Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 09:30 UTC

Polymarket / py-sdk

Unified Python SDK for Polymarket DeFi

PythonMIT★ 121 stars⑂ 28 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗

Polymarket/py-sdk holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (88/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (64/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

92
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

PolymarketOrganization · verified domain
2,405 followers102 public repossince Sep 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIpolymarket-client0.9.057,959336 days agoclientpolymarketprediction-marketstradingweb3

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
13.2/36Commit cadence — 19/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 650 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year650
human_commit_share0.93
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year19
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 33 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 6 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count33
latest_release_tagpolymarket-client-v0.9.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
33.7/60Stars — 121 stars
11.9/25Forks — 28 forks
3.3/15Watchers — 5 watchers
Inputs used
forks28
stars121
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
63.5/80Monthly downloads — 57,959 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespolymarket-client
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads57,959
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 54% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 7 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.543
How it's scored
34.3/42Issue resolution — 82% of issues closed
25.2/30PR acceptance — 191/227 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs191
open_issues11
closed_issues49
prs_merged_7d3
prs_decided_7d5
prs_merged_30d15
prs_decided_30d18
issue_closed_ratio0.817
closed_unmerged_prs36
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
24.3/25Owner reach — 2,405 followers of Polymarket
25/25Track record — 102 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,405
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginPolymarket
public_repos102
account_age_days3,291

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 6 days ago
20/20Version history — 33 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespolymarket-client
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish6

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.polymarket.com
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.polymarket.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

79Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
3.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate7.4

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages33
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:polymarket-client@0.9.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 33 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

88Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 89 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.957
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes10,601
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — src/polymarket/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/polymarket/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/polymarket/py.typed)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes — 2/367 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes144,067
source_files_sampled367
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

121GitHub stars
7contributors
650commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
33releases
1bus factor
11open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • pypi download statistics for 'polymarket-client' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
  • pypi download figures for polymarket-client carried forward from the previous scan (stats endpoint unavailable this scan)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 28 ⇿
0Stars
28Forks
31Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0510152025302822026-052026-072026-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 7.4 / 10
7.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 09:30 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIeth-abi>=5,<6pyproject.toml
PyPIeth-account>=0.13,<1pyproject.toml
PyPIeth-utils>=4,<6pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.27,<1pyproject.toml
PyPImsgpack>=1,<2pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2,<3pyproject.toml
PyPIwebsockets>=13,<16pyproject.toml
All dependencies 78

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 71 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIeth-abi5.2.0direct
PyPIeth-account0.13.7direct
PyPIeth-utils5.3.1direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPImsgpack1.2.1direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.3direct
PyPIwebsockets15.0.1direct
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.13.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbitarray3.8.1indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.4.22indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.9indirect
PyPIckzg2.1.7indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.13.5indirect
PyPIcytoolz1.1.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIeth-hash0.8.0indirect
PyPIeth-keyfile0.8.1indirect
PyPIeth-keys0.7.0indirect
PyPIeth-rlp2.2.0indirect
PyPIeth-typing6.0.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIh24.3.0indirect
PyPIhexbytes1.3.1indirect
PyPIhpack4.1.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhyperframe6.1.0indirect
PyPIidna3.16indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.6indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpandas2.3.3indirect
PyPIparsimonious0.10.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpolars1.41.2indirect
PyPIpolars-runtime-321.41.2indirect
PyPIpolymarket-client0.9.0indirect
PyPIpyarrow21.0.0indirect
PyPIpycryptodome3.23.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.3indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyright1.1.409indirect
PyPIpytest8.4.2indirect
PyPIpytest-cov6.3.0indirect
PyPIpytest-watcher0.6.3indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpytz2026.2indirect
PyPIregex2026.4.4indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrespx0.23.1indirect
PyPIrlp4.1.0indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIruff0.15.12indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.1.1indirect
PyPIsphinx9.0.4indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItoolz1.1.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2026.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:polymarket-client@0.9.0 pulls in 33 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.