Public recordExceptional
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 18:53 UTC
QwenLM / qwen-code
An open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.
KindDesktop applicationCommand-line toolLibraryWeb interfaceTerminal interfacehow this is determined
QwenLM/qwen-code holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (95/100) and lowest on Security (46/100). It was last updated today. 7 contributors account for most of its recent work.
96
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
96
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 83 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
QwenOrganization
19,382 followers54 public repossince Aug 2023
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| npm | @qwen-code/qwen-code | 0.24.0 | 274,984 | 639 | 0 days ago |
| npm | docs-site | 0.0.1 | 43 | 2 | 482 days ago |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
95
Development activity
99Exceptional
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 0 days ago |
| 35.3/36 | Commit cadence — 51/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 7,343 commits in the last year |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 7,343 |
| human_commit_share | 1 |
| days_since_last_push | 0 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 51 |
Release discipline
90Excellent
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 100 releases published |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 0 days ago |
| 27/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~0.4 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 100 |
| latest_release_tag | v0.24.0 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 0 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 0.4 |
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
88
Popularity & adoption
97Exceptional
How it's scored
| 60/60 | Stars — 27,897 stars |
| 25/25 | Forks — 3,046 forks |
| 12/15 | Watchers — 148 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 3,046 |
| stars | 27,897 |
| watchers | 148 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
77Good
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (Apache-2.0) |
| 18/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 6.3/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 4 |
| has_contributing | yes |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | shields.io |
| has_pull_request_template | yes |
Ecosystem adoption (downloads)
91Excellent
How it's scored
| 72.5/80 | Monthly downloads — 274,984 downloads/month across npm |
| 0/20 | Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem |
Inputs used
| packages | @qwen-code/qwen-code |
| dependents | — |
| ecosystems | npm |
| total_downloads | — |
| monthly_downloads | 274,984 |
| unverified_packages_excluded | docs-site |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
87
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
94Exceptional
How it's scored
| 51.3/54 | Bus factor — 7 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 19.5/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 13% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 99 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 20 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 7 |
| contributors_sampled | 99 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.132 |
Issue & PR responsiveness
82Excellent
How it's scored
| 32/42 | Issue resolution — 76% of issues closed |
| 24.5/30 | PR acceptance — 5,325/6,529 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 15/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 5,325 |
| open_issues | 1,160 |
| closed_issues | 3,737 |
| prs_merged_7d | 57 |
| prs_decided_7d | 60 |
| prs_merged_30d | 57 |
| prs_decided_30d | 60 |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.763 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 1,204 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
74Good
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 0/20 | Verified domain |
| 25/25 | Owner reach — 19,382 followers of QwenLM |
| 18.9/25 | Track record — 54 public repos, account ~3 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 19,382 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | no |
| owner_login | QwenLM |
| public_repos | 54 |
| account_age_days | 1,141 |
Package maintenance
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 25/25 | Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on npm |
| 35/35 | Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago |
| 20/20 | Version history — 639 published versions |
| 20/20 | Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked |
Inputs used
| packages | @qwen-code/qwen-code, docs-site |
| ecosystems | npm |
| any_deprecated | no |
| min_days_since_publish | 0 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
90
Engineering practices
90Excellent
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 57 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config — eslint.config.js, eslint.config.mjs |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 6.4/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 20/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | yes |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
90Excellent
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://qwenlm.github.io/qwen-code-docs/en/users/overview |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 10/10 | Topics — 12 topics |
| 0/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | agentic, ai, ai-agent, ai-coding, cli, coding-agent, developer-tools, llm, mcp, qwen, terminal, typescript |
| has_wiki | no |
| homepage | https://qwenlm.github.io/qwen-code-docs/en/users/overview |
| docs_site | https://qwenlm.github.io/qwen-code-docs/en/users/overview |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
46
Security posture
46Weak
How it's scored
| 2.2/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 2.5/2.5 | CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Code-Review — all changesets reviewed |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 20 contributing companies or organizations |
| 0/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 5/5 | Packaging — packaging workflow detected |
| 3/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6 |
| 3.5/5 | SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits |
| 5/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 103 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 18 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 0 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 4.6 |
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
93
Agent context & guidance
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md |
| 15/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://qwenlm.github.io/qwen-code-docs/llms.txt) |
| 40/40 | Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | yes |
| llms_txt_url | https://qwenlm.github.io/qwen-code-docs/llms.txt |
| legible_history_share | 1 |
| agent_instruction_files | AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | 17,023 |
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
83Excellent
How it's scored
