Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 05:12 UTC

PowerShell / PSResourceGet

PSResourceGet is the package manager for PowerShell

C# · PowerShellMIT★ 578 stars⑂ 114 forkssince Mar 2020View on GitHub ↗

PowerShell/PSResourceGet holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Security (90/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (63/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 80 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

PowerShell TeamOrganization · verified domain
5,240 followers106 public repossince Mar 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence — 21/52 weeks with commits
16.9/18Commit volume — 75 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 18 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year75
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year21
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 25 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 151 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~34.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count25
latest_release_tagv1.3.0-preview1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release151
mean_days_between_releases34.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

80Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
44.8/60Stars — 578 stars
17.1/25Forks — 114 forks
7.8/15Watchers — 26 watchers
Inputs used
forks114
stars578
watchers26
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

80Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 44% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 38 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled38
top_contributor_share0.436
How it's scored
31/42Issue resolution — 74% of issues closed
23.4/30PR acceptance — 801/1,027 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs801
open_issues250
closed_issues701
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.737
closed_unmerged_prs226
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 5,240 followers of PowerShell
25/25Track record — 106 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers5,240
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginPowerShell
public_repos106
account_age_days4,233

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

73Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 23 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.powershellgallery.com/packages/Microsoft.PowerShell.PSResourceGet
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspowershellget, packagemanagement, powershell, powershell-module, psresourceget
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.powershellgallery.com/packages/Microsoft.PowerShell.PSResourceGet
docs_sitehttps://www.powershellgallery.com/packages/Microsoft.PowerShell.PSResourceGet
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

90Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

88Excellent
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 23 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 18 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
4.5/5SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate8.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages16
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 16 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
33.1/40Legible commit history — 62 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.62
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/code/Microsoft.PowerShell.PSResourceGet.csproj, test/perf/benchmarks/benchmarks.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/code/Microsoft.PowerShell.PSResourceGet.csproj, test/perf/benchmarks/benchmarks.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
48.3/55Manageable file sizes — 8/66 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes111,324
source_files_sampled66
oversized_source_files8
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

578GitHub stars
38contributors
75commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
25releases
2bus factor
250open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 114 ⇿
0Stars
114Forks
25Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02040608010012011132020-032023-062026-09
Major 1Minor 2Patch 7

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.8 / 10
8.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 05:12 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9CI-Tests23 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained18 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
9SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetNuGet.Commands6.14.3src/code/Microsoft.PowerShell.PSResourceGet.csproj
NuGetNuGet.Common6.14.3src/code/Microsoft.PowerShell.PSResourceGet.csproj
NuGetNuGet.Configuration6.14.3src/code/Microsoft.PowerShell.PSResourceGet.csproj
NuGetNuGet.Packaging6.14.3src/code/Microsoft.PowerShell.PSResourceGet.csproj
NuGetNuGet.ProjectModel6.14.3src/code/Microsoft.PowerShell.PSResourceGet.csproj
NuGetNuGet.Protocol6.14.3src/code/Microsoft.PowerShell.PSResourceGet.csproj
NuGetPowerShellStandard.Library7.0.0-preview.1src/code/Microsoft.PowerShell.PSResourceGet.csproj
NuGetSystem.Net.Http4.3.4src/code/Microsoft.PowerShell.PSResourceGet.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Json8.0.6src/code/Microsoft.PowerShell.PSResourceGet.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CSharp4.7.0src/code/Microsoft.PowerShell.PSResourceGet.csproj
NuGetAzure.Identity1.17.2src/code/Microsoft.PowerShell.PSResourceGet.csproj
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.6.1src/code/Microsoft.PowerShell.PSResourceGet.csproj
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Pkcs6.0.5src/code/Microsoft.PowerShell.PSResourceGet.csproj
All dependencies 16

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 3 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAzure.Identity1.17.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CSharp4.7.0direct
NuGetNuGet.Commands6.14.3direct
NuGetNuGet.Common6.14.3direct
NuGetNuGet.Configuration6.14.3direct
NuGetNuGet.Packaging6.14.3direct
NuGetNuGet.ProjectModel6.14.3direct
NuGetNuGet.Protocol6.14.3direct
NuGetPowerShellStandard.Library7.0.0-preview.1direct
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.6.1direct
NuGetSystem.Net.Http4.3.4direct
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Pkcs6.0.5direct
NuGetSystem.Text.Json8.0.6direct
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.13.12indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet.Diagnostics.Windows0.13.12indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.PowerShell.SDK7.4.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 16 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.