossince Jul 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npmpayplus-hosted-fieldspoints to another repo — not scored1.4.43,6491433 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

50Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 33 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence1/52 weeks with commits
6.3/18Commit volume4 commits in the last year
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
commits_last_year4
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push33
active_weeks_last_year1
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases7 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 33 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~187.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count7
latest_release_tagv1.4.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release33
mean_days_between_releases187.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

1Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

42Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 88% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.875
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance1/1 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach1 followers of PayPlus-Gateway
18.2/25Track record11 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginPayPlus-Gateway
public_repos11
account_age_days1,892

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

18Critical · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

10Critical
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

45Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0/2.5Licenselicense file not detected
2.2/7.5Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
0/5Packagingno data
1.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities17 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages32
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:payplus-hosted-fields@1.4.4 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 32 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

30At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
1.7/40Legible commit history1 of 32 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.031
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 32
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/9 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes24,626
source_files_sampled9
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
2contributors
4commits, last 12 months
33days since last push
7releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • npm package 'payplus-hosted-fields' points at a different repository (https://github.com/PayplusPayment/PayPlusHostedFields); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.1 / 10
3.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 16:57 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
3Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities17 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmlodash^4.17.21package.json
npmpath^0.12.7package.json
npmprocess^0.11.10package.json
npmterser-webpack-plugin^5.3.8package.json
All dependencies 139

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 135 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmlodash4.17.21direct
npmpath0.12.7direct
npmprocess0.11.10direct
npmterser-webpack-plugin5.3.8direct
npm@discoveryjs/json-ext0.5.7indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.3indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/set-array1.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/source-map0.3.3indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.4.14indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.18indirect
npm@types/eslint8.37.0indirect
npm@types/eslint-scope3.7.4indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.1indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.11indirect
npm@types/lodash4.14.194indirect
npm@types/node20.1.4indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/ast1.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/floating-point-hex-parser1.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-api-error1.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-buffer1.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-numbers1.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-wasm-bytecode1.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-wasm-section1.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/ieee7541.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/leb1281.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/utf81.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-edit1.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-gen1.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-opt1.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-parser1.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wast-printer1.11.6indirect
npm@webpack-cli/configtest2.1.0indirect
npm@webpack-cli/info2.0.1indirect
npm@webpack-cli/serve2.0.4indirect
npm@xtuc/ieee7541.2.0indirect
npm@xtuc/long4.2.2indirect
npmacorn8.8.2indirect
npmacorn-import-assertions1.9.0indirect
npmajv6.12.6indirect
npmajv-keywords3.5.2indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmbraces3.0.2indirect
npmbrowserslist4.21.5indirect
npmbuffer-from1.1.2indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001487indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmchrome-trace-event1.0.3indirect
npmclone-deep4.0.1indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcolorette2.0.20indirect
npmcommander10.0.1indirect
npmcommander2.20.3indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.3indirect
npmelectron-to-chromium1.4.394indirect
npmenhanced-resolve5.14.0indirect
npmenvinfo7.8.1indirect
npmes-module-lexer1.2.1indirect
npmescalade3.1.1indirect
npmeslint-scope5.1.1indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmevents3.3.0indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfastest-levenshtein1.0.16indirect
npmfill-range7.0.1indirect
npmfind-up4.1.0indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.1indirect
npmglob-to-regexp0.4.1indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhas1.0.3indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmimport-local3.1.0indirect
npminherits2.0.3indirect
npminterpret3.1.1indirect
npmis-core-module2.12.0indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-plain-object2.0.4indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmisobject3.0.1indirect
npmjest-worker27.5.1indirect
npmjson-parse-even-better-errors2.3.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmkind-of6.0.3indirect
npmloader-runner4.3.0indirect
npmlocate-path5.0.0indirect
npmlru-cache6.0.0indirect
npmmerge-stream2.0.0indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.5indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmneo-async2.6.2indirect
npmnode-releases2.0.10indirect
npmp-limit2.3.0indirect
npmp-locate4.1.0indirect
npmp-try2.2.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpicocolors1.0.0indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpkg-dir4.2.0indirect
npmpunycode2.3.0indirect
npmrandombytes2.1.0indirect
npmrechoir0.8.0indirect
npmresolve1.22.2indirect
npmresolve-cwd3.0.0indirect
npmresolve-from5.0.0indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmschema-utils3.1.2indirect
npmsemver7.5.1indirect
npmserialize-javascript6.0.1indirect
npmshallow-clone3.0.1indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsource-map-support0.5.21indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmtapable2.2.1indirect
npmterser5.17.3indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmts-loader9.4.2indirect
npmtypescript5.0.4indirect
npmupdate-browserslist-db1.0.11indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmutil0.10.4indirect
npmwatchpack2.4.0indirect
npmwebpack5.82.1indirect
npmwebpack-cli5.1.1indirect
npmwebpack-merge5.8.0indirect
npmwebpack-sources3.2.3indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwildcard2.0.1indirect
npmyallist4.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:payplus-hosted-fields@1.4.4 pulls in 32 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.