| 18/18 | One-command bootstrap — Makefile |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config — eslint.config.js, eslint.config.mjs |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — integration-tests/tsconfig.json, integrations/external-context-mem0/tsconfig.json, integrations/external-context/examples/provider-extension-local/tsconfig.json, integrations/external-context/tsconfig.json, packages/acp-bridge/tsconfig.json, packages/audio-capture/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/base/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/dingtalk/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/dws/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/feishu/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/github/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/gitlab/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/plugin-example/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/qqbot/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/telegram/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/wecom/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/weixin/tsconfig.json, packages/chrome-extension/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/src/commands/extensions/examples/mcp-server/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/src/commands/extensions/examples/starter/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/cua-driver/examples/agent-sdks/tsconfig.json, packages/cua-driver/typescript/computer-use/test/tsconfig.json, packages/cua-driver/typescript/tsconfig.json, packages/live-host/tsconfig.json, packages/mobile-mcp/tsconfig.json, packages/node-repl/tsconfig.json, packages/qwen-live/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk-python/src/qwen_code_sdk/py.typed, packages/sdk-typescript/tsconfig.json, packages/vscode-ide-companion/tsconfig.json, packages/web-shell/tsconfig.json, packages/web-templates/src/export-html/tsconfig.json, packages/web-templates/src/insight/tsconfig.json, packages/web-templates/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| 5/8 | Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| 6/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | Cargo.lock, package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, uv.lock |
| has_dockerfile | yes |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | Makefile |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | integration-tests/tsconfig.json, integrations/external-context-mem0/tsconfig.json, integrations/external-context/examples/provider-extension-local/tsconfig.json, integrations/external-context/tsconfig.json, packages/acp-bridge/tsconfig.json, packages/audio-capture/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/base/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/dingtalk/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/dws/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/feishu/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/github/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/gitlab/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/plugin-example/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/qqbot/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/telegram/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/wecom/tsconfig.json, packages/channels/weixin/tsconfig.json, packages/chrome-extension/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/src/commands/extensions/examples/mcp-server/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/src/commands/extensions/examples/starter/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/cua-driver/examples/agent-sdks/tsconfig.json, packages/cua-driver/typescript/computer-use/test/tsconfig.json, packages/cua-driver/typescript/tsconfig.json, packages/live-host/tsconfig.json, packages/mobile-mcp/tsconfig.json, packages/node-repl/tsconfig.json, packages/qwen-live/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk-python/src/qwen_code_sdk/py.typed, packages/sdk-typescript/tsconfig.json, packages/vscode-ide-companion/tsconfig.json, packages/web-shell/tsconfig.json, packages/web-templates/src/export-html/tsconfig.json, packages/web-templates/src/insight/tsconfig.json, packages/web-templates/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json |
| agent_commit_share | 0 |
| toolchain_manifests | packages/cua-driver/compat-fixtures/apps/rust/Cargo.toml, packages/cua-driver/rust/Cargo.toml, packages/cua-driver/rust/crates/cua-driver-bindgen/Cargo.toml, packages/cua-driver/rust/crates/cua-driver-contract/Cargo.toml, packages/cua-driver/rust/crates/cua-driver-core/Cargo.toml, packages/cua-driver/rust/crates/cua-driver-sdk/Cargo.toml, packages/cua-driver/rust/crates/cua-driver-testkit/Cargo.toml, packages/cua-driver/rust/crates/cua-driver-uia/Cargo.toml, packages/cua-driver/rust/crates/cua-driver/Cargo.toml, packages/cua-driver/rust/crates/cursor-overlay/Cargo.toml, packages/cua-driver/rust/crates/cursor-theme-cli/Cargo.toml, packages/cua-driver/rust/crates/pip-preview/Cargo.toml, packages/cua-driver/rust/crates/platform-linux/Cargo.toml, packages/cua-driver/rust/crates/platform-macos/Cargo.toml, packages/cua-driver/rust/crates/platform-windows/Cargo.toml, packages/cua-driver/tests/fixtures/apps/cross-platform/tauri/src-tauri/Cargo.toml, packages/cua-driver/tests/fixtures/apps/windows/webview2/CuaTestHarness.WebView.csproj, packages/cua-driver/tests/fixtures/apps/windows/winui3/CuaTestHarness.WinUI3.csproj, packages/cua-driver/tests/fixtures/apps/windows/wpf/CuaTestHarness.Wpf.csproj, packages/desktop-shell/src-tauri/Cargo.toml, packages/sdk-java/client/pom.xml, packages/sdk-java/qwencode/pom.xml |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
Code legibility for models
97Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed) |
| 51.7/55 | Manageable file sizes — 409/6,778 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | TypeScript |
| largest_source_bytes | 4,025,780 |
| source_files_sampled | 6,778 |
| oversized_source_files | 409 |
Machine-readable interfaces
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 0/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 20/20 | MCP server |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — example, examples |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | example, examples |
| has_mcp_signal | yes |
| api_schema_files | — |
| interfaces_expected_of | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
27,897GitHub stars
99contributors
7,343commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
7bus factor
1,160open issues
npmpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
- deps.dev does not index npm:@qwen-code/qwen-code@0.24.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead
More detail
Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3,046 ⇿
0Stars
3,046Forks
98Releases
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.
Major 0Minor 2Patch 10
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 3 | Binary-Artifacts | binaries present in source code |
| 0 | Branch-Protection | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 10 | CI-Tests | 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 10 | Code-Review | all changesets reviewed |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 20 contributing companies or organizations |
| 0 | Dangerous-Workflow | dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 10 | Maintained | 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 10 | Packaging | packaging workflow detected |
| 6 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6 |
| 7 | SAST | SAST tool detected but not run on all commits |
| 10 | Security-Policy | security policy file detected |
| 0 | Signed-Releases | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0 | Vulnerabilities | 103 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 8
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | next | ^16.0.8 | docs-site/package.json |
| npm | nextra | ^4.6.1 | docs-site/package.json |
| npm | nextra-theme-docs | ^4.6.1 | docs-site/package.json |
| npm | react | ^19.2.1 | docs-site/package.json |
| npm | react-dom | ^19.2.1 | docs-site/package.json |
| npm | @testing-library/dom | ^10.4.1 | package.json |
| npm | ink | 7.0.3 | package.json |
| npm | simple-git | ^3.36.0 | package.json |
All dependencies not collected
The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.