Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 17:04 UTC

Project-HAMi / ascend-device-plugin

Kubernetes device plugin for Ascend NPUs, supporting hard and soft NPU slicing with HAMi and Volcano.

GoNo license detected★ 39 stars⑂ 41 forkssince Sep 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined

Project-HAMi/ascend-device-plugin holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (34/100). It was last updated 20 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

HAMi ProjectOrganization
226 followers23 public repossince Jan 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/Project-HAMi/ascend-device-pluginv1.4.1-720 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

77Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 20 days ago
21.5/36Commit cadence — 31/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 253 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year253
human_commit_share0.71
days_since_last_push20
active_weeks_last_year31
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 1 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 20 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagascend-device-plugin-0.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release20
mean_days_between_releases—

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

34At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
25.6/60Stars — 39 stars
13.4/25Forks — 41 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks41
stars39
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 38% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 15 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled15
top_contributor_share0.379
How it's scored
20/42Issue resolution — 48% of issues closed
28.6/30PR acceptance — 80/84 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs80
open_issues23
closed_issues21
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.477
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
16.9/25Owner reach — 226 followers of Project-HAMi
15.3/25Track record — 23 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers226
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginProject-HAMi
public_repos23
account_age_days959

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 20 days ago
20/20Version history — 7 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/Project-HAMi/ascend-device-plugin
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish20

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdevice-plugin, gpu, kubernetes
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3/7.5Vulnerabilities — 6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4.3
How it's scored
9.5/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: google.golang.org/grpc v1.82.0 (critical 9.1)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories7
affected_packages2
assessed_packages73
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 73 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 55 of 71 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.775
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/23 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes40,483
source_files_sampled23
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

39GitHub stars
15contributors
253commits, last 12 months
20days since last push
1releases
2bus factor
23open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 41 ⇿
0Stars
41Forks
1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0102030404032024-102025-092026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 17:04 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Goascend-commonv0.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/Project-HAMi/HAMiv0.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.10.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.23.2go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.82.0go.mod
Gohuawei.com/npu-exporterv0.0.0-00010101000000-000000000000go.mod
Gok8s.io/apiv0.36.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.36.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/client-gov0.36.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/klog/v2v2.140.0go.mod
Gok8s.io/kubeletv0.36.2go.mod
All dependencies 73

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 65 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.10.1direct
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.23.2direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.82.0direct
Gok8s.io/apiv0.36.2direct
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.36.2direct
Gok8s.io/client-gov0.36.2direct
Gok8s.io/klog/v2v2.140.0direct
Gok8s.io/kubeletv0.36.2direct
Gogithub.com/beorn7/perksv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/ccoveille/go-safecast/v2v2.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/v2v2.0.7indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccindirect
Gogithub.com/emicklei/go-restful/v3v3.13.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fxamacker/cbor/v2v2.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonpointerv0.21.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonreferencev0.20.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swagv0.23.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gnostic-modelsv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/imdario/mergov0.3.16indirect
Gogithub.com/influxdata/telegrafv1.26.3indirect
Gogithub.com/josharian/internv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/gov1.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjsonv0.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/sys/capabilityv0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrentv0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1ddindirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect2v1.0.3-0.20250322232337-35a7c28c31eeindirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautonegv0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/nvidia/go-gpuallocatorv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/nvidia/go-nvlibv0.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/nvidia/go-nvmlv0.13.3-1indirect
Gogithub.com/nvidia/k8s-device-pluginv0.19.3indirect
Gogithub.com/nvidia/nvidia-container-toolkitv1.19.1indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/cgroupsv0.0.6indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/runcv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/runtime-specv1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/runtime-toolsv0.9.1-0.20251114084447-edf4cb3d2116indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_modelv0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/commonv0.67.5indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfsv0.20.1indirect
Gogithub.com/russross/blackfriday/v2v2.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.4indirect
Gogithub.com/smartystreets/goconveyv1.7.2indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli/v2v2.27.7indirect
Gogithub.com/x448/float16v0.8.4indirect
Gogithub.com/xrash/smetricsv0.0.0-20240521201337-686a1a2994c1indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v2v2.4.3indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.4indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.38.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.57.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.45.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.14.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260414002931-afd174a4e478indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.12-0.20260120151049-f2248ac996afindirect
Gogopkg.in/evanphx/json-patch.v4v4.13.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/inf.v0v0.9.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Gok8s.io/kube-openapiv0.0.0-20260317180543-43fb72c5454aindirect
Gok8s.io/utilsv0.0.0-20260210185600-b8788abfbbc2indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/jsonv0.0.0-20250730193827-2d320260d730indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/randfillv1.0.0indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v6v6.3.2indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/yamlv1.6.0indirect
Gotags.cncf.io/container-device-interfacev1.1.0indirect
Gotags.cncf.io/container-device-interface/specs-gov1.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 73 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
google.golang.org/grpcv1.82.0directcritical51.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
golang.org/x/modv0.38.0indirectunknown21.27.0-rc.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.