Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 11:25 UTC

StockSharp / Ecng

System framework with utility projects. Used by StockSharp platform

C#Custom license★ 16 stars⑂ 11 forkssince Apr 2024View on GitHub ↗

StockSharp/Ecng holds a health index of 27 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (70/100) and lowest on Security (20/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

27
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

27
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

StockSharpOrganization
298 followers16 public repossince Dec 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetEcng.GeneticSharp1.0.5-619 days agoecnggeneticsharprestwebsocketsjsonserialization

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

59Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
33.9/36Commit cadence49/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume1,113 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,113
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year49
How it's scored
0/27Ships releasesno releases published
0/36Release recencyno releases
0/27Release cadenceno releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

39Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
19.1/60Stars16 stars
8.3/25Forks11 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks11
stars16
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges81
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
40/80Total downloads7,049 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesEcng.GeneticSharp
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads7,049
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 89% of commits
10.8/13.5Contributor breadth8 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled8
top_contributor_share0.892
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
26.9/30PR acceptance26/29 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs26
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
17.8/25Owner reach298 followers of StockSharp
21/25Track record16 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers298
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginStockSharp
public_repos16
account_age_days4,275
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 19 days ago
20/20Version history6 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesEcng.GeneticSharp
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish19

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://stocksharp.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics9 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsaws, fsharp, ironpython, json, newtonsoft, restsharp, roslyn, smartformat, yandex
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://stocksharp.com
docs_sitehttps://stocksharp.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

20At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier50
security_posture_after_multiplier20
security_posture_before_jurisdiction40
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
39.5/40Legible commit history74 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.74
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapAnalyzers/Analyzers.csproj, Backup.AWS/Backup.AWS.csproj, Backup.All/Backup.All.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsAnalyzers/Analyzers.csproj, Backup.AWS/Backup.AWS.csproj, Backup.All/Backup.All.csproj, Backup.Azure/Backup.Azure.csproj, Backup.Mega/Backup.Mega.csproj, Backup.Yandex/Backup.Yandex.csproj, Backup/Backup.csproj, Collections/Collections.csproj, Common/Common.csproj, Compilation.All/Compilation.All.csproj, Compilation.FSharp/Compilation.FSharp.csproj, Compilation.Python/Compilation.Python.csproj, Compilation.Roslyn/Compilation.Roslyn.csproj, Compilation/Compilation.csproj, ComponentModel.Generator/ComponentModel.Generator.csproj, ComponentModel/ComponentModel.csproj, Configuration/Configuration.csproj, Data.Ado/Data.Ado.csproj, Data.Entities.Generator/Data.Entities.Generator.csproj, Data.ORM/Data.ORM.csproj, Data.PostgreSql/Data.PostgreSql.csproj, Data.SQLite/Data.SQLite.csproj, Data.SqlServer/Data.SqlServer.csproj, Data/Data.csproj, Drawing/Drawing.csproj, Excel.DX/Excel.DX.csproj, Excel.OpenXml/Excel.OpenXml.csproj, Excel/Excel.csproj, GeneticSharp/GeneticSharp.csproj, IO.Compression/IO.Compression.csproj, IO/IO.csproj, Interop.Windows/Interop.Windows.csproj, Interop/Interop.csproj, Licensing/Licensing.csproj, Linq/Linq.csproj, Localization/Localization.csproj, Logging/Logging.csproj, Markdown/Markdown.csproj, Net.Clients/Net.Clients.csproj, Net.SocketIO/Net.SocketIO.csproj, Net.Udp/Net.Udp.csproj, Net/Net.csproj, Nuget/Nuget.csproj, Reflection/Reflection.csproj, Security/Security.csproj, Serialization/Serialization.csproj, Server.Utils/Server.Utils.csproj, StringSearch/StringSearch.csproj, Tests/Tests.csproj, UnitTesting/UnitTesting.csproj, YandexDisk.Client/YandexDisk.Client.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.3/55Manageable file sizes12/951 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes172,293
source_files_sampled951
oversized_source_files12

Key facts

16GitHub stars
8contributors
1,113commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 11 ⇿
0Stars
11Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0246810121112024-092025-082026-07

