Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 16:26 UTC

TwiTech-LAB / devchain

Run a team of AI coding agents. On your machine. Local-first orchestration for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Antigravity, and Copilot.

TypeScriptCustom license★ 99 stars⑂ 13 forkssince Dec 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolNetwork serviceMCP serverLibraryWeb interfacehow this is determined

TwiTech-LAB/devchain holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (88/100) and lowest on Security (22/100). It was last updated 7 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

TwiTech LABOrganization
1 follower3 public repossince Mar 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmdevchain-cli0.23.11,462707 days agodevchainaiorchestration

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 7 days ago
17.3/36Commit cadence — 25/52 weeks with commits
16.2/18Commit volume — 62 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 26 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year62
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push7
active_weeks_last_year25

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 36 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 7 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~6.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count36
latest_release_tagv0.23.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release7
mean_days_between_releases6.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

53Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
32.3/60Stars — 99 stars
9/25Forks — 13 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks13
stars99
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonbelow_threshold
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
42.2/80Monthly downloads — 1,462 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdevchain-cli
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads1,462
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 92% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.919
How it's scored
36.4/42Issue resolution — 87% of issues closed
25.7/30PR acceptance — 6/7 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 3/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs6
open_issues2
closed_issues13
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio0.867
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d3
first_time_prs_decided_30d3
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of TwiTech-LAB
9.3/25Track record — 3 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginTwiTech-LAB
public_repos3
account_age_days895

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 7 days ago
20/20Version history — 70 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdevchain-cli
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish7

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://devchain.cc
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagent-orchestration, ai-agents, ai-coding, claude-code, code-review, developer-tools, local-first, mcp, opencode, tmux
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://devchain.cc
docs_sitehttps://devchain.cc
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

22At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 26 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 156 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate2.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
4.1/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 8 affected: @nestjs/platform-fastify 10.4.22 (critical 9.1), @fastify/http-proxy 9.5.0 (high 8.6), @modelcontextprotocol/sdk 1.20.1 (high 7.5), +5 more
2.7/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 9 affected: @fastify/middie 8.3.3 (critical 9.1), @fastify/reply-from 9.8.0 (high 8.6), fastify 4.28.1 (high 7.5), +6 more
9.8/40No advisories left outstanding — 16 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 302 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories80
affected_packages17
assessed_packages465
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 12, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages8
Matched the npm:devchain-cli@0.23.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 465 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
32.7/40Legible commit history — 38 of 62 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.613
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — apps/local-app/tsconfig.json, packages/shared/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 62
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsapps/local-app/tsconfig.json, packages/shared/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
53.9/55Manageable file sizes — 46/2,408 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes170,233
source_files_sampled2,408
oversized_source_files46
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

99GitHub stars
4contributors
62commits, last 12 months
7days since last push
36releases
1bus factor
2open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-07-20: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 99 stars today.
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 89 ★ / 13 ⇿
89Stars
13Forks
33Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-20. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

020406080100891362026-012026-042026-08
Major 0Minor 13Patch 20
OpenSSF Scorecard 2.3 / 10
2.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 16:26 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained26 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities156 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 83
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@fastify/http-proxy9.5.0package.json
npm@fastify/send2.1.0package.json
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk1.20.1package.json
npm@multiavatar/multiavatar1.0.7package.json
npm@nestjs/common^10.3.3package.json
npm@nestjs/core^10.3.3package.json
npm@nestjs/event-emitter3.0.1package.json
npm@nestjs/platform-fastify^10.3.3package.json
npm@nestjs/platform-socket.io^10.3.3package.json
npm@nestjs/swagger^7.3.0package.json
npm@nestjs/websockets^10.3.3package.json
npm@noble/ciphers^1.3.0package.json
npm@noble/curves^1.9.7package.json
npm@noble/hashes^1.8.0package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-alert-dialog1.1.15package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-avatar1.1.10package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-checkbox1.3.3package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-collapsible1.1.12package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-context-menu2.2.16package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-dialog1.1.15package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-dropdown-menu2.1.16package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-label2.1.7package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-popover1.1.15package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-scroll-area1.2.10package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-select2.2.6package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-separator1.1.7package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-slider1.3.6package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-slot1.2.3package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-switch1.2.6package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-tabs1.1.13package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-toast1.2.15package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-toggle-group1.1.11package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-tooltip1.2.8package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-visually-hidden1.2.4package.json
npm@tanstack/react-query5.90.2package.json
npm@tanstack/react-table8.21.3package.json
npm@tanstack/react-virtual3.13.18package.json
npm@xterm/addon-fit0.11.0package.json
npm@xterm/xterm6.0.0package.json
npmansi-to-html0.7.2package.json
npmbetter-sqlite313.0.2package.json
npmclass-transformer^0.5.1package.json
npmclass-validator^0.14.1package.json
npmclass-variance-authority0.7.1package.json
npmclsx2.1.1package.json
npmcommander^12.1.0package.json
npmcroner10.0.1package.json
npmdockerode5.0.1package.json
npmdompurify3.3.1package.json
npmdotenv^16.4.5package.json
npmdrizzle-orm0.44.6package.json
npmfastify^4.26.2package.json
npmget-port^5.1.1package.json
npmgray-matter4.0.3package.json
npmhandlebars^4.7.9package.json
npmhterm2.0.2package.json
npmhterm-umd1.0.1package.json
npmjose^5.10.0package.json
npmlucide-react0.545.0package.json
npmnode-pty1.2.0-beta.2package.json
npmopen^8.4.2package.json
npmpino^8.19.0package.json
npmpino-http^9.0.0package.json
npmpino-pretty^11.0.0package.json
npmproper-lockfile4.1.2package.json
npmqrcode.react4.2.0package.json
npmreact^18.2.0package.json
npmreact-diff-view3.3.2package.json
npmreact-dom^18.2.0package.json
npmreact-resizable-panels4.4.0package.json
npmreact-rnd10.5.2package.json
npmreact-router-dom7.9.4package.json
npmreflect-metadata^0.2.1package.json
npmrefractor5.0.0package.json
npmrxjs^7.8.1package.json
npmsemver^7.6.0package.json
npmsocket.io4.8.1package.json
npmsocket.io-client4.8.1package.json
npmswagger-ui-dist5.17.14package.json
npmtailwind-merge3.3.1package.json
npmtar^7.5.22package.json
npmws8.20.0package.json
npmzod^3.22.4package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 17

Installing npm:devchain-cli@0.23.1 pulls in 465 packages, direct and transitive: 17 carry known advisories, of which 8 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
@nestjs/platform-fastify10.4.22directcritical411.1.24
@fastify/middie8.3.3indirectcritical49.3.2
@fastify/http-proxy9.5.0directhigh112.6.2
@modelcontextprotocol/sdk1.20.1directhigh31.26.0
drizzle-orm0.44.6directhigh11.0.0-beta.20
fastify4.29.1directhigh45.12.1
ws8.20.0directhigh28.21.0
@fastify/reply-from9.8.0indirecthigh212.6.2
fastify4.28.1indirecthigh45.12.1
find-my-way8.2.2indirecthigh19.7.0
js-yaml4.1.0indirecthigh54.3.2
lodash4.17.21indirecthigh34.18.0
react-router7.9.4indirecthigh137.18.0
undici5.29.0indirecthigh128.9.0
@nestjs/core10.4.22directmoderate111.1.18
dompurify3.3.1directmoderate183.4.13
file-type20.4.1indirectmoderate221.3.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.