Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 08:24 UTC

SteeltoeOSS / Steeltoe

.NET Components for Externalized Configuration, Database Connectors, Service Discovery, Logging and Distributed Tracing, Application Management, Security, and more.

C#Apache-2.0★ 1,098 stars⑂ 172 forkssince Apr 2019View on GitHub ↗

SteeltoeOSS/Steeltoe holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (73/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 81 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Steeltoe OSSOrganization · verified domain
96 followers42 public repossince Nov 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
24.9/36Commit cadence36/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume111 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year111
human_commit_share0.97
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year36
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases46 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 5 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~94.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count46
latest_release_tag4.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases94.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

84Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
49.3/60Stars1,098 stars
18.6/25Forks172 forks
8.9/15Watchers41 watchers
Inputs used
forks172
stars1,098
watchers41
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io, sonarcloud.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

80Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 41% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth61 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled61
top_contributor_share0.407
How it's scored
40.3/42Issue resolution96% of issues closed
26.8/30PR acceptance850/953 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs850
open_issues31
closed_issues738
prs_merged_7d10
prs_decided_7d10
prs_merged_30d11
prs_decided_30d11
issue_closed_ratio0.96
closed_unmerged_prs103
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
14.3/25Owner reach96 followers of SteeltoeOSS
23.9/25Track record42 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers96
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginSteeltoeOSS
public_repos42
account_age_days3,954

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

73Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows13 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests22 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://steeltoe.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsmicroservices, cloud-native, application-monitoring, configuration, service-discovery, load-balancer, dotnet-core, dotnet
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://steeltoe.io
docs_sitehttps://steeltoe.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

75Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests22 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages1
unassessed_packages81
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 1 resolved dependencies against OSV. 81 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

79Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history78 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.804
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,047
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/Bootstrap/src/AutoConfiguration/Steeltoe.Bootstrap.AutoConfiguration.csproj, src/Bootstrap/test/AutoConfiguration.Test/Steeltoe.Bootstrap.AutoConfiguration.Test.csproj, src/Bootstrap/test/EmptyAutoConfiguration.Test/Steeltoe.Bootstrap.EmptyAutoConfiguration.Test.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice5 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.05
toolchain_manifestssrc/Bootstrap/src/AutoConfiguration/Steeltoe.Bootstrap.AutoConfiguration.csproj, src/Bootstrap/test/AutoConfiguration.Test/Steeltoe.Bootstrap.AutoConfiguration.Test.csproj, src/Bootstrap/test/EmptyAutoConfiguration.Test/Steeltoe.Bootstrap.EmptyAutoConfiguration.Test.csproj, src/Common/src/Certificates/Steeltoe.Common.Certificates.csproj, src/Common/src/Common/Steeltoe.Common.csproj, src/Common/src/Hosting/Steeltoe.Common.Hosting.csproj, src/Common/src/Http/Steeltoe.Common.Http.csproj, src/Common/src/Logging/Steeltoe.Common.Logging.csproj, src/Common/src/Net/Steeltoe.Common.Net.csproj, src/Common/test/Certificates.Test/Steeltoe.Common.Certificates.Test.csproj, src/Common/test/Common.Test/Steeltoe.Common.Test.csproj, src/Common/test/Hosting.Test/Steeltoe.Common.Hosting.Test.csproj, src/Common/test/Http.Test/Steeltoe.Common.Http.Test.csproj, src/Common/test/Logging.Test/Steeltoe.Common.Logging.Test.csproj, src/Common/test/Net.Test/Steeltoe.Common.Net.Test.csproj, src/Common/test/TestResources/Steeltoe.Common.TestResources.csproj, src/Configuration/src/Abstractions/Steeltoe.Configuration.Abstractions.csproj, src/Configuration/src/CloudFoundry/Steeltoe.Configuration.CloudFoundry.csproj, src/Configuration/src/ConfigServer/Steeltoe.Configuration.ConfigServer.csproj, src/Configuration/src/Encryption/Steeltoe.Configuration.Encryption.csproj, src/Configuration/src/Kubernetes.ServiceBindings/Steeltoe.Configuration.Kubernetes.ServiceBindings.csproj, src/Configuration/src/Placeholder/Steeltoe.Configuration.Placeholder.csproj, src/Configuration/src/RandomValue/Steeltoe.Configuration.RandomValue.csproj, src/Configuration/src/SpringBoot/Steeltoe.Configuration.SpringBoot.csproj, src/Configuration/test/CloudFoundry.Test/Steeltoe.Configuration.CloudFoundry.Test.csproj, src/Configuration/test/ConfigServer.Discovery.Test/Steeltoe.Configuration.ConfigServer.Discovery.Test.csproj, src/Configuration/test/ConfigServer.Integration.Test/Steeltoe.Configuration.ConfigServer.Integration.Test.csproj, src/Configuration/test/ConfigServer.Test/Steeltoe.Configuration.ConfigServer.Test.csproj, src/Configuration/test/Encryption.Test/Steeltoe.Configuration.Encryption.Test.csproj, src/Configuration/test/Kubernetes.ServiceBindings.Test/Steeltoe.Configuration.Kubernetes.ServiceBindings.Test.csproj, src/Configuration/test/Placeholder.Test/Steeltoe.Configuration.Placeholder.Test.csproj, src/Configuration/test/RandomValue.Test/Steeltoe.Configuration.RandomValue.Test.csproj, src/Configuration/test/SpringBoot.Test/Steeltoe.Configuration.SpringBoot.Test.csproj, src/Connectors/src/Connectors/Steeltoe.Connectors.csproj, src/Connectors/src/EntityFrameworkCore/Steeltoe.Connectors.EntityFrameworkCore.csproj, src/Connectors/test/Connectors.Test/Steeltoe.Connectors.Test.csproj, src/Connectors/test/EntityFrameworkCore.Test/Steeltoe.Connectors.EntityFrameworkCore.Test.csproj, src/Discovery/src/Configuration/Steeltoe.Discovery.Configuration.csproj, src/Discovery/src/Consul/Steeltoe.Discovery.Consul.csproj, src/Discovery/src/Eureka/Steeltoe.Discovery.Eureka.csproj, src/Discovery/src/HttpClients/Steeltoe.Discovery.HttpClients.csproj, src/Discovery/test/Configuration.Test/Steeltoe.Discovery.Configuration.Test.csproj, src/Discovery/test/Consul.Test/Steeltoe.Discovery.Consul.Test.csproj, src/Discovery/test/Eureka.Test/Steeltoe.Discovery.Eureka.Test.csproj, src/Discovery/test/HttpClients.Test/Steeltoe.Discovery.HttpClients.Test.csproj, src/Logging/src/Abstractions/Steeltoe.Logging.Abstractions.csproj, src/Logging/src/DynamicConsole/Steeltoe.Logging.DynamicConsole.csproj, src/Logging/src/DynamicSerilog/Steeltoe.Logging.DynamicSerilog.csproj, src/Logging/test/DynamicConsole.Test/Steeltoe.Logging.DynamicConsole.Test.csproj, src/Logging/test/DynamicSerilog.Test/Steeltoe.Logging.DynamicSerilog.Test.csproj, src/Management/src/Abstractions/Steeltoe.Management.Abstractions.csproj, src/Management/src/Endpoint/Steeltoe.Management.Endpoint.csproj, src/Management/src/GitProperties.Build/Steeltoe.Management.GitProperties.Build.csproj, src/Management/src/Prometheus/Steeltoe.Management.Prometheus.csproj, src/Management/src/Tasks/Steeltoe.Management.Tasks.csproj, src/Management/src/Tracing/Steeltoe.Management.Tracing.csproj, src/Management/test/Endpoint.Test/Steeltoe.Management.Endpoint.Test.csproj, src/Management/test/GitProperties.Build.Test/Steeltoe.Management.GitProperties.Build.Test.csproj, src/Management/test/Prometheus.Test/Steeltoe.Management.Prometheus.Test.csproj, src/Management/test/RazorPagesTestWebApp/Steeltoe.Management.Endpoint.RazorPagesTestWebApp.csproj, src/Management/test/Tasks.Test/Steeltoe.Management.Tasks.Test.csproj, src/Management/test/Tracing.Test/Steeltoe.Management.Tracing.Test.csproj, src/Security/src/Authentication.JwtBearer/Steeltoe.Security.Authentication.JwtBearer.csproj, src/Security/src/Authentication.OpenIdConnect/Steeltoe.Security.Authentication.OpenIdConnect.csproj, src/Security/src/Authorization.Certificate/Steeltoe.Security.Authorization.Certificate.csproj, src/Security/src/DataProtection.Redis/Steeltoe.Security.DataProtection.Redis.csproj, src/Security/test/Authentication.JwtBearer.Test/Steeltoe.Security.Authentication.JwtBearer.Test.csproj, src/Security/test/Authentication.OpenIdConnect.Test/Steeltoe.Security.Authentication.OpenIdConnect.Test.csproj, src/Security/test/Authorization.Certificate.Test/Steeltoe.Security.Authorization.Certificate.Test.csproj, src/Security/test/DataProtection.Redis.Test/Steeltoe.Security.DataProtection.Redis.Test.csproj, src/Tools/src/ConfigurationSchemaGenerator/ConfigurationSchemaGenerator.csproj, src/Tools/test/ConfigurationSchemaGenerator.Tests/ConfigurationSchemaGenerator.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/1,079 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes52,162
source_files_sampled1,079
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,098GitHub stars
61contributors
111commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
46releases
2bus factor
31open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 172 ⇿
0Stars
172Forks
45Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020016842019-042022-122026-08
Major 2Minor 9Patch 22

