Public record
Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-04 17:14 UTC

SteveGilham / altcover

Cross-platform coverage gathering and processing tool set for dotnet/.Net Framework and Mono

F#MIT★ 531 stars⑂ 22 forkssince Dec 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#mono#code-coverage#dotnet-framework#dotnet-core#testing#cross-platform#powershell-module#powershell#coverage#dotnet#dotnet-standard

SteveGilham/altcover holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (78/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (55/100). It was last updated 12 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Steve GilhamPersonal account
56 followers27 public repossince May 2014

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetaltcover.cake9.0.102-3265 days agocodecoveragecake

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

68Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

71Good
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 12 days ago
15.2/36Commit cadence — 22/52 weeks with commits
16.6/18Commit volume — 69 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year69
human_commit_share0.87
days_since_last_push12
active_weeks_last_year22

Release discipline

63Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 265 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~65 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagrelease/v9.0.102
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release265
mean_days_between_releases65

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

61Moderate
How it's scored
44.2/60Stars — 531 stars
11/25Forks — 22 forks
5.8/15Watchers — 12 watchers
Inputs used
forks22
stars531
watchers12
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescoveralls.io, github.com
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

58Moderate
How it's scored
46.6/80Total downloads — 30,626 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesaltcover.cake
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads30,626
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

14Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.999

Issue & PR responsiveness

79Good
How it's scored
41.2/42Issue resolution — 98% of issues closed
27.3/30PR acceptance — 40/44 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs40
open_issues4
closed_issues192
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.98
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

56Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12.6/25Owner reach — 56 followers of SteveGilham
22.5/25Track record — 27 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers56
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginSteveGilham
public_repos27
account_age_days4,477
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

83Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 265 days ago
12/20Version history — 3 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesaltcover.cake
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish265

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

74Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 11 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsmono, code-coverage, dotnet-framework, dotnet-core, testing, cross-platform, powershell-module, powershell, coverage, dotnet, dotnet-standard
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

48Weak
How it's scored
0/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
2.5/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 5
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
6/7.5Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages2
assessed_packages24
unassessed_packages79
affected_by_severityhigh 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 24 resolved dependencies against OSV. 79 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

9Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
8.6/40Legible commit history — 14 of 87 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.161
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

56Moderate
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — AltCover.Async/AltCover.Async.csproj, AltCover.Base/AltCover.Base.csproj, AltCover.Cake/AltCover.Cake.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — F# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 13 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifestsAltCover.Async/AltCover.Async.csproj, AltCover.Base/AltCover.Base.csproj, AltCover.Cake/AltCover.Cake.csproj, AltCover.DataCollector/AltCover.DataCollector.csproj, AltCover.FontSupport/AltCover.FontSupport.csproj, AltCover.Monitor/AltCover.Monitor.csproj, AltCover.Recorder/AltCover.Recorder.csproj, AltCover.UICommon/progress_16x/ConsoleApp1.csproj, Build/NuGet.csproj, Demo/Echo/Echo/Echo.csproj, Demo/Echo/Test/Test.csproj, Demo/inspector/inspector.csproj, Demo/xunit-dotnet/xunit-dotnet.csproj, RegressionTesting/issue156/ClassLibrary1/ClassLibrary1.csproj, RegressionTesting/issue156/Tests/Tests.csproj, RegressionTesting/issue20/classlib/classlib.csproj, Samples/Sample0/Sample0.csproj, Samples/Sample1/Sample1.csproj, Samples/Sample10/Sample10.csproj, Samples/Sample11/Sample11.csproj, Samples/Sample12/Sample12.csproj, Samples/Sample14/Sample14/Sample14.csproj, Samples/Sample16/Sample16.csproj, Samples/Sample16/Test/Test/Test.csproj, Samples/Sample20/Test.csproj, Samples/Sample21/Sample21.csproj, Samples/Sample23/Sample23.csproj, Samples/Sample24/Sample24.csproj, Samples/Sample25/Sample25.csproj, Samples/Sample28/GeneratedDemo/CSharpGeneratedDemo.csproj, Samples/Sample28/SourceGeneratorSamples/CSharpSourceGeneratorSamples.csproj, Samples/Sample3/Sample3.csproj, Samples/Sample32/Sample32.csproj, Samples/Sample5/Sample5.csproj, Samples/Sample8/Sample8.csproj, Samples/Sample9/sample9.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.13

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — F# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/94 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageF#
largest_source_bytes28,033
source_files_sampled94
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

531GitHub stars
4contributors
69commits, last 12 months
12days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
4open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 22 ⇿
0Stars
22Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

048121620242222018-012022-042026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-04 17:14 UTC

0Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained12 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 5
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 17
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMono.Cecil—AltCover.Base/AltCover.Base.csproj
NuGetCake.Common—AltCover.Cake/AltCover.Cake.csproj
NuGetCake.Core—AltCover.Cake/AltCover.Cake.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.TestPlatform.ObjectModel—AltCover.DataCollector/AltCover.DataCollector.csproj
NuGetFake.Core.Process—AltCover.FontSupport/AltCover.FontSupport.csproj
NuGetBlackFox.CommandLine—Build/NuGet.csproj
NuGetNuGet.CommandLine—Build/NuGet.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector—Build/NuGet.csproj
NuGetILRepack—Build/NuGet.csproj
NuGetMono.Options—Build/NuGet.csproj
NuGetNUnit.ConsoleRunner—Build/NuGet.csproj
NuGetOpenCover—Build/NuGet.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.console—Build/NuGet.csproj
NuGetPester—Build/NuGet.csproj
NuGetAltCode.Dixon—Build/NuGet.csproj
NuGetaltcode.gendarme—Build/NuGet.csproj
NuGetXmlDoc2CmdletDoc—Build/NuGet.csproj
All dependencies 103

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 20 direct and 83 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAltCode.Dixon—direct
NuGetaltcode.gendarme—direct
NuGetBlackFox.CommandLine—direct
NuGetBlackFox.CommandLine1.0.0direct
NuGetCake.Common—direct
NuGetCake.Core—direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector—direct
NuGetFake.Core.Process—direct
NuGetILRepack—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.TestPlatform.ObjectModel—direct
NuGetMono.Cecil—direct
NuGetMono.Cecil0.10.0direct
NuGetMono.Cecil0.11.1direct
NuGetMono.Options—direct
NuGetNuGet.CommandLine—direct
NuGetNUnit.ConsoleRunner—direct
NuGetopencover—direct
NuGetPester—direct
NuGetXmlDoc2CmdletDoc—direct
NuGetxunit.runner.console—direct
NuGetAltCode.Fake.DotNet.Gendarme—indirect
NuGetaltcover—indirect
NuGetaltcover8.6.125indirect
NuGetaltcover9.0.1indirect
NuGetaltcover.api—indirect
NuGetaltcover.fake—indirect
NuGetAvalonia—indirect
NuGetAvalonia.Desktop—indirect
NuGetAvalonia.Themes.Fluent—indirect
NuGetAvalonia.Themes.Simple—indirect
NuGetBlackFox.VsWhere—indirect
NuGetCommunityToolkit.Diagnostics—indirect
NuGetCsvTextFieldParser—indirect
NuGetExpecto—indirect
NuGetExpecto.TestResults—indirect
NuGetFake.Core.Environment—indirect
NuGetFake.Core.Target—indirect
NuGetFake.Core.Trace—indirect
NuGetFake.DotNet.AssemblyInfoFile—indirect
NuGetFake.DotNet.Cli—indirect
NuGetFake.DotNet.FxCop—indirect
NuGetFake.DotNet.MSBuild—indirect
NuGetFake.DotNet.NuGet—indirect
NuGetFake.DotNet.Testing.Coverlet—indirect
NuGetFake.DotNet.Testing.NUnit—indirect
NuGetFake.DotNet.Testing.OpenCover—indirect
NuGetFake.DotNet.Testing.XUnit2—indirect
NuGetFake.IO.FileSystem—indirect
NuGetFake.Testing.ReportGenerator—indirect
NuGetFake.Tools.Git—indirect
NuGetFSharp.Core—indirect
NuGetFSharp.Core10.0.100indirect
NuGetFSharp.Core3.0.2indirect
NuGetFSharp.Core4.5.2indirect
NuGetFSharp.Core8.0.200indirect
NuGetFsUnit—indirect
NuGetFuchu—indirect
NuGetGtkSharp—indirect
NuGetHandlebars.Net—indirect
NuGetMarkdig—indirect
NuGetMessageBox.Avalonia—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Cryptography.KeyDerivation—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Utilities.Core—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Net.Sdk.Compilers.Toolset—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk15.5.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.9.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies1.0.3indirect
NuGetMono.CSharp—indirect
NuGetMono.Options.Signed0.2.3indirect
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter—indirect
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter3.2.1indirect
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework—indirect
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework3.2.1indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json—indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json11.0.2indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json12.0.3indirect
NuGetNUnit—indirect
NuGetNUnit3.10.1indirect
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter—indirect
NuGetPowerShellStandard.Library—indirect
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable—indirect
NuGetSystem.IO.Compression—indirect
NuGetSystem.Reactive.Core—indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Permissions—indirect
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.5.0indirect
NuGetUnquote—indirect
NuGetxunit—indirect
NuGetxunit2.3.1indirect
NuGetxunit2.9.3indirect
NuGetxunit.abstractions—indirect
NuGetxunit.analyzers—indirect
NuGetxunit.assert—indirect
NuGetxunit.core—indirect
NuGetxunit.extensibility.core—indirect
NuGetxunit.extensibility.execution—indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.3.1indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5indirect
NuGetYoloDev.Expecto.TestSdk—indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 24 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 79 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
Newtonsoft.Json11.0.2indirecthigh113.0.1
Newtonsoft.Json12.0.3indirecthigh113.0.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with SteveGilham/altcover. Read them side by side →

98unoplatform/unoOpen-source platform for building cross-platform native Mobile, Web, Desktop, and Embedded apps from a single C#/XAML codebase. Work from any IDE/CLI with Hot Reload, Visual Designer, MCPs, and Skills built for modern .NET workflows. 200M+ NuGet downloads.Exceptional94NLog/NLogNLog - Flexible and Structured Logging for various .NET PlatformsExceptional100AvaloniaUI/AvaloniaDevelop Desktop, Embedded, Mobile and WebAssembly apps with C# and XAML. The future of .NET UIExceptional99App-vNext/PollyPolly is a .NET resilience and transient-fault-handling library that allows developers to express policies such as Retry, Circuit Breaker, Timeout, Bulkhead Isolation, and Fallback in a fluent and thread-safe manner. From version 6.0.1, Polly targets .NET Standard 1.1 and 2.0+.Exceptional98open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet-contribThis repository contains set of components extending functionality of the OpenTelemetry .NET SDK. Instrumentation libraries, exporters, and other components can find their home here.Exceptional96reactiveui/refitThe automatic type-safe REST library for .NET Core, Xamarin and .NET. Heavily inspired by Square's Retrofit library, Refit turns your REST API into a live interface.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.