Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 21:40 UTC

Tyrrrz / YoutubeExplode

Abstraction layer over YouTube's internal API

C#MIT★ 3,693 stars⑂ 587 forkssince Aug 2016View on GitHub ↗

Tyrrrz/YoutubeExplode holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (78/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (26/100). It was last updated 9 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Oleksii HolubPersonal account
2,901 followers40 public repossince Jul 2012

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 9 days ago
18.7/36Commit cadence27/52 weeks with commits
16.9/18Commit volume76 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained17 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year76
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push9
active_weeks_last_year27
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases22 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 87 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~58.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count22
latest_release_tag6.6
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release87
mean_days_between_releases58.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

76Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
57.9/60Stars3,693 stars
23.1/25Forks587 forks
11.1/15Watchers99 watchers
Inputs used
forks587
stars3,693
watchers99
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 90% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth55 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled55
top_contributor_share0.902
How it's scored
41.7/42Issue resolution99% of issues closed
23.8/30PR acceptance126/159 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs126
open_issues5
closed_issues632
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.992
closed_unmerged_prs33
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
24.9/25Owner reach2,901 followers of Tyrrrz
23.7/25Track record40 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,901
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginTyrrrz
public_repos40
account_age_days5,124
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

50Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests7 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://nuget.org/packages/YoutubeExplode
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsyoutube, download, reverse-engineering, dotnet, dotnet-core, dotnet-standard, downloader, parser
has_wikino
homepagehttps://nuget.org/packages/YoutubeExplode
docs_sitehttps://nuget.org/packages/YoutubeExplode
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

53Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests7 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained17 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

26At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/128 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes13,663
source_files_sampled128
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

3,693GitHub stars
55contributors
76commits, last 12 months
9days since last push
22releases
1bus factor
5open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
5.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-18 21:40 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8CI-Tests7 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained17 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 45
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetcoverlet.collectorYoutubeExplode.Converter.Tests/YoutubeExplode.Converter.Tests.csproj
NuGetCSharpier.MsBuildYoutubeExplode.Converter.Tests/YoutubeExplode.Converter.Tests.csproj
NuGetFluentAssertionsYoutubeExplode.Converter.Tests/YoutubeExplode.Converter.Tests.csproj
NuGetGitHubActionsTestLoggerYoutubeExplode.Converter.Tests/YoutubeExplode.Converter.Tests.csproj
NuGetGressYoutubeExplode.Converter.Tests/YoutubeExplode.Converter.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.SdkYoutubeExplode.Converter.Tests/YoutubeExplode.Converter.Tests.csproj
NuGetPowerKitYoutubeExplode.Converter.Tests/YoutubeExplode.Converter.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunitYoutubeExplode.Converter.Tests/YoutubeExplode.Converter.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudioYoutubeExplode.Converter.Tests/YoutubeExplode.Converter.Tests.csproj
NuGetBinternalYoutubeExplode.Converter/YoutubeExplode.Converter.csproj
NuGetCliWrapYoutubeExplode.Converter/YoutubeExplode.Converter.csproj
NuGetCSharpier.MsBuildYoutubeExplode.Converter/YoutubeExplode.Converter.csproj
NuGetPolyShimYoutubeExplode.Converter/YoutubeExplode.Converter.csproj
NuGetPowerKitYoutubeExplode.Converter/YoutubeExplode.Converter.csproj
NuGetSnekYoutubeExplode.Converter/YoutubeExplode.Converter.csproj
NuGetCSharpier.MsBuildYoutubeExplode.Demo.Cli/YoutubeExplode.Demo.Cli.csproj
NuGetAsyncImageLoader.AvaloniaYoutubeExplode.Demo.Gui/YoutubeExplode.Demo.Gui.csproj
NuGetAvaloniaYoutubeExplode.Demo.Gui/YoutubeExplode.Demo.Gui.csproj
NuGetAvalonia.DesktopYoutubeExplode.Demo.Gui/YoutubeExplode.Demo.Gui.csproj
NuGetCommunityToolkit.MvvmYoutubeExplode.Demo.Gui/YoutubeExplode.Demo.Gui.csproj
NuGetCSharpier.MsBuildYoutubeExplode.Demo.Gui/YoutubeExplode.Demo.Gui.csproj
NuGetPowerKitYoutubeