Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 08:48 UTC

Quantus-Network / qp-plonky2

RustApache-2.0★ 1 star⑂ 3 forkssince Feb 2025forkView on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

Quantus-Network/qp-plonky2 holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (89/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (26/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

QuantusOrganization
746 followers61 public repossince Jan 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioqp-plonky2-core1.5.42,391101 day agocryptographyfriplonky2quantus-networksnark
crates.ioqp-plonky2-field1.5.42,439191 day agocryptographyfriplonky2quantus-networksnark
crates.ioplonky2_maybe_rayonpoints to another repo — not scored1.0.011,2114598 days agocryptographyfriplonkplonky2snark
crates.ioqp-plonky21.5.42,338171 day agocryptographyfriplonky2quantus-networksnark
crates.iostarkypoints to another repo — not scored1.1.032311430 days agocryptographyfriplonkplonky2snark
crates.ioplonky2_util1.0.07,3904598 days ago—
crates.ioqp-plonky2-verifier1.5.42,37991 day agocryptographyfriplonky2quantus-networksnark

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

81Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
16.6/36Commit cadence — 24/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 103 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 21 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year103
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year24

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 16 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~17.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count16
latest_release_tagv1.5.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases17.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

26At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

2Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
2.5/25Forks — 3 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

66Good
How it's scored
53.1/80Monthly downloads — 9,547 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesqp-plonky2-core, qp-plonky2-field, qp-plonky2, qp-plonky2-verifier
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads51,934
monthly_downloads9,547
unverified_packages_excludedplonky2_util
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

78Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

65Good
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 28% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 62 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled62
top_contributor_share0.276

Issue & PR responsiveness

71Good
How it's scored
28.7/42Issue resolution — 68% of issues closed
21.3/30PR acceptance — 49/69 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 24/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs49
open_issues6
closed_issues13
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.684
closed_unmerged_prs20
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

83Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
20.7/25Owner reach — 746 followers of Quantus-Network
16/25Track record — 61 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers746
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginQuantus-Network
public_repos61
account_age_days550
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 5 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history — 19 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesqp-plonky2-core, qp-plonky2-field, qp-plonky2, plonky2_util, qp-plonky2-verifier
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

51Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/qp-plonky2-core
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/qp-plonky2-core
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

60Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-Review — Found 24/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 21 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

56Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes — 1/257 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes75,211
source_files_sampled257
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1GitHub stars
62contributors
103commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
16releases
2bus factor
6open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • Could not fetch crates package 'qp-plonky2-constraint-exporter' from its registry
  • crates package 'plonky2_maybe_rayon' points at a different repository (https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/plonky2); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'starky' points at a different repository (https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/plonky2); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 08:47 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 24/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 13 contributing companies or organizations
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained21 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 73
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioplonky2—constraint-exporter/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqp-plonky2-core=1.5.4constraint-exporter/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum—constraint-exporter/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand—constraint-exporter/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—constraint-exporter/Cargo.toml
crates.ioahash—core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—core/Cargo.toml
crates.iohashbrown—core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools—core/Cargo.toml
crates.iokeccak-hash=0.8.0core/Cargo.toml
crates.iolog—core/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum=0.4.3core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—core/Cargo.toml
crates.iostatic_assertions—core/Cargo.toml
crates.iounroll—core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioplonky2-field=1.5.4core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioplonky2_util=1.0.0core/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand=0.10.1core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—field/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools—field/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum—field/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand—field/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—field/Cargo.toml
crates.iostatic_assertions—field/Cargo.toml
crates.iounroll—field/Cargo.toml
crates.ioplonky2_util=1.0.0field/Cargo.toml
crates.iorayon=1.11.0maybe_rayon/Cargo.toml
crates.ioahash—plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioonce_cell=1.21.3plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.iocritical-section=1.2.0plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.iohashbrown—plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools—plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.iokeccak-hash=0.8.0plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqp-poseidon-core=3.0.2plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand—plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.iolog—plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum—plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.iostatic_assertions—plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.iounroll—plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioweb-time=1.1.0plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioplonky2-field=1.5.4plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioplonky2-verifier=1.5.4plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioplonky2_maybe_rayon=1.0.0plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioplonky2_util=1.0.0plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqp-plonky2-core=1.5.4plonky2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioahash—starky/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—starky/Cargo.toml
crates.iohashbrown—starky/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools—starky/Cargo.toml
crates.iolog—starky/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—starky/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-bigint=0.4.6starky/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqp-plonky2=1.5.4starky/Cargo.toml
crates.ioplonky2_maybe_rayon=1.0.0starky/Cargo.toml
crates.ioplonky2_util=1.0.0starky/Cargo.toml
crates.ioahash—verifier/Cargo.toml
crates.ioonce_cell=1.21.3verifier/Cargo.toml
crates.iocritical-section=1.2.0verifier/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—verifier/Cargo.toml
crates.iohashbrown—verifier/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools—verifier/Cargo.toml
crates.iokeccak-hash=0.8.0verifier/Cargo.toml
crates.iolog—verifier/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum=0.4.3verifier/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—verifier/Cargo.toml
crates.iostatic_assertions—verifier/Cargo.toml
crates.iounroll—verifier/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqp-poseidon-core=3.0.2verifier/Cargo.toml
crates.ioplonky2-field=1.5.4verifier/Cargo.toml
crates.ioplonky2_util=1.0.0verifier/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqp-plonky2-core=1.5.4verifier/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Quantus-Network/qp-plonky2. Read them side by side →

91Plonky3/Plonky3A toolkit for polynomial IOPs (PIOPs)Excellent94Consensys/gnark-cryptognark-crypto provides elliptic curve and pairing-based cryptography on BN, BLS12, BLS24 and BW6 curves. It also provides various algorithms (algebra, crypto) of particular interest to zero knowledge proof systemsExceptional83Quantus-Network/qp-rusty-crystalsA pure-rust no-std reasonably-constant-time stack-efficient implementation of ML-DSA-87 Excellent98zama-ai/tfhe-rsTFHE-rs: A Pure Rust implementation of the TFHE Scheme for Boolean and Integer Arithmetics Over Encrypted Data.Exceptional98noir-lang/noirNoir is a domain specific language for zero knowledge proofsExceptional97rustls/rustlsA modern TLS library in RustExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.