Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 21:29 UTC

litestar-org / litestar

Light, flexible and extensible ASGI framework | Built to scale

PythonMIT★ 8,423 stars⑂ 618 forkssince Dec 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined
#python#api#rest#pydantic#asgi#openapi#redoc#starlite#swagger#litestar#litestar-framework#litestar-api#asyncio#msgspec#rapidoc

litestar-org/litestar holds a health index of 99 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Security (74/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

99
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

99
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 89 is calibrated to 99 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

LitestarOrganization · verified domain
403 followers51 public repossince Jan 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIlitestar2.24.02,123,2466577 days agoapiasgilitestarreststarlite

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

98Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
33.9/36Commit cadence — 49/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 336 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year336
human_commit_share0.66
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year49

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 77 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~44.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2.24.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release77
mean_days_between_releases44.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

94Exceptional · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

92Excellent
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 8,423 stars
23.3/25Forks — 618 forks
9.1/15Watchers — 44 watchers
Inputs used
forks618
stars8,423
watchers44
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges21
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 2,123,246 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageslitestar
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,123,246
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

86Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

76Good
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 26% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 53 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.259

Issue & PR responsiveness

82Excellent
How it's scored
35.7/42Issue resolution — 85% of issues closed
25.2/30PR acceptance — 2,622/3,124 decided PRs merged
7.1/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 6/11 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 23/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs2,622
open_issues220
closed_issues1,255
prs_merged_7d3
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d24
prs_decided_30d31
issue_closed_ratio0.851
closed_unmerged_prs502
first_time_authors_30d10
first_time_prs_merged_30d6
first_time_prs_decided_30d11

Ownership & stewardship

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
18.7/25Owner reach — 403 followers of litestar-org
21.8/25Track record — 51 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers403
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginlitestar-org
public_repos51
account_age_days1,694

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 77 days ago
20/20Version history — 65 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageslitestar
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish77

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.litestar.dev/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 15 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspython, api, rest, pydantic, asgi, openapi, redoc, starlite, swagger, litestar, litestar-framework, litestar-api, asyncio, msgspec, rapidoc
has_wikino
homepagehttps://docs.litestar.dev/
docs_sitehttps://docs.litestar.dev/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

68Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 23/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 53 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages21
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:litestar@2.24.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 21 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

76Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.pydantic.dev/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 66 of 66 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.pydantic.dev/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

80Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — litestar/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 34 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configslitestar/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.34

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (litestar/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 1/1,135 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes72,194
source_files_sampled1,135
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

8,423GitHub stars
98contributors
336commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
100releases
3bus factor
220open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 16 authors (cap 12)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 618 ⇿
0Stars
618Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0125250375500625616172021-122024-042026-08
Major 1Minor 36Patch 51

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.8 / 10
6.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 21:28 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 23/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 53 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIanyio>=3pyproject.toml
PyPImsgspec>=0.19.0pyproject.toml
PyPImultidict>=6.0.2pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions—pyproject.toml
PyPImultipart>=1.3.1pyproject.toml
PyPIsniffio>=1.3.1pyproject.toml
All dependencies 229

