Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 08:42 UTC

TIPS-SA / facturacionelectronicapy-setapi

Módulo NodeJS encargado de enviar el Documento electrónico a la SET

TypeScriptMIT★ 21 stars⑂ 20 forkssince Oct 2021View on GitHub ↗

TIPS-SA/facturacionelectronicapy-setapi holds a health index of 28 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (42/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (21/100). It was last updated 44 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 34 is calibrated to 28 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

TIPS-SAOrganization

53 followers9 public repossince May 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	facturacionelectronicapy-setapipoints to another repo — not scored	1.0.35	2,772	33	47 days ago	xml set

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

37Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

30At Risk

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 44 days ago
0.7/36	Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
7/18	Commit volume — 5 commits in the last year
4/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

commits_last_year	5
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	44
active_weeks_last_year	1

Release discipline

48Weak

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 33 version tags (no GitHub releases)
7.2/36	Release recency — latest release 394 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~105 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	33
latest_release_tag	v1.0.34
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	394
mean_days_between_releases	105

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

41Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

34At Risk

How it's scored

21.1/60	Stars — 21 stars
10.7/25	Forks — 20 forks
2.7/15	Watchers — 4 watchers

Inputs used

forks	20
stars	21
watchers	4
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

42Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

24At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.3/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 59% of commits
5.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	4
top_contributor_share	0.588

Issue & PR responsiveness

46Weak

How it's scored

30/42	Issue resolution — 71% of issues closed
10/30	PR acceptance — 2/6 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	2
open_issues	2
closed_issues	5
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.714
closed_unmerged_prs	4
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

58Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
12.5/25	Owner reach — 53 followers of TIPS-SA
16/25	Track record — 9 public repos, account ~4 yr old

Inputs used

followers	53
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	TIPS-SA
public_repos	9
account_age_days	1,593

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

21At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

1Critical

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

27At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

19Critical

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
3/7.5	Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 71 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	12
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	6
scorecard_aggregate	1.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

59Moderate

How it's scored

8.1/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 3 affected: axios 0.22.0 (high 8.6), node-forge 0.10.0 (high 8.6), xml2js 0.4.23 (moderate 5.3)
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
25.6/40	No advisories left outstanding — 3 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,714 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	37
affected_packages	3
assessed_packages	20
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 2, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages	3

Matched the npm:facturacionelectronicapy-setapi@1.0.35 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 20 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

29At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
1.1/40	Legible commit history — 2 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.021
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

23At Risk

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 97
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/6 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	30,734
source_files_sampled	6
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

21GitHub stars

4contributors

5commits, last 12 months

44days since last push

33releases

1bus factor

2open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
npm package 'facturacionelectronicapy-setapi' points at a different repository (https://github.com/marcosjara/facturacionelectronicapy-setapi); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 20 ⇿

0Stars

20Forks

24Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 0Patch 24

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.9 / 10

1.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 08:42 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0	Contributors	project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
4	Maintained	5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	71 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 5

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	axios	`^0.22.0`	package.json
npm	https	`^1.0.0`	package.json
npm	jszip	`^3.7.1`	package.json
npm	node-forge	`^0.10.0`	package.json
npm	xml2js	`^0.4.23`	package.json

All dependencies 169

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 164 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	axios	`0.22.0`	direct
npm	https	`1.0.0`	direct
npm	jszip	`3.7.1`	direct
npm	node-forge	`0.10.0`	direct
npm	xml2js	`0.4.23`	direct
npm	@babel/code-frame	`7.14.5`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.15.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/highlight	`7.14.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.scandir	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.stat	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.walk	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.9`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`16.10.3`	indirect
npm	@types/node-forge	`0.10.5`	indirect
npm	@types/xml2js	`0.4.9`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin	`4.33.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/experimental-utils	`4.33.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/scope-manager	`4.33.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/types	`4.33.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree	`4.33.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys	`4.33.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	argparse	`1.0.10`	indirect
npm	array-union	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	asynckit	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect
npm	braces	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	buffer-from	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	builtin-modules	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	call-bind	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	chalk	`2.4.2`	indirect
npm	cliui	`7.0.4`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`1.9.3`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	combined-stream	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	commander	`2.20.3`	indirect
npm	component-emitter	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	cookiejar	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	copyfiles	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	core-util-is	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.3.2`	indirect
npm	delayed-stream	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	diff	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	dir-glob	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	eslint-config-prettier	`8.3.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-mocha	`8.2.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-prettier	`3.4.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-utils	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-utils	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	esprima	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	fast-diff	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	fast-glob	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	fast-safe-stringify	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	fastq	`1.13.0`	indirect
npm	fill-range	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	follow-redirects	`1.14.4`	indirect
npm	form-data	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	formidable	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	functional-red-black-tree	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	globby	`11.0.4`	indirect
npm	has	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.1.8`	indirect
npm	immediate	`3.0.6`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.7.0`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-number	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	isarray	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	isarray	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`3.14.1`	indirect
npm	lie	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	merge2	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	methods	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	micromatch	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	mime	`2.5.2`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.50.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.33`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	mkdirp	`0.5.5`	indirect
npm	mkdirp	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	noms	`0.0.0`	indirect
npm	object-inspect	`1.11.0`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	pako	`1.0.11`	indirect
npm	path-is-absolute	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	path-type	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	prettier	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	prettier-linter-helpers	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	process-nextick-args	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	qs	`6.10.1`	indirect
npm	queue-microtask	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	ramda	`0.27.1`	indirect
npm	readable-stream	`1.0.34`	indirect
npm	readable-stream	`2.3.7`	indirect
npm	readable-stream	`3.6.0`	indirect
npm	regexpp	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	require-directory	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.20.0`	indirect
npm	reusify	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	run-parallel	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	sax	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	semver	`5.7.1`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.3.5`	indirect
npm	set-immediate-shim	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	slash	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-support	`0.5.20`	indirect
npm	sprintf-js	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	string_decoder	`0.10.31`	indirect
npm	string_decoder	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	string_decoder	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	superagent	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	supertest	`6.1.6`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`5.5.0`	indirect
npm	through2	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	to-regex-range	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	tslib	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	tslint	`6.1.3`	indirect
npm	tslint-config-prettier	`1.18.0`	indirect
npm	tsutils	`2.29.0`	indirect
npm	tsutils	`3.21.0`	indirect
npm	typescript	`3.9.10`	indirect
npm	untildify	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	util-deprecate	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	xmlbuilder	`11.0.1`	indirect
npm	xtend	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yallist	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	yargs	`16.2.0`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`20.2.9`	indirect

Dependency advisories 3

Installing npm:facturacionelectronicapy-setapi@1.0.35 pulls in 20 packages, direct and transitive: 3 carry known advisories, of which 3 are direct dependencies.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
axios	`0.22.0`	direct	high	23	`1.18.0`
node-forge	`0.10.0`	direct	high	13	`1.4.0`
xml2js	`0.4.23`	direct	moderate	1	`0.5.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records