Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-17 04:24 UTC

SpiriitLabs / form-filter-bundle

This Symfony bundle aim to provide classes to build some form filters and then build a doctrine query from this form filter.

PHPMIT★ 39 stars⑂ 15 forkssince Jun 2023View on GitHub ↗

KindPluginNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined

SpiriitLabs/form-filter-bundle holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (80/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (49/100). It was last updated 9 days ago. 7 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SpiriitOrganization

6 followers13 public repossince Jul 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	spiriitlabs/form-filter-bundle	v12.3.0	27,110	75	9 days ago	symfony admin form search doctrine filter datatable criteria backoffice listing query-builder symfony-bundle doctrine-orm dynamic-filter search-form

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

67Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

50Moderate

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 9 days ago
6.2/36	Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
9.7/18	Commit volume — 11 commits in the last year
5/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

commits_last_year	11
human_commit_share	0.96
days_since_last_push	9
active_weeks_last_year	9

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 22 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 9 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~61.2 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	22
latest_release_tag	v12.3.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	9
mean_days_between_releases	61.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

38Weak

How it's scored

25.6/60	Stars — 39 stars
9.6/25	Forks — 15 forks
2.7/15	Watchers — 4 watchers

Inputs used

forks	15
stars	39
watchers	4
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	4
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, poser.pugx.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

65Good

How it's scored

59.1/80	Monthly downloads — 27,110 downloads/month across packagist
6/20	Registry dependents — 7 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	spiriitlabs/form-filter-bundle
dependents	7
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	610,365
monthly_downloads	27,110
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

80Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

94Exceptional

How it's scored

51.3/54	Bus factor — 7 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
19.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 15% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 65 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 25 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	7
contributors_sampled	65
top_contributor_share	0.149

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good

How it's scored

0/42	Issue resolution — no issues or no data
25.1/30	PR acceptance — 41/49 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 17/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

merged_prs	41
open_issues	0
closed_issues	0
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	3
prs_decided_30d	3
issue_closed_ratio	—
closed_unmerged_prs	8
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

53Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
6.1/25	Owner reach — 6 followers of SpiriitLabs
16.7/25	Track record — 13 public repos, account ~4 yr old

Inputs used

followers	6
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	SpiriitLabs
public_repos	13
account_age_days	1,534

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 9 days ago
20/20	Version history — 75 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	spiriitlabs/form-filter-bundle
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	9

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

54Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
6/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

52Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0.8/2.5	CI-Tests — 7 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5	Code-Review — Found 17/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 25 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
3.8/7.5	Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	5.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	130
unassessed_packages	15
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 130 resolved dependencies against OSV. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 80 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.833
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	10,408

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

44Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	yarn.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.04

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/86 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	14,072
source_files_sampled	86
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

39GitHub stars

65contributors

11commits, last 12 months

9days since last push

22releases

7bus factor

0open issues

npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 15 ⇿

0Stars

15Forks

17Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 3Minor 1Patch 13

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10

5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-17 04:24 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
3	CI-Tests	7 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6	Code-Review	Found 17/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10	Contributors	project has 25 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
5	Maintained	6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 4

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	doctrine/orm	`^3.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`^3.5`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/form	`^5.4\|^6.4\|^7.4\|^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/framework-bundle	`^5.4\|^6.4\|^7.4\|^8.0`	composer.json

All dependencies 145

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 141 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	doctrine/orm	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/form	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/framework-bundle	`—`	direct
npm	@babel/helper-string-parser	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/parser	`7.29.8`	indirect
npm	@babel/types	`7.29.8`	indirect
npm	@docsearch/css	`4.7.0`	indirect
npm	@docsearch/js	`4.7.0`	indirect
npm	@docsearch/sidepanel-js	`4.7.0`	indirect
npm	@iconify-json/simple-icons	`1.2.94`	indirect
npm	@iconify/types	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	@oxc-project/types	`0.148.0`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-android-arm-eabi	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-android-arm64	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm64	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-x64	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x64	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm64	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/pluginutils	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/core	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/engine-javascript	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/engine-oniguruma	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/langs	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/primitive	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/themes	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/transformers	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/types	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/vscode-textmate	`10.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/hast	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@types/linkify-it	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	@types/markdown-it	`14.2.0`	indirect
npm	@types/mdast	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	@types/mdurl	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	@types/unist	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	@types/web-bluetooth	`0.0.21`	indirect
npm	@ungap/structured-clone	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	@vitejs/plugin-vue	`6.0.8`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-core	`3.5.42`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-dom	`3.5.42`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-sfc	`3.5.42`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-ssr	`3.5.42`	indirect
npm	@vue/devtools-api	`8.2.1`	indirect
npm	@vue/devtools-kit	`8.2.1`	indirect
npm	@vue/devtools-shared	`8.2.1`	indirect
npm	@vue/reactivity	`3.5.42`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-core	`3.5.42`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-dom	`3.5.42`	indirect
npm	@vue/server-renderer	`3.5.42`	indirect
npm	@vue/shared	`3.5.42`	indirect
npm	@vueuse/core	`14.4.0`	indirect
npm	@vueuse/integrations	`14.4.0`	indirect
npm	@vueuse/metadata	`14.4.0`	indirect
npm	@vueuse/shared	`14.4.0`	indirect
npm	birpc	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	ccount	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	character-entities-html4	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	character-entities-legacy	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	comma-separated-tokens	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	csstype	`3.2.3`	indirect
npm	dequal	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	devlop	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	entities	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	focus-trap	`8.2.2`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	hast-util-to-html	`9.0.5`	indirect
npm	hast-util-whitespace	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	hookable	`5.5.3`	indirect
npm	html-void-elements	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-android-arm64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-arm64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-x64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-freebsd-x64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-musl	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.21`	indirect
npm	mark.js	`8.11.1`	indirect
npm	mdast-util-to-hast	`13.2.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-character	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-encode	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-sanitize-uri	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-symbol	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-types	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	minisearch	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.18`	indirect
npm	oniguruma-parser	`0.12.2`	indirect
npm	oniguruma-to-es	`4.3.6`	indirect
npm	perfect-debounce	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.7`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.28`	indirect
npm	property-information	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	regex	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	regex-recursion	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	regex-utilities	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	rolldown	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	shiki	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	space-separated-tokens	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	stringify-entities	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	tabbable	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	trim-lines	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	unist-util-is	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	unist-util-position	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	unist-util-stringify-position	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	unist-util-visit	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	unist-util-visit-parents	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	vfile	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	vfile-message	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	vite	`8.2.2`	indirect
npm	vitepress	`2.0.0-alpha.19`	indirect
npm	vue	`3.5.42`	indirect
npm	zwitch	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/annotations	`—`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/doctrine-bundle	`—`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	rector/rector	`—`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/phpunit-bridge	`—`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/var-dumper	`—`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/var-exporter	`—`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/web-profiler-bundle	`—`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/yaml	`—`	indirect
Packagist	symplify/easy-coding-standard	`—`	indirect
Packagist	twig/twig	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 130 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records