Public recordGood
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 12:48 UTC
SQLAnvil / sqlanvil
Analytics engineering for Postgres & Supabase — Dataform-style SQL workflows (SQLX, refs, assertions, incremental tables, materialized views), with first-class BigQuery and MySQL/MariaDB support.
SQLAnvil/sqlanvil holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (33/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.
77
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
SQLAnvilOrganization · verified domain
0 followers7 public repossince May 2026
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
96
Development activity
94Exceptional
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 2 days ago |
| 29.8/36 | Commit cadence — 43/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 506 commits in the last year |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 28 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 506 |
| human_commit_share | 0.96 |
| days_since_last_push | 2 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 43 |
Release discipline
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 54 releases published |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 2 days ago |
| 27/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~4.5 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 54 |
| latest_release_tag | v1.32.5 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 2 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 4.5 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
33
Popularity & adoption
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/60 | Stars — 1 stars |
| 0/25 | Forks — 0 forks |
| 0/15 | Watchers — 0 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 0 |
| stars | 1 |
| watchers | 0 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | below_threshold |
Community health
70Good
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (Apache-2.0) |
| 18/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 0 |
| has_contributing | yes |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | — |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
57
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
64Moderate
How it's scored
| 25.2/54 | Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 15.5/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 31% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 68 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 2 |
| contributors_sampled | 68 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.311 |
Issue & PR responsiveness
50Moderate
How it's scored
| 30.7/42 | Issue resolution — 73% of issues closed |
| 13/30 | PR acceptance — 10/23 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 10 |
| open_issues | 10 |
| closed_issues | 27 |
| prs_merged_7d | 0 |
| prs_decided_7d | 0 |
| prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| prs_decided_30d | 0 |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.73 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 13 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
57Moderate
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 20/20 | Verified domain |
| 0/25 | Owner reach — 0 followers of SQLAnvil |
| 7.2/25 | Track record — 7 public repos, account ~0 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 0 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | yes |
| owner_login | SQLAnvil |
| public_repos | 7 |
| account_age_days | 105 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
88
Engineering practices
80Excellent
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 1 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config — .eslintrc.js |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
Documentation
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://sqlanvil.com/docs |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 10/10 | Topics — 12 topics |
| 10/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | analytics-engineering, bigquery, cli, data-transformation, dataform, dbt-alternative, elt, postgres, sql, supabase, mariadb, mysql |
| has_wiki | yes |
| homepage | https://sqlanvil.com/docs |
| docs_site | https://sqlanvil.com/docs |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
44
Security posture
44Weak
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 2.2/7.5 | Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| 0/2.5 | CI-Tests — no data |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 28 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | SAST — no SAST tool detected |
| 0/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file not detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — no data |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 56 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 15 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 3 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 4.4 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
89
Agent context & guidance
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md |
| 15/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://sqlanvil.com/llms.txt) |
| 40/40 | Legible commit history — 91 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | yes |
| llms_txt_url | https://sqlanvil.com/llms.txt |
| legible_history_share | 0.948 |
| agent_instruction_files | AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | 25,759 |
How it's scored
| 0/18 | One-command bootstrap |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config — .eslintrc.js |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — tsconfig.json |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile |
| 10/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — 64 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited |
| 8/8 | Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | package-lock.json, yarn.lock |
| has_dockerfile | yes |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | — |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | tsconfig.json |
| agent_commit_share | 0.64 |
| toolchain_manifests | — |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0.04 |
Code legibility for models
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed) |
| 54.6/55 | Manageable file sizes — 2/250 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | TypeScript |
| largest_source_bytes | 103,277 |
| source_files_sampled | 250 |
| oversized_source_files | 2 |
Machine-readable interfaces
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 40/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — protos/configs.proto, protos/core.proto, protos/db_adapter.proto, protos/evaluation.proto, protos/execution.proto, protos/extension.proto, protos/jit.proto, protos/profiles.proto |
| 0/20 | MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — examples, notebooks |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | examples, notebooks |
| has_mcp_signal | no |
| api_schema_files | protos/configs.proto, protos/core.proto, protos/db_adapter.proto, protos/evaluation.proto, protos/execution.proto, protos/extension.proto, protos/jit.proto, protos/profiles.proto |
| interfaces_expected_of | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
1GitHub stars
68contributors
506commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
54releases
2bus factor
10open issues
npmpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- Star history carried forward from 2026-06-19: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 1 stars today.