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.9 / 10
6.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 08:24 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests22 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
9SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 82

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 82 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAspNetCore.HealthChecks.Systemindirect
NuGetAutofacindirect
NuGetBouncyCastle.NetCoreindirect
NuGetConsulindirect
NuGetdotnet-gcdumpindirect
NuGetFluentAssertionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.Certificateindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearerindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.OpenIdConnectindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection.StackExchangeRedisindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Hostingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.TestHostindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.Cosmosindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Utilities.Coreindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspacesindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClientindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Diagnostics.NETCore.Clientindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Diagnostics.Tracing.TraceEventindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.InMemoryindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relationalindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Sqliteindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServerindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Caching.Abstractionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Caching.Memoryindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Caching.StackExchangeRedisindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configurationindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binderindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.CommandLineindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.FileExtensionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Jsonindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjectionindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.HealthChecks.Abstractionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.HealthChecks.EntityFrameworkCoreindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.FileProviders.Physicalindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hostingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Httpindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Consoleindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Optionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdkindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHubindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.TargetingPack.NETFramework.v4.6.11.0.1indirect
NuGetMicroting.EntityFrameworkCore.MySqlindirect
NuGetMongoDB.Driverindirect
NuGetMySql.Dataindirect
NuGetMySql.EntityFrameworkCoreindirect
NuGetMySqlConnectorindirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Jsonindirect
NuGetNpgsqlindirect
NuGetNpgsql.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQLindirect
NuGetNSubstituteindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetryindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Exporter.Prometheus.AspNetCoreindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Extensions.Hostingindirect
NuGetPomelo.EntityFrameworkCore.MySqlindirect
NuGetPortable.BouncyCastleindirect
NuGetRabbitMQ.Clientindirect
NuGetRichardSzalay.MockHttpindirect
NuGetSerilog.Enrichers.Threadindirect
NuGetSerilog.Exceptionsindirect
NuGetSerilog.Extensions.Loggingindirect
NuGetSerilog.Settings.Configurationindirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Consoleindirect
NuGetSteeltoe.Commonindirect
NuGetStyleCop.Analyzersindirect
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutableindirect
NuGetSystem.CommandLineindirect
NuGetSystem.Data.SqlClientindirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.DiagnosticSourceindirect
NuGetSystem.IdentityModel.Tokens.Jwtindirect
NuGetSystem.Net.Httpindirect
NuGetSystem.Reactiveindirect
NuGetSystem.Reactive.Observable.Aliasesindirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Jsonindirect
NuGetxunitindirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudioindirect
NuGetxunit.v3.assertindirect
NuGetxunit.v3.extensibility.coreindirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 1 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 81 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.