Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 15:46 UTC

Protocol-Wealth / pwos-core

Open source compliance-first AI operating system for SEC-registered investment advisers. Apache 2.0 licensed with defensive patent grant.

TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 5 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#advisory#ai#compliance#crm-system#digital#fintech#open-source#pii-detection#pii-redaction#productivity-tools#ria#wealth-management#agent-tools#governance#mcp#regulated-finance

Protocol-Wealth/pwos-core holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (49/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Protocol Wealth, LLCOrganization · verified domain
6 followers10 public repossince Dec 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@protocolwealthos/crm0.3.219456 days ago—
npm@protocolwealthos/auth0.2.120256 days ago—
npm@protocolwealthos/ledger0.2.125256 days ago—
npm@protocolwealthos/shared0.2.2205456 days agoai-governancecompliancehitlhuman-in-the-loopprovenancehash-chaintamper-evidentsec-204-2ria
npm@protocolwealthos/holdings0.2.124256 days ago—
npm@protocolwealthos/audit-log0.5.323556 days ago—
npm@protocolwealthos/mcp-tools0.3.21,255456 days ago—
npm@protocolwealthos/pii-guard0.4.248556 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

79Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
15.2/36Commit cadence — 22/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 149 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year149
human_commit_share0.54
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year22

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 25 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 117 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count25
latest_release_tag@protocolwealthos/audit-log@0.5.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release117
mean_days_between_releases1.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

14Critical
How it's scored
9.8/60Stars — 5 stars
4/25Forks — 4 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars5
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

54Moderate
How it's scored
42.8/80Monthly downloads — 1,619 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@protocolwealthos/crm, @protocolwealthos/auth, @protocolwealthos/ledger, @protocolwealthos/shared, @protocolwealthos/holdings, @protocolwealthos/audit-log, @protocolwealthos/mcp-tools, @protocolwealthos/pii-guard
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads1,619
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

24At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 66% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.66

Issue & PR responsiveness

43Weak
How it's scored
8.4/42Issue resolution — 20% of issues closed
29.4/30PR acceptance — 102/104 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs102
open_issues4
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.2
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

65Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
6.1/25Owner reach — 6 followers of Protocol-Wealth
9.1/25Track record — 10 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers6
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginProtocol-Wealth
public_repos10
account_age_days283

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 8 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 56 days ago
20/20Version history — 5 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@protocolwealthos/crm, @protocolwealthos/auth, @protocolwealthos/ledger, @protocolwealthos/shared, @protocolwealthos/holdings, @protocolwealthos/audit-log, @protocolwealthos/mcp-tools, @protocolwealthos/pii-guard
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish56

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://protocolwealthllc.com/opensource
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 16 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsadvisory, ai, compliance, crm-system, digital, fintech, open-source, pii-detection, pii-redaction, productivity-tools, ria, wealth-management, agent-tools, governance, mcp, regulated-finance
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://protocolwealthllc.com/opensource
docs_sitehttps://protocolwealthllc.com/opensource
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

72Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

65Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages196
unassessed_packages5
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 196 resolved dependencies against OSV. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

84Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://protocolwealthllc.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 51 of 54 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://protocolwealthllc.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.944
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes8,933

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

61Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — apps/evals/tsconfig.json, examples/rias-agent-substrate/tsconfig.json, packages/ai-guardrails/tsconfig.json, packages/audit-log/tsconfig.json, packages/auth/tsconfig.json, packages/cache-keys/tsconfig.json, packages/compliance/tsconfig.json, packages/crm/tsconfig.json, packages/disclosure-card/tsconfig.json, packages/document-gen/tsconfig.json, packages/email-archive/tsconfig.json, packages/gcp-helpers/tsconfig.json, packages/holdings/tsconfig.json, packages/ledger/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp-tools/tsconfig.json, packages/onchain-accounting-contract/tsconfig.json, packages/onchain-sdk/tsconfig.json, packages/pii-guard/tsconfig.json, packages/planning-contract/tsconfig.json, packages/security-headers/tsconfig.json, packages/shared/tsconfig.json, packages/webhooks/tsconfig.json, packages/workflow-engine/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 29 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 37 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsapps/evals/tsconfig.json, examples/rias-agent-substrate/tsconfig.json, packages/ai-guardrails/tsconfig.json, packages/audit-log/tsconfig.json, packages/auth/tsconfig.json, packages/cache-keys/tsconfig.json, packages/compliance/tsconfig.json, packages/crm/tsconfig.json, packages/disclosure-card/tsconfig.json, packages/document-gen/tsconfig.json, packages/email-archive/tsconfig.json, packages/gcp-helpers/tsconfig.json, packages/holdings/tsconfig.json, packages/ledger/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp-tools/tsconfig.json, packages/onchain-accounting-contract/tsconfig.json, packages/onchain-sdk/tsconfig.json, packages/pii-guard/tsconfig.json, packages/planning-contract/tsconfig.json, packages/security-headers/tsconfig.json, packages/shared/tsconfig.json, packages/webhooks/tsconfig.json, packages/workflow-engine/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.29
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.37

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/205 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes43,432
source_files_sampled205
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

5GitHub stars
3contributors
149commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
25releases
1bus factor
4open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿
0Stars
4Forks
15Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1223344412026-042026-062026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10
6.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 15:46 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@protocolwealthos/disclosure-cardworkspace:^packages/compliance/package.json
npmzod^4.5.4packages/disclosure-card/package.json
npm@protocolwealthos/mcp-toolsworkspace:^0.3.2packages/onchain-accounting-contract/package.json
npmzod^4.5.4packages/onchain-accounting-contract/package.json
npm@protocolwealthos/mcp-toolsworkspace:^packages/planning-contract/package.json
npmzod^4.5.4packages/shared/package.json
All dependencies 201

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 199 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmzod4.5.4direct
npmzod^4.5.4direct
npm@anthropic-ai/sdk0.97.1indirect
npm@babel/runtime7.29.2indirect
npm@changesets/apply-release-plan8.1.0indirect
npm@changesets/assemble-release-plan7.0.0indirect
npm@changesets/changelog-git1.0.0indirect
npm@changesets/changelog-github1.0.0indirect
npm@changesets/cli3.0.1indirect
npm@changesets/config4.0.0indirect
npm@changesets/errors1.0.0indirect
npm@changesets/format0.1.2indirect
npm@changesets/get-dependents-graph3.0.0indirect
npm@changesets/get-github-info1.0.1indirect
npm@changesets/git4.0.1indirect
npm@changesets/parse1.0.0indirect
npm@changesets/pre3.0.0indirect
npm@changesets/read1.0.1indirect
npm@changesets/should-skip-package1.0.0indirect
npm@changesets/types7.0.0indirect
npm@changesets/write1.0.1indirect
npm@clack/core1.4.3indirect
npm@clack/prompts1.7.0indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.6.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@manypkg/find-root3.1.0indirect
npm@manypkg/get-packages3.1.0indirect
npm@manypkg/tools2.1.2indirect
npm@pnpm/deps.graph-sequencer1100.0.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.62.2indirect
npm@stablelib/base641.0.1indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/node26.4.1indirect
npm@types/node^26.4.1indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-loong647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-sunos-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-x647.0.2indirect
npm@vitest/mocker5.0.0indirect
npm@vitest/spy5.0.0indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmcac7.0.0indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmdataloader2.2.3indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.3.2indirect
npmesbuild0.28.1indirect
npmesbuild0.28.2indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.4.0indirect
npmfast-sha2561.3.0indirect
npmfast-string-truncated-width3.0.3indirect
npmfast-string-width3.0.2indirect
npmfast-wrap-ansi0.2.2indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmhuman-id4.2.1indirect
npmimport-meta-resolve4.2.0indirect
npmjju1.4.0indirect
npmjson-schema-to-ts3.1.1indirect
npmjsonc-parser3.3.1indirect
npmlaunch-editor2.14.1indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmmagic-string1.2.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.16indirect
npmobug2.1.4indirect
npmpackage-manager-detector1.8.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.7indirect
npmpostcss8.5.23indirect
npmrollup4.62.2indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmshell-quote1.10.0indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsisteransi1.0.5indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstandardwebhooks1.0.0indirect
npmstd-env4.2.0indirect
npmtinybench6.1.4indirect
npmtinyexec1.3.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.3.1indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmts-algebra2.0.0indirect
npmtsx4.23.13indirect
npmtsx^4.23.13indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmtypescript^7.0.2indirect
npmundici-types8.3.0indirect
npmvite6.4.3indirect
npmvitest5.0.0indirect
npmvitest^5.0.0indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmyaml2.9.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 196 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
nanoid3.3.16indirecthigh15.1.6

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Protocol-Wealth/pwos-core. Read them side by side →

96stacklok/toolhive-registry-serverDiscover, govern and control access to MCP servers and agent skills across your organizationExceptional99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional96microsoft/agent-governance-toolkitAI Agent Governance Toolkit — Policy enforcement, zero-trust identity, execution sandboxing, and reliability engineering for autonomous AI agents. Covers 10/10 OWASP Agentic Top 10.Exceptional99ag2ai/ag2AG2 (formerly AutoGen): The Open-Source AgentOS.Join us at: https://discord.gg/sNGSwQME3xExceptional100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional98ModelEngine-Group/nexentNexent is a zero-code platform for auto-generating production-grade AI agents using Harness Engineering principles — unified tools, skills, memory, and orchestration with built-in constraints, feedback loops, and control planes.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.