Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-05 09:39 UTC

Pollora / colt

Use WordPress backend with Laravel or any PHP application

PHPCustom license★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Feb 2025forkView on GitHub ↗

Pollora/colt holds a health index of 41 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (61/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (19/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

41
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

41
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 44 is calibrated to 41 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

PolloraOrganization
4 followers28 public repossince Oct 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistpollora/colt10.0.03,2902168 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

53Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
2.7/18Commit volume — 1 commits in the last year
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
commits_last_year1
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year1
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 2 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~168.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count2
latest_release_tag10.0.1
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases168.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

19Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
46.9/80Monthly downloads — 3,290 downloads/month across packagist
2/20Registry dependents — 1 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagespollora/colt
dependents1
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads7,850
monthly_downloads3,290
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 77% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 53 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 14 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled53
top_contributor_share0.77
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance — 1/1 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
5/25Owner reach — 4 followers of Pollora
14.6/25Track record — 28 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers4
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginPollora
public_repos28
account_age_days713
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 168 days ago
12/20Version history — 2 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespollora/colt
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish168

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

43Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://pollora.dev
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicseloquent, laravel, pollora, wordpress
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://pollora.dev
docs_sitehttps://pollora.dev
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

40Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
0.8/7.5Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 45 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate2.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories45
affected_packages13
assessed_packages120
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 6, moderate 6, low 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 120 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

37Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://pollora.dev/llms.txt)
20.3/40Legible commit history — 38 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://pollora.dev/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.38
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/94 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes20,558
source_files_sampled94
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
53contributors
1commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
2releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.5 / 10
2.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-05 09:39 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
1Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities45 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistilluminate/database^12.0 || ^13.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/filesystem^12.0 || ^13.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/support^12.0 || ^13.0composer.json
Packagistfakerphp/faker^1.19composer.json
Packagistbordoni/phpass0.3.*composer.json
Packagistthunderer/shortcode^0.7.3composer.json
All dependencies 120

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 117 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistbordoni/phpass0.3.6direct
Packagistfakerphp/faker1.24.1direct
Packagistthunderer/shortcode0.7.6direct
Packagistbrick/math0.12.2indirect
Packagistcarbonphp/carbon-doctrine-types3.2.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.3indirect
Packagistdflydev/dot-access-data3.0.3indirect
Packagistdoctrine/inflector2.0.10indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer3.0.1indirect
Packagistdragonmantank/cron-expression3.4.0indirect
Packagistegulias/email-validator4.0.3indirect
Packagistfilp/whoops2.17.0indirect
Packagistfruitcake/php-cors1.3.0indirect
Packagistgraham-campbell/result-type1.1.3indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.9.2indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises2.0.4indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.7.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/uri-template1.0.4indirect
Packagisthamcrest/hamcrest-php2.0.1indirect
Packagistlaravel/framework12.0.1indirect
Packagistlaravel/legacy-factories1.4.1indirect
Packagistlaravel/pail1.2.2indirect
Packagistlaravel/prompts0.3.5indirect
Packagistlaravel/serializable-closure2.0.3indirect
Packagistlaravel/tinker2.10.1indirect
Packagistleague/commonmark2.6.1indirect
Packagistleague/config1.2.0indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem3.29.1indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem-local3.29.0indirect
Packagistleague/mime-type-detection1.16.0indirect
Packagistleague/uri7.5.1indirect
Packagistleague/uri-interfaces7.5.0indirect
Packagistmockery/mockery1.6.12indirect
Packagistmonolog/monolog3.8.1indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.13.0indirect
Packagistnesbot/carbon3.8.6indirect
Packagistnette/schema1.3.2indirect
Packagistnette/utils4.0.5indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.4.0indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/collision8.6.1indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/termwind2.3.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/canvas10.0.1indirect
Packagistorchestra/canvas-core10.0.1indirect
Packagistorchestra/sidekick1.0.4indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench10.0.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench-core10.0.2indirect
Packagistorchestra/workbench10.0.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpoption/phpoption1.9.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage11.0.9indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator5.1.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker5.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template4.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer7.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit11.5.10indirect
Packagistpsr/clock1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.3indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/simple-cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistpsy/psysh0.12.7indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistramsey/collection2.0.0indirect
Packagistramsey/uuid4.7.6indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser3.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit3.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator6.3.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff6.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment7.2.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter6.3.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state7.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code3.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator6.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context6.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/type5.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/version5.0.2indirect
Packagiststaabm/side-effects-detector1.0.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/clock7.2.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/console7.2.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selector7.2.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.5.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/error-handler7.2.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher7.2.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.5.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder7.2.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation7.2.3indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel7.2.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/mailer7.2.3indirect
Packagistsymfony/mime7.2.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-idn1.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php831.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php841.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-uuid1.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process7.2.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/routing7.2.3indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.5.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/string7.2.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/thanks1.4.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation7.2.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation-contracts3.5.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/uid7.2.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper7.2.3indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml7.2.3indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.2.3indirect
Packagisttijsverkoyen/css-to-inline-styles2.3.0indirect
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv5.6.1indirect
Packagistvoku/portable-ascii2.0.3indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.11.0indirect
Dependency advisories 13

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 120 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 13 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
guzzlehttp/guzzle7.9.2indirecthigh98.0.1
laravel/framework12.0.1indirecthigh413.30.0
league/commonmark2.6.1indirecthigh142.10.2
phpunit/phpunit11.5.10indirecthigh112.5.8
symfony/http-foundation7.2.3indirecthigh28.0.13
symfony/mailer7.2.3indirecthigh18.0.12
guzzlehttp/psr72.7.0indirectmoderate42.12.3
psy/psysh0.12.7indirectmoderate10.12.19
symfony/mime7.2.4indirectmoderate28.0.12
symfony/polyfill-intl-idn1.31.0indirectmoderate11.38.1
symfony/routing7.2.3indirectmoderate28.0.13
symfony/yaml7.2.3indirectmoderate38.0.12
league/flysystem3.29.1indirectlow13.35.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.