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 223 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIanyio4.13.0direct
PyPImsgspec0.20.0direct
PyPImultidict6.7.1direct
PyPImultipart1.3.1direct
PyPIsniffio1.3.1direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0direct
PyPIadvanced-alchemy1.10.0indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.1indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIaiosqlite0.22.1indirect
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIalembic1.18.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIapeye1.4.1indirect
PyPIapeye-core1.1.5indirect
PyPIasgiref3.11.1indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIasyncpg0.31.0indirect
PyPIasyncpg-stubs0.31.2indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIauto-pytabs0.5.0indirect
PyPIautobahn25.12.2indirect
PyPIautodocsumm0.2.6indirect
PyPIautomat25.4.16indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackports-zstd1.3.0indirect
PyPIbeanie2.1.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.14.3indirect
PyPIblack26.3.1indirect
PyPIbrotli1.2.0indirect
PyPIcachecontrol0.14.4indirect
PyPIcbor25.9.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.2.25indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.6indirect
PyPIclick8.2.1indirect
PyPIcodecov-cli11.2.7indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIconstantly23.10.4indirect
PyPIcovdefaults2.3.0indirect
PyPIcoverage7.13.5indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIcssutils2.11.1indirect
PyPIdaphne4.2.2indirect
PyPIdict2css0.3.0.post1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIdnspython2.8.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.17.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.21.2indirect
PyPIdomdf-python-tools3.10.0indirect
PyPIduckdb1.5.2indirect
PyPIduckdb-engine0.17.0indirect
PyPIeditorconfig0.17.1indirect
PyPIemail-validator2.3.0indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIfaker40.11.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.25.2indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.2.0indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.3.2indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIh24.4.1indirect
PyPIhiredis3.3.1indirect
PyPIhpack4.2.0indirect
PyPIhtml5lib1.1indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttptools0.7.1indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhttpx-sse0.4.3indirect
PyPIhypercorn0.18.0indirect
PyPIhyperframe6.1.0indirect
PyPIhyperlink21.0.0indirect
PyPIhypothesis6.151.9indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.18indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPIijson3.5.0indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.7.1indirect
PyPIincremental24.11.0indirect
PyPIinflection0.5.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjsbeautifier1.15.4indirect
PyPIlazy-model0.4.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.8.1indirect
PyPIlibvalkey4.0.1indirect
PyPIlitestar3.0.0b0indirect
PyPIlitestar-htmx0.5.0indirect
PyPIlitestar-piccolo0.1.0indirect
PyPIlitestar-sphinx-theme0.3.1indirect
PyPImako1.3.12indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPIminijinja2.18.0indirect
PyPImore-itertools10.8.0indirect
PyPImsgpack1.2.1indirect
PyPImypy1.19.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInatsort8.4.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.39.1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation0.60b1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-asgi0.60b1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk1.39.1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-semantic-conventions0.60b1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-util-http0.60b1indirect
PyPIoutcome1.3.0.post0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.0indirect
PyPIpathspec1.0.4indirect
PyPIpiccolo1.33.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.9.4indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpolyfactory3.3.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.5.1indirect
PyPIpriority2.0.0indirect
PyPIprometheus-client0.24.1indirect
PyPIpropcache0.4.1indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIpsycopg3.3.4indirect
PyPIpsycopg-binary3.3.4indirect
PyPIpsycopg-pool3.3.0indirect
PyPIpsycopg2-binary2.9.11indirect
PyPIpy-ubjson0.16.1indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.4indirect
PyPIpyasn1-modules0.4.2indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.12.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-extra-types2.11.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpygments-styles0.3.0indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.13.0indirect
PyPIpymongo4.16.0indirect
PyPIpyopenssl26.4.0indirect
PyPIpyright1.1.408indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.3.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-lazy-fixtures1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.15.1indirect
PyPIpytest-rerunfailures16.1indirect
PyPIpytest-timeout2.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.2.0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIredis7.4.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.33.0indirect
PyPIresponses0.21.0indirect
PyPIrich14.3.3indirect
PyPIrich-click1.9.8indirect
PyPIroman5.2indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml0.18.16indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml-clib0.2.15indirect
PyPIruff0.15.7indirect
PyPIsentry-sdk2.56.0indirect
PyPIservice-identity24.2.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools83.0.0indirect
PyPIshibuya2026.1.9indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIslotscheck0.19.1indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.0.1indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.8.4indirect
PyPIsphinx9.0.4indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-autobuild2025.8.25indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints3.5.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-click6.2.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-copybutton0.5.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-design0.7.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-jinja2-compat0.4.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-paramlinks0.6.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-prompt1.10.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-tabs3.4.5indirect
PyPIsphinx-togglebutton0.4.4indirect
PyPIsphinx-toolbox4.1.2indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-mermaid2.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.48indirect
PyPIstandard-imghdr3.10.14indirect
PyPIstarlette1.3.1indirect
PyPIstructlog25.5.0indirect
PyPItabulate0.10.0indirect
PyPItarg0.6.0indirect
PyPItest-results-parser0.6.1indirect
PyPItime-machine3.2.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItrio0.33.0indirect
PyPItwisted25.5.0indirect
PyPItxaio25.12.2indirect
PyPItypes-beautifulsoup44.12.0.20250516indirect
PyPItypes-cffi2.0.0.20260316indirect
PyPItypes-html5lib1.1.11.20251117indirect
PyPItypes-psutil7.2.2.20260130indirect
PyPItypes-pyopenssl24.1.0.20240722indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20250915indirect
PyPItypes-redis4.6.0.20241004indirect
PyPItypes-setuptools82.0.0.20260210indirect
PyPItypes-webencodings0.5.0.20251108indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2025.3indirect
PyPIu-msgpack-python2.8.0indirect
PyPIujson5.13.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.42.0indirect
PyPIuvloop0.22.1indirect
PyPIvalkey6.1.1indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.2.0indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.1.1indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIwebsockets16.0indirect
PyPIwheel0.46.3indirect
PyPIwrapt1.17.3indirect
PyPIwsproto1.3.2indirect
PyPIyarl1.23.0indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.0indirect
PyPIzope-interface8.2indirect
PyPIzstandard0.25.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:litestar@2.24.0 pulls in 21 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with litestar-org/litestar. Read them side by side →

98strawberry-graphql/strawberryA GraphQL library for Python that leverages type annotations 🍓Exceptional100scalar/scalarScalar is an open-source API platform:　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　🌐 Modern REST API Client　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　📖 Beautiful API References　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　✨ 1st-Class OpenAPI/Swagger SupportExceptional99swagger-api/swagger-uiSwagger UI is a collection of HTML, JavaScript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation from a Swagger-compliant API.Exceptional98api-platform/coreThe server component of API Platform: hypermedia and GraphQL APIs in minutesExceptional99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional99ag2ai/faststreamAsynchronous Python framework for event-driven services. A thin client for Kafka, RabbitMQ, NATS, Redis and MQTT with full access to native broker features, plus AsyncAPI docs, in-memory tests and observability out of the box.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.