Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 17:34 UTC

SubtitleEdit / subtitleedit

the subtitle editor :)

C#MIT★ 14,251 stars⑂ 1,310 forkssince Feb 2014View on GitHub ↗
KindDesktop applicationhow this is determined

SubtitleEdit/subtitleedit holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Security (54/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SubtitleEditOrganization
772 followers6 public repossince Dec 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetlibse5.1.0-1452 days agosubtitlesubtitlessubripsrtassawebvttvttebustlblu-raysupconvert

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume8,406 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year8,406
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~1.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv5.3.0-beta6
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases1.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

75Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars14,251 stars
25/25Forks1,310 forks
12.3/15Watchers167 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,310
stars14,251
watchers167
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
60.1/80Total downloads609,365 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageslibse
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads609,365
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 76% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 22 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.757
How it's scored
40.7/42Issue resolution97% of issues closed
24.9/30PR acceptance5,776/6,966 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs5,776
open_issues229
closed_issues6,946
prs_merged_7d53
prs_decided_7d60
prs_merged_30d53
prs_decided_30d60
issue_closed_ratio0.968
closed_unmerged_prs1,190
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
20.8/25Owner reach772 followers of SubtitleEdit
18.2/25Track record6 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers772
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginSubtitleEdit
public_repos6
account_age_days5,031

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 52 days ago
20/20Version history14 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageslibse
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish52

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

73Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttp://www.nikse.dk/SubtitleEdit/Help
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepagehttp://www.nikse.dk/SubtitleEdit/Help
docs_sitehttp://www.nikse.dk/SubtitleEdit/Help
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 22 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4.3

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages32
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 32 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

79Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history83 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.83
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes357
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/libse/LibSE.csproj, src/libuilogic/LibUiLogic.csproj, src/seconv/SeConv.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice53 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackages.lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.53
toolchain_manifestssrc/libse/LibSE.csproj, src/libuilogic/LibUiLogic.csproj, src/seconv/SeConv.csproj, src/ui/UI.csproj, tests/UI/UITests.csproj, tests/benchmarks/UiBenchmarks.csproj, tests/libse/LibSETests.csproj, tests/libuilogic/LibUiLogicTests.csproj, tests/seconv/SeConvTests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes55/3,611 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes1,333,360
source_files_sampled3,611
oversized_source_files55

Key facts

14,251GitHub stars
99contributors
8,406commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
229open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,310 ⇿
0Stars
1,310Forks
97Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

2004006008001,0001,2001,4001,310152019-092023-032026-09
Major 1Minor 2Patch 1

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 17:33 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 22 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 29
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetSkiaSharp3.119.4src/libse/LibSE.csproj
NuGetUTF.Unknown2.7.0src/libse/LibSE.csproj
NuGetCommunityToolkit.Mvvm8.4.2src/libuilogic/LibUiLogic.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp.HarfBuzz3.119.4src/libuilogic/LibUiLogic.csproj
NuGetWeCantSpell.Hunspell7.0.1src/libuilogic/LibUiLogic.csproj
NuGetSpectre.Console0.57.2src/seconv/SeConv.csproj
NuGetSpectre.Console.Cli0.55.0src/seconv/SeConv.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.Linux3.119.4src/seconv/SeConv.csproj
NuGetHarfBuzzSharp.NativeAssets.Linux8.3.1.5src/seconv/SeConv.csproj
NuGetAvalonia12.1.2src/ui/UI.csproj
NuGetAvalonia.Desktop12.1.2src/ui/UI.csproj
NuGetAvalonia.Markup.Declarative12.1.1src/ui/UI.csproj
NuGetAvalonia.Themes.Fluent12.1.2src/ui/UI.csproj
NuGetAvalonia.Fonts.Inter12.1.2src/ui/UI.csproj
NuGetAvaloniaUI.DiagnosticsSupport2.2.3src/ui/UI.csproj
NuGetCommunityToolkit.Mvvm8.4.2src/ui/UI.csproj
NuGetFFmpeg.AutoGen9.0.1.1src/ui/UI.csproj
NuGetGoogle.Cloud.TextToSpeech.V13.18.0src/ui/UI.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection11.0.0-preview.2.26159.112src/ui/UI.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions11.0.0-preview.2.26159.112src/ui/UI.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http11.0.0-preview.2.26159.112src/ui/UI.csproj
NuGetOptris.Icons.Avalonia12.0.7src/ui/UI.csproj
NuGetOptris.Icons.Avalonia.FontAwesome12.0.7src/ui/UI.csproj
NuGetOptris.Icons.Avalonia.MaterialDesign12.0.7src/ui/UI.csproj
NuGetSharpCompress0.50.4src/ui/UI.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.Linux3.119.4src/ui/UI.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp.HarfBuzz3.119.4src/ui/UI.csproj
NuGetHarfBuzzSharp.NativeAssets.Linux8.3.1.5src/ui/UI.csproj
NuGetTagLibSharp2.3.0src/ui/UI.csproj
All dependencies 32

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 25 direct and 7 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAvalonia12.1.2direct
NuGetAvalonia.Desktop12.1.2direct
NuGetAvalonia.Fonts.Inter12.1.2direct
NuGetAvalonia.Markup.Declarative12.1.1direct
NuGetAvalonia.Themes.Fluent12.1.2direct
NuGetAvaloniaUI.DiagnosticsSupport2.2.3direct
NuGetCommunityToolkit.Mvvm8.4.2direct
NuGetFFmpeg.AutoGen9.0.1.1direct
NuGetGoogle.Cloud.TextToSpeech.V13.18.0direct
NuGetHarfBuzzSharp.NativeAssets.Linux8.3.1.5direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection11.0.0-preview.2.26159.112direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions11.0.0-preview.2.26159.112direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http11.0.0-preview.2.26159.112direct
NuGetOptris.Icons.Avalonia12.0.7direct
NuGetOptris.Icons.Avalonia.FontAwesome12.0.7direct
NuGetOptris.Icons.Avalonia.MaterialDesign12.0.7direct
NuGetSharpCompress0.50.4direct
NuGetSkiaSharp3.119.4direct
NuGetSkiaSharp.HarfBuzz3.119.4direct
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.Linux3.119.4direct
NuGetSpectre.Console0.57.2direct
NuGetSpectre.Console.Cli0.55.0direct
NuGetTagLibSharp2.3.0direct
NuGetUTF.Unknown2.7.0direct
NuGetWeCantSpell.Hunspell7.0.1direct
NuGetAvalonia.Headless12.1.0indirect
NuGetAvalonia.Headless.XUnit12.1.2indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8indirect
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.9.0indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5indirect
NuGetxunit.v33.2.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 32 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.