Software health reportschema 0.32.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-20 08:17 UTC

Rebilly / rebilly-php

SDK for PHP

PHPMIT★ 18 stars⑂ 18 forkssince Jan 2014View on GitHub ↗

#payment-gateway #transactions #subscriptions

Rebilly/rebilly-php holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (79/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (46/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

RebillyOrganization

17 followers38 public repossince Jan 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	rebilly/client-php	3.1.9	13,117	58	70 days ago	api payment-processing subscriptions transactions

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

70Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
10.4/36	Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
14.1/18	Commit volume — 36 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	36
human_commit_share	0.95
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	15

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 56 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 75 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~108.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	56
latest_release_tag	3.1.8
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	75
mean_days_between_releases	108.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

46Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

37Weak

How it's scored

20/60	Stars — 18 stars
10.3/25	Forks — 18 forks
6.8/15	Watchers — 18 watchers

Inputs used

forks	18
stars	18
watchers	18
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

55Moderate

How it's scored

54.9/80	Monthly downloads — 13,117 downloads/month across packagist
0/20	Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	rebilly/client-php
dependents	0
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	443,578
monthly_downloads	13,117
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

36Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.3/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 72% of commits
10.8/13.5	Contributor breadth — 8 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	8
top_contributor_share	0.722

Issue & PR responsiveness

98Exceptional

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
27.9/30	PR acceptance — 714/769 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	714
open_issues	0
closed_issues	19
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	55
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

78Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
9/25	Owner reach — 17 followers of Rebilly
23.6/25	Track record — 38 public repos, account ~12 yr old

Inputs used

followers	17
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	Rebilly
public_repos	38
account_age_days	4,605

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 70 days ago
20/20	Version history — 58 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	rebilly/client-php
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	70

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

63Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

62Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.php
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
16/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 26 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://www.rebilly.com
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	payment-gateway, transactions, subscriptions
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://www.rebilly.com
docs_site	https://www.rebilly.com
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

60Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2/2.5	CI-Tests — 26 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
1/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 6 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	9
affected_packages	3
assessed_packages	190
unassessed_packages	8
affected_by_severity	high 3
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 190 resolved dependencies against OSV. 8 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

48Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 95 of 95 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

33At Risk

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
0/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.php
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
2/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.01
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.05

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
54.9/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/1,548 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	77,882
source_files_sampled	1,548
oversized_source_files	2

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

18GitHub stars

8contributors

36commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

56releases

1bus factor

0open issues

npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 18 ⇿

0Stars

18Forks

47Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 26Patch 16

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10

6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-20 08:16 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8	CI-Tests	26 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
10	Contributors	project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
2	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4	Vulnerabilities	6 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 3

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	psr/http-message	`^1.0 \|\| ^2.0`	composer.json
Packagist	guzzlehttp/psr7	`^1.0 \|\| ^2.0`	composer.json
Packagist	guzzlehttp/guzzle	`~7.0`	composer.json

All dependencies 198

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 195 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	guzzlehttp/guzzle	`—`	direct
Packagist	guzzlehttp/psr7	`—`	direct
Packagist	psr/http-message	`—`	direct
npm	@babel/runtime	`7.28.6`	indirect
npm	@changesets/apply-release-plan	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	@changesets/assemble-release-plan	`6.0.9`	indirect
npm	@changesets/changelog-git	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	@changesets/cli	`2.30.0`	indirect
npm	@changesets/config	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	@changesets/errors	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	@changesets/get-dependents-graph	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	@changesets/get-release-plan	`4.0.15`	indirect
npm	@changesets/get-version-range-type	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	@changesets/git	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	@changesets/logger	`0.1.1`	indirect
npm	@changesets/parse	`0.4.3`	indirect
npm	@changesets/pre	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	@changesets/read	`0.6.7`	indirect
npm	@changesets/should-skip-package	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	@changesets/types	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	@changesets/types	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	@changesets/write	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	@cspotcode/source-map-support	`0.8.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/external-editor	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.9`	indirect
npm	@manypkg/find-root	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@manypkg/get-packages	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.scandir	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.stat	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.walk	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	@rebilly/regenerator	`0.0.10`	indirect
npm	@redocly/ajv	`8.18.1`	indirect
npm	@redocly/ajv	`8.18.3`	indirect
npm	@redocly/config	`0.49.0`	indirect
npm	@redocly/openapi-core	`2.31.6`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/node10	`1.0.12`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/node12	`1.0.11`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/node14	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/node16	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`12.20.55`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`25.3.5`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.16.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-walk	`8.3.5`	indirect
npm	ajv-formats	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-colors	`4.1.3`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	arg	`4.1.3`	indirect
npm	argparse	`1.0.10`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	array-union	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	better-path-resolve	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	braces	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	chardet	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	cliui	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	colorette	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	create-require	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	detect-indent	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	diff	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	dir-glob	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	enquirer	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	es-toolkit	`1.46.1`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	esprima	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	extendable-error	`0.1.7`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-glob	`3.3.3`	indirect
npm	fast-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	fastq	`1.20.1`	indirect
npm	fill-range	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	find-up	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	fs-extra	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	fs-extra	`8.1.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	globby	`11.1.0`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	handlebars	`4.7.9`	indirect
npm	human-id	`4.1.3`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.7.2`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-number	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-subdir	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	is-windows	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-levenshtein	`1.1.6`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`3.14.2`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-to-ts	`2.7.2`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	jsonfile	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.startcase	`4.4.0`	indirect
npm	make-error	`1.3.6`	indirect
npm	merge2	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	micromatch	`4.0.8`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.54.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	mri	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	neo-async	`2.6.2`	indirect
npm	outdent	`0.5.0`	indirect
npm	p-filter	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-map	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-try	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	package-manager-detector	`0.2.11`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-type	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`2.3.2`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	pify	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	pluralize	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	prettier	`2.8.8`	indirect
npm	quansync	`0.2.11`	indirect
npm	queue-microtask	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	read-yaml-file	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	require-directory	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	require-from-string	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	reusify	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	run-parallel	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.7.4`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	slash	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	spawndamnit	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	sprintf-js	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-bom	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	term-size	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	to-regex-range	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ts-algebra	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	ts-node	`10.9.2`	indirect
npm	tsx	`4.22.4`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.9.3`	indirect
npm	uglify-js	`3.19.3`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`7.18.2`	indirect
npm	universalify	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	v8-compile-cache-lib	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	wordwrap	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yaml-ast-parser	`0.0.43`	indirect
npm	yargs	`17.7.2`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`21.1.1`	indirect
npm	yn	`3.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	ext-curl	`—`	indirect
Packagist	ext-json	`—`	indirect
Packagist	friendsofphp/php-cs-fixer	`—`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	vimeo/psalm	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 190 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 8 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
fast-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect	high	3	`4.1.2`
js-yaml	`3.14.2`	indirect	high	3	`4.3.1`
js-yaml	`4.1.1`	indirect	high	3	`4.3.1`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.32.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records