Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 23:04 UTC

SpanPanel / span-panel-api

Python API client for SPAN Panel - provides async interface to control circuits, monitor power usage, and manage panel settings

PythonMIT★ 3 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Jun 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#api-client#async#home-assistant#openapi#pypi#python#span-panel

SpanPanel/span-panel-api holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (34/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SpanPanelOrganization
9 followers7 public repossince Jun 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIspan-panel-api3.6.22,0986211 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

84Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
20.1/36Commit cadence — 29/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 470 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year470
human_commit_share0.94
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year29

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 96 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 5 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count96
latest_release_tagschema-1-v1.4.0b2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases0.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

34At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

7Critical
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars — 3 stars
2.5/25Forks — 3 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars3
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges12
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

55Moderate
How it's scored
44.3/80Monthly downloads — 2,098 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesspan-panel-api
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,098
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

18Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.993

Issue & PR responsiveness

69Good
How it's scored
30/42Issue resolution — 71% of issues closed
26/30PR acceptance — 182/210 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs182
open_issues2
closed_issues5
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d35
prs_decided_30d35
issue_closed_ratio0.714
closed_unmerged_prs28
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1

Ownership & stewardship

48Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
7.2/25Owner reach — 9 followers of SpanPanel
11.3/25Track record — 7 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers9
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginSpanPanel
public_repos7
account_age_days862

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 11 days ago
20/20Version history — 62 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesspan-panel-api
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish11

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.pylint], [tool.black])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsapi-client, async, home-assistant, openapi, pypi, python, span-panel
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

58Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages9
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:span-panel-api@3.6.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 9 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 91 of 94 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.968
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

66Good
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.pylint], [tool.black])
11/11Static type checking — packages/schema-0/src/span_panel_api_schema_0/py.typed, packages/schema-1/src/span_panel_api_schema_1/py.typed, src/span_panel_api/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspackages/schema-0/src/span_panel_api_schema_0/py.typed, packages/schema-1/src/span_panel_api_schema_1/py.typed, src/span_panel_api/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.03

Code legibility for models

81Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (packages/schema-0/src/span_panel_api_schema_0/py.typed, packages/schema-1/src/span_panel_api_schema_1/py.typed, src/span_panel_api/py.typed)
53.7/55Manageable file sizes — 3/126 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes95,488
source_files_sampled126
oversized_source_files3

Machine-readable interfaces

50Moderate
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — openapi.json
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesopenapi.json
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

3GitHub stars
4contributors
470commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
96releases
1bus factor
2open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿
0Stars
3Forks
65Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12233312026-012026-052026-10
Major 2Minor 10Patch 21
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10
5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 23:04 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIhttpx>=0.28.1,<1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpaho-mqtt>=2.0.0,<3.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 80

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 77 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPIpaho-mqtt2.1.0direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIastroid4.0.4indirect
PyPIbandit1.9.4indirect
PyPIblack26.3.1indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.2.25indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.6indirect
PyPIclick8.3.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.13.5indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIdill0.4.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIebus-mqtt-client0.5.0indirect
PyPIebus-panel-sim0.8.0indirect
PyPIebus-sdk—indirect
PyPIebus-sdk0.22.0indirect
PyPIfilelock3.25.2indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIid1.6.1indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.18indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIisort8.0.1indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.1indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.4.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.8.1indirect
PyPImando0.7.1indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools10.8.0indirect
PyPImypy1.19.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInh30.3.3indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpathspec1.0.4indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.9.4indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.5.1indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpylint4.0.5indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.3.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.0.0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.6.1indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIradon6.0.1indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer44.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.33.0indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrich14.3.3indirect
PyPIruff0.15.7indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIspan-panel-api—indirect
PyPIspan-panel-api3.7.0b1indirect
PyPIspan-panel-api-schema-01.3.0b1indirect
PyPIspan-panel-api-schema-11.3.0b1indirect
PyPIstevedore5.7.0indirect
PyPItomlkit0.14.0indirect
PyPItwine7.0.0indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20250915indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.7.13indirect
PyPIvulture2.15indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:span-panel-api@3.6.2 pulls in 9 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with SpanPanel/span-panel-api. Read them side by side →

99pypa/cibuildwheel🎡 Build Python wheels for all the platforms with minimal configuration. Exceptional99litestar-org/litestarLight, flexible and extensible ASGI framework | Built to scaleExceptional98esphome/esphomeESPHome is a system to control your ESP32, ESP8266, BK72xx, RP2040 by simple yet powerful configuration files and control them remotely through Home Automation systems.Exceptional98pypa/pipxInstall and Run Python Applications in Isolated EnvironmentsExceptional98strawberry-graphql/strawberryA GraphQL library for Python that leverages type annotations 🍓Exceptional98python-trio/trioTrio – a friendly Python library for async concurrency and I/OExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.