- Could not fetch npm package 'sqlanvil' from its registry
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
More detail
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| 3 | Branch-Protection | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| n/a | CI-Tests | no pull request found |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0 | Code-Review | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 13 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 10 | Maintained | 30 commit(s) and 28 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| 0 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | SAST | no SAST tool detected |
| 0 | Security-Policy | security policy file not detected |
| n/a | Signed-Releases | no releases found |
| 0 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0 | Vulnerabilities | 56 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 96
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | @bazel/hide-bazel-files | 1.0.0 | package.json |
| npm | @bazel/ibazel | ^0.9.1 | package.json |
| npm | @bazel/labs | ^0.42.3 | package.json |
| npm | @bazel/rollup | ^3.0.0 | package.json |
| npm | @bazel/typescript | ^3.0.0 | package.json |
| npm | @google-cloud/bigquery | ~8.3.0 | package.json |
| npm | @google-cloud/storage | ^7.19.0 | package.json |
| npm | google-auth-library | ^9.15.1 | package.json |
| npm | @rollup/plugin-node-resolve | ^7.1.3 | package.json |
| npm | @types/chai | ^4.1.7 | package.json |
| npm | @types/diff | ^4.0.2 | package.json |
| npm | @types/es6-shim | ^0.31.37 | package.json |
| npm | @types/fs-extra | ^8.1.0 | package.json |
| npm | @types/glob | ^8.1.0 | package.json |
| npm | @types/js-beautify | ^1.8.1 | package.json |
| npm | @types/js-yaml | ^4.0.5 | package.json |
| npm | @types/json-stable-stringify | ^1.0.32 | package.json |
| npm | @types/long | ^4.0.0 | package.json |
| npm | @types/moo | ^0.5.0 | package.json |
| npm | @types/node | ^16.16.0 | package.json |
| npm | @types/pg | ^8.11.0 | package.json |
| npm | @types/readline-sync | ^1.4.3 | package.json |
| npm | @types/request | ^2.48.3 | package.json |
| npm | @types/rimraf | ^2.0.2 | package.json |
| npm | @types/semver | ^7.3.13 | package.json |
| npm | @types/tmp | ^0.2.0 | package.json |
| npm | @types/uuid | ^9.0.0 | package.json |
| npm | @types/vscode | ^1.45.1 | package.json |
| npm | @types/yargs | ^15.0.5 | package.json |
| npm | @typescript-eslint/parser | ^5.62.0 | package.json |
| npm | chai | ^4.2.0 | package.json |
| npm | chalk | ^4.0.0 | package.json |
| npm | chokidar | ^3.5.3 | package.json |
| npm | deepmerge | ^4.2.2 | package.json |
| npm | diff | ^8.0.3 | package.json |
| npm | @duckdb/node-api | ^1.5.4-r.1 | package.json |
| npm | escodegen | ^1.13.0 | package.json |
| npm | eslint | ^8.57.0 | package.json |
| npm | espree | ^7.0.0 | package.json |
| npm | estraverse | ^5.1.0 | package.json |
| npm | fs-extra | ^9.0.0 | package.json |
| npm | glob | 13.0.6 | package.json |
| npm | google-sql-syntax-ts | ^1.0.3 | package.json |
| npm | js-beautify | ^1.10.2 | package.json |
| npm | js-yaml | ^4.2.0 | package.json |
| npm | jsdoc | ^3.6.11 | package.json |
| npm | json-stable-stringify | ^1.0.1 | package.json |
| npm | long | ^4.0.0 | package.json |
| npm | minimist | ^1.2.6 | package.json |
| npm | moo | ^0.5.0 | package.json |
| npm | mysql2 | ^3.11.0 | package.json |
| npm | object-sizeof | ^1.6.1 | package.json |
| npm | parse-duration | ^1.0.0 | package.json |
| npm | pg | ^8.11.3 | package.json |
| npm | pg-query-stream | ^4.5.3 | package.json |
| npm | prettier | ^1.14.2 | package.json |
| npm | promise-pool-executor | ^1.1.1 | package.json |
| npm | protobufjs | ^7.6.5 | package.json |
| npm | protobufjs-cli | ^1.3.3 | package.json |
| npm | readline-sync | ^1.4.9 | package.json |
| npm | request | ^2.88.0 | package.json |
| npm | rimraf | ^2.6.2 | package.json |
| npm | rollup | ^2.80.0 | package.json |
| npm | rollup-plugin-dts | ^1.4.0 | package.json |
| npm | semver | ^7.5.2 | package.json |
| npm | source-map-support | ^0.5.21 | package.json |
| npm | tarjan-graph | ^2.0.0 | package.json |
| npm | tmp | ^0.2.7 | package.json |
| npm | ts-loader | ^5.3.1 | package.json |
| npm | ts-mockito | ^2.6.1 | package.json |
| npm | tslint | ^5.14.0 | package.json |
| npm | tslint-config-prettier | ^1.18.0 | package.json |
| npm | tslint-config-security | ^1.16.0 | package.json |
| npm | typedoc | 0.17.8 | package.json |
| npm | typedoc-plugin-markdown | 2.2.17 | package.json |
| npm | typeid-js | 0.3.0 | package.json |
| npm | typescript | ^3.8.3 | package.json |
| npm | uglify-es | ^3.3.9 | package.json |
| npm | uglify-js | ^3.7.7 | package.json |
| npm | untildify | ^4.0.0 | package.json |
| npm | url | ^0.11.0 | package.json |
| npm | uuid | ^9.0.0 | package.json |
| npm | vm2 | 3.11.6 | package.json |
| npm | vsce | ^1.79.5 | package.json |
| npm | vscode-jsonrpc | ^5.0.1 | package.json |
| npm | vscode-languageclient | ^6.1.3 | package.json |
| npm | vscode-languageserver | ^6.1.1 | package.json |
| npm | vscode-languageserver-protocol | ^3.15.3 | package.json |
| npm | vscode-languageserver-textdocument | ^1.0.1 | package.json |
| npm | vscode-languageserver-types | 3.15.1 | package.json |
| npm | webpack | 5.104.1 | package.json |
| npm | webpack-cli | 4.10.0 | package.json |
| npm | yargs | ^16.2.0 | package.json |
| npm | vscode-languageclient | ^6.1.3 | vscode/package.json |
| npm | vscode-languageserver | ^6.1.1 | vscode/package.json |
| npm | vscode-languageserver-textdocument | ^1.0.1 | vscode/package.json |
All dependencies not collected
The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.