Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 20:54 UTC

TheWidlarzGroup / react-native-video

A <Video /> component for react-native

Kotlin · Swift · TypeScriptMIT★ 7,713 stars⑂ 3,024 forkssince Mar 2015View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryMobile applicationhow this is determined

TheWidlarzGroup/react-native-video holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (96/100) and lowest on Security (54/100). It was last updated 13 days ago. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 81 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

TWGOrganization

112 followers51 public repossince Jan 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	@react-native-video/drm	7.0.0-beta.7	340	10	170 days ago	react-native react-native-video drm ios android
npm	react-native-video	6.19.2	2,212,644	176	121 days ago	—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

80Excellent

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 13 days ago
23.5/36	Commit cadence — 34/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 105 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 19 commit(s) and 24 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	105
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	13
active_weeks_last_year	34

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 90 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 15 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~21.2 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	90
latest_release_tag	v7.0.0-beta.11
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	15
mean_days_between_releases	21.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

96Exceptional · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

96Exceptional

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 7,713 stars
25/25	Forks — 3,024 forks
11.1/15	Watchers — 101 watchers

Inputs used

forks	3,024
stars	7,713
watchers	101
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 2,212,984 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	@react-native-video/drm, react-native-video
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	2,212,984
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

84Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

85Excellent

How it's scored

43.2/54	Bus factor — 4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 20% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 24 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	4
contributors_sampled	100
top_contributor_share	0.196

Issue & PR responsiveness

83Excellent

How it's scored

40.8/42	Issue resolution — 97% of issues closed
22.4/30	PR acceptance — 1,069/1,432 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 19/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

merged_prs	1,069
open_issues	96
closed_issues	3,265
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	6
prs_decided_30d	6
issue_closed_ratio	0.971
closed_unmerged_prs	363
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

69Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
14.8/25	Owner reach — 112 followers of TheWidlarzGroup
24.5/25	Track record — 51 public repos, account ~6 yr old

Inputs used

followers	112
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	TheWidlarzGroup
public_repos	51
account_age_days	2,404

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 121 days ago
20/20	Version history — 176 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	@react-native-video/drm, react-native-video
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	121

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .eslintrc.js
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
10/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 14 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

80Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.thewidlarzgroup.com/react-native-video/
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://docs.thewidlarzgroup.com/react-native-video/
docs_site	https://docs.thewidlarzgroup.com/react-native-video/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

43Weak

How it's scored

6.8/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
1.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 14 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5	Code-Review — Found 19/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 24 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 19 commit(s) and 24 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
1.5/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 3
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 112 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	4.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	8
affected_packages	4
assessed_packages	53
unassessed_packages	67
affected_by_severity	high 3, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 53 resolved dependencies against OSV. 67 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://nitro.margelo.com/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://nitro.margelo.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

57Moderate

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — example/android/app/build.gradle, example/android/build.gradle, packages/drm-plugin/android/build.gradle (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .eslintrc.js
11/11	Static type checking — config/tsconfig.json, docs/tsconfig.json, example/tsconfig.json, packages/drm-plugin/tsconfig.json, packages/react-native-video/tsconfig.json
0/10	Reproducible environment
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	—
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	config/tsconfig.json, docs/tsconfig.json, example/tsconfig.json, packages/drm-plugin/tsconfig.json, packages/react-native-video/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	example/android/app/build.gradle, example/android/build.gradle, packages/drm-plugin/android/build.gradle, packages/react-native-video/android/build.gradle
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Kotlin (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/219 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Kotlin
largest_source_bytes	21,518
source_files_sampled	219
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — example

Inputs used

example_dirs	example
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

7,713GitHub stars

100contributors

105commits, last 12 months

13days since last push

90releases

4bus factor

96open issues

npm, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3,024 ⇿

0Stars

3,024Forks

85Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Major 1Minor 20Patch 19

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10

4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 20:54 UTC

9	Binary-Artifacts	binaries present in source code
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
5	CI-Tests	14 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6	Code-Review	Found 19/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10	Contributors	project has 24 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	19 commit(s) and 24 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
3	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 3
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	112 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 1

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	@videojs/react	`^10.0.0-beta.11`	packages/react-native-video/package.json