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 11:24 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 32
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp$(MsCodeAnalysisVer)Analyzers/Analyzers.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers$(MsCodeAnalysisAnalyzersVer)Analyzers/Analyzers.csproj
NuGetAWSSDK.S3$(AWSSDKVer)Backup.AWS/Backup.AWS.csproj
NuGetAWSSDK.SQS$(AWSSDKVer)Backup.AWS/Backup.AWS.csproj
NuGetAWSSDK.SimpleNotificationService$(AWSSDKVer)Backup.AWS/Backup.AWS.csproj
NuGetAWSSDK.Glacier$(AWSSDKVer)Backup.AWS/Backup.AWS.csproj
NuGetAzure.Storage.Blobs$(AzureStorageBlobsVer)Backup.Azure/Backup.Azure.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding.CodePages$(MsExtensionsVer)Common/Common.csproj
NuGetNito.AsyncEx$(NitoVer)Common/Common.csproj
NuGetSmartFormat$(SmartFormatVer)Common/Common.csproj
NuGetFSharp.Compiler.Service$(FSharpVer)Compilation.FSharp/Compilation.FSharp.csproj
NuGetIronPython$(IronPythonVer)Compilation.Python/Compilation.Python.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp$(MsCodeAnalysisVer)Compilation.Roslyn/Compilation.Roslyn.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic$(MsCodeAnalysisVer)Compilation.Roslyn/Compilation.Roslyn.csproj
NuGetSystem.Configuration.ConfigurationManager$(MsExtensionsVer)Configuration/Configuration.csproj
NuGetEcng.DXRefs$(EcngVer)Excel.DX/Excel.DX.csproj
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common$(MsExtensionsVer)Excel.DX/Excel.DX.csproj
NuGetDocumentFormat.OpenXml$(OpenXmlVer)Excel.OpenXml/Excel.OpenXml.csproj
NuGetSharpCompress$(SharpCompressVer)IO.Compression/IO.Compression.csproj
NuGetSpecshell.NDde$(NDdeVer)Interop.Windows/Interop.Windows.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json$(NewtonJsonVer)Interop/Interop.csproj
NuGetWmiLight$(WmiLightVer)Interop/Interop.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Windows.CsWin32$(CsWin32Ver)Interop/Interop.csproj
NuGetMarkdig$(MarkdigVer)Markdown/Markdown.csproj
NuGetRestSharp$(RestSharpVer)Net.SocketIO/Net.SocketIO.csproj
NuGetNuGet.Protocol$(NuGetApiVer)Nuget/Nuget.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json$(NewtonJsonVer)Serialization/Serialization.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions$(MsExtensionsVer)Server.Utils/Server.Utils.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework$(MsTestVer)UnitTesting/UnitTesting.csproj
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2024.*YandexDisk.Client/YandexDisk.Client.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.WebApi.Client$(MicrosoftAspNetWebApiClientVer)YandexDisk.Client/YandexDisk.Client.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json$(NewtonJsonVer)YandexDisk.Client/YandexDisk.Client.csproj
All dependencies 35

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 29 direct and 6 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAWSSDK.Glacierdirect
NuGetAWSSDK.S3direct
NuGetAWSSDK.SimpleNotificationServicedirect
NuGetAWSSDK.SQSdirect
NuGetAzure.Storage.Blobsdirect
NuGetDocumentFormat.OpenXmldirect
NuGetEcng.DXRefsdirect
NuGetFSharp.Compiler.Servicedirect
NuGetIronPythondirect
NuGetJetBrains.Annotationsdirect
NuGetMarkdigdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.WebApi.Clientdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzersdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharpdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasicdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractionsdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Windows.CsWin32direct
NuGetMSTest.TestFrameworkdirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Jsondirect
NuGetNito.AsyncExdirect
NuGetNuGet.Protocoldirect
NuGetRestSharpdirect
NuGetSharpCompressdirect
NuGetSmartFormatdirect
NuGetSpecshell.NDdedirect
NuGetSystem.Configuration.ConfigurationManagerdirect
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Commondirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding.CodePagesdirect
NuGetWmiLightdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClientindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqliteindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdkindirect
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapterindirect
NuGetNpgsqlindirect
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharpindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.