Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 21:17 UTC

SteveDunn / Intellenum

Intelligent Enums

C#Apache-2.0★ 240 stars⑂ 7 forkssince Feb 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

SteveDunn/Intellenum holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (70/100) and lowest on Vitality (39/100). It was last updated 215 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Steve DunnPersonal account
126 followers68 public repossince May 2010

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetIntellenum2.0.1-7291 days agoenums

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

39Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

19Critical
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recency — last push 215 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence — 6/52 weeks with commits
11.1/18Commit volume — 16 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year16
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push215
active_weeks_last_year6

Release discipline

70Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 16 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 291 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~100.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count16
latest_release_tag2.0.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release291
mean_days_between_releases100.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

69Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

48Weak
How it's scored
38.6/60Stars — 240 stars
6.5/25Forks — 7 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks7
stars240
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

80Excellent
How it's scored
63.9/80Total downloads — 1,420,606 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesIntellenum
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads1,420,606
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

51Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 81% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.814

Issue & PR responsiveness

44Weak
How it's scored
29.6/42Issue resolution — 70% of issues closed
8.5/30PR acceptance — 37/131 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs37
open_issues8
closed_issues19
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.704
closed_unmerged_prs94
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

63Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
15.1/25Owner reach — 126 followers of SteveDunn
25/25Track record — 68 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers126
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginSteveDunn
public_repos68
account_age_days5,920
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

91Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 291 days ago
20/20Version history — 7 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesIntellenum
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish291

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

66Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

56Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
1.5/2.5CI-Tests — 4 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
4/5SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

52Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

53Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/383 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes32,796
source_files_sampled383
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

240GitHub stars
5contributors
16commits, last 12 months
215days since last push
16releases
1bus factor
8open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-18 21:17 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
6CI-Tests4 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
8SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 55

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 55 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetArdalis.SmartEnum8.0.0indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.14.0indirect
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.0indirect
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.2indirect
NuGetDapper2.0.143indirect
NuGetDapper2.1.35indirect
NuGetFluentAssertions6.12.0indirect
NuGetGitHubActionsTestLogger2.3.3indirect
NuGetGitHubActionsTestLogger2.4.1indirect
NuGetIntellenum—indirect
NuGetIntellenum1.0.1indirect
NuGetIntellenum1.0.4indirect
NuGetIntellenum3.0.6indirect
NuGetIntellenum999.9.10219943indirect
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2024.2.0indirect
NuGetlinq2db3.7.0indirect
NuGetlinq2db4.4.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.OpenApi8.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.OpenApi9.0.0-preview.4.24267.6indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzer.Testing1.1.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers3.3.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Analyzer.Testing.MSTest1.1.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeFix.Testing.MSTest1.1.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeRefactoring.Testing.MSTest1.1.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.Common—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore8.0.6indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Sqlite8.0.6indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.8.0indirect
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter3.1.1indirect
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework3.1.1indirect
NuGetNetEscapades.EnumGenerators1.0.0-beta07indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3indirect
NuGetNuGet.Common6.11.0indirect
NuGetNuGet.Packaging6.11.0indirect
NuGetNuGet.Protocol6.11.0indirect
NuGetRefit7.2.22indirect
NuGetScalar.AspNetCore1.1.1indirect
NuGetServiceStack.Text8.2.2indirect
NuGetSwashbuckle.AspNetCore6.4.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Formats.Asn18.0.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Net.Http4.3.4indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Json8.0.3indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Json8.0.5indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Json8.0.6indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.RegularExpressions4.3.1indirect
NuGetVerify.SourceGenerators2.2.0indirect
NuGetVerify.Xunit22.5.0indirect
NuGetxunit2.6.2indirect
NuGetxunit2.6.5indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.5.4indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.5.6indirect
NuGetXunit.SkippableFact1.4.13indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with SteveDunn/Intellenum. Read them side by side →

80soenneker/soenneker.enums.servicebusqueueAn abstract enum type for using in Azure Service Bus messagesExcellent78soenneker/soenneker.quark.enums.columnalignmentsAn enumeration for Quark, representing flexbox column alignment valuesGood78soenneker/soenneker.quark.enums.textwrapsAn HTML CSS keyword set in .NET enumeration formGood78soenneker/soenneker.quark.enums.sizeAn enumeration for Quark, representing common element sizesGood77soenneker/soenneker.stripe.enums.errortypesA strongly-typed list of Stripe error types, representing broad categories of failure returned by the Stripe API.Good77soenneker/soenneker.stripe.enums.errorcodesA strongly-typed list of known Stripe error codes returned in API responses, used for handling and categorizing Stripe errors programmatically.Good

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.