All dependencies 120

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 119 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@videojs/react	`^10.0.0-beta.11`	direct
npm	@babel/core	`^7.25.2`	indirect
npm	@babel/preset-env	`^7.25.3`	indirect
npm	@babel/runtime	`^7.25.0`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/config-conventional	`^17.0.2`	indirect
npm	@docusaurus/core	`^3.8.1`	indirect
npm	@docusaurus/faster	`^3.8.1`	indirect
npm	@docusaurus/module-type-aliases	`^3.8.1`	indirect
npm	@docusaurus/preset-classic	`^3.8.1`	indirect
npm	@docusaurus/tsconfig	`^3.8.1`	indirect
npm	@docusaurus/types	`^3.8.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/js	`^9.10.0`	indirect
npm	@evilmartians/lefthook	`^1.5.0`	indirect
npm	@expo/config-plugins	`^10.0.2`	indirect
npm	@mdx-js/react	`^3.0.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/rest	`22.0.1`	indirect
npm	@react-native-community/cli	`15.0.1`	indirect
npm	@react-native-community/cli-platform-android	`15.0.1`	indirect
npm	@react-native-community/cli-platform-ios	`15.0.1`	indirect
npm	@react-native-community/slider	`^4.5.6`	indirect
npm	@react-native-video/drm	`*`	indirect
npm	@react-native/babel-preset	`0.79.2`	indirect
npm	@react-native/babel-preset	`^0.77.0`	indirect
npm	@react-native/eslint-config	`^0.77.0`	indirect
npm	@react-native/metro-config	`^0.77.0`	indirect
npm	@react-native/typescript-config	`^0.77.0`	indirect
npm	@release-it/bumper	`^7.0.6`	indirect
npm	@release-it/conventional-changelog	`^11.0.1`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/react-native	`^2.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/eslint__js	`^8.42.3`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`^24.9.1`	indirect
npm	@types/react	`^18.2.44`	indirect
npm	@types/react	`^18.3.0`	indirect
npm	@types/react-native-web	`^0.19.2`	indirect
npm	@widlarzgroup/docusaurus-ui	`^0.1.3`	indirect
npm	@widlarzgroup/eslint-plugin-docusaurus	`^0.0.1`	indirect
npm	babel-loader	`^9.2.1`	indirect
npm	babel-plugin-react-native-web	`^0.19.13`	indirect
npm	clsx	`^2.0.0`	indirect
npm	commitlint	`^17.0.2`	indirect
npm	conventional-changelog-conventionalcommits	`^9.3.1`	indirect
npm	css-loader	`^7.1.2`	indirect
npm	del-cli	`^5.1.0`	indirect
npm	docusaurus-lunr-search	`^3.6.0`	indirect
npm	docusaurus-plugin-llms	`^0.1.5`	indirect
npm	docusaurus-plugin-typedoc	`^1.4.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`^8.51.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-config-prettier	`9.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-config-prettier	`^9.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-prettier	`^5.0.1`	indirect
npm	html-webpack-plugin	`^5.6.3`	indirect
npm	motion	`^12.23.26`	indirect
npm	nitrogen	`0.35.0`	indirect
npm	patch-package	`^8.0.0`	indirect
npm	prettier	`^3.0.3`	indirect
npm	prism-react-renderer	`^2.3.0`	indirect
npm	react	`18.3.1`	indirect
npm	react	`^19.0.0`	indirect
npm	react-dom	`18.3.1`	indirect
npm	react-dom	`^19.0.0`	indirect
npm	react-native	`^0.77.0`	indirect
npm	react-native-builder-bob	`^0.40.0`	indirect
npm	react-native-builder-bob	`^0.40.13`	indirect
npm	react-native-nitro-modules	`0.35.0`	indirect
npm	react-native-video	`*`	indirect
npm	react-native-web	`^0.19.13`	indirect
npm	release-it	`^20.2.0`	indirect
npm	style-loader	`^4.0.0`	indirect
npm	typescript	`^5.2.2`	indirect
npm	typescript	`^5.8.3`	indirect
npm	typescript-eslint	`^8.13.0`	indirect
npm	url-loader	`^4.1.1`	indirect
npm	webpack	`^5.97.0`	indirect
npm	webpack-cli	`^6.0.0`	indirect
npm	webpack-dev-server	`^5.2.0`	indirect
NuGet	Microsoft.Windows.CppWinRT	`2.0.190730.2`	indirect
NuGet	Microsoft.Windows.CppWinRT	`2.0.200316.3`	indirect
RubyGems	activesupport	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	activesupport	`6.1.7.10`	indirect
RubyGems	addressable	`2.8.7`	indirect
RubyGems	algoliasearch	`1.27.5`	indirect
RubyGems	atomos	`0.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	base64	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	CFPropertyList	`3.0.7`	indirect
RubyGems	claide	`1.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	cocoapods	`1.15.2`	indirect
RubyGems	cocoapods-core	`1.15.2`	indirect
RubyGems	cocoapods-deintegrate	`1.0.5`	indirect
RubyGems	cocoapods-downloader	`2.1`	indirect
RubyGems	cocoapods-plugins	`1.0.0`	indirect
RubyGems	cocoapods-search	`1.0.1`	indirect
RubyGems	cocoapods-swift-modular-headers	`0.0.2`	indirect
RubyGems	cocoapods-trunk	`1.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	cocoapods-try	`1.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	colored2	`3.1.2`	indirect
RubyGems	concurrent-ruby	`1.3.3`	indirect
RubyGems	escape	`0.0.4`	indirect
RubyGems	ethon	`0.16.0`	indirect
RubyGems	ffi	`1.17.2`	indirect
RubyGems	fourflusher	`2.3.1`	indirect
RubyGems	fuzzy_match	`2.0.4`	indirect
RubyGems	gh_inspector	`1.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	httpclient	`2.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	i18n	`1.14.7`	indirect
RubyGems	json	`2.7.6`	indirect
RubyGems	minitest	`5.25.4`	indirect
RubyGems	molinillo	`0.8.0`	indirect
RubyGems	mutex_m	`0.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	nanaimo	`0.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	nap	`1.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	netrc	`0.11.0`	indirect
RubyGems	nkf	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	public_suffix	`4.0.7`	indirect
RubyGems	rexml	`3.4.1`	indirect
RubyGems	ruby-macho	`2.5.1`	indirect
RubyGems	typhoeus	`1.4.1`	indirect
RubyGems	tzinfo	`2.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	xcodeproj	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	xcodeproj	`1.25.1`	indirect
RubyGems	zeitwerk	`2.6.18`	indirect

Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 53 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 67 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
activesupport	`6.1.7.10`	indirect	high	3	`8.1.2.1`
addressable	`2.8.7`	indirect	high	1	`2.9.0`
concurrent-ruby	`1.3.3`	indirect	high	3	`1.3.7`
rexml	`3.4.1`	indirect	moderate	1	`3.4.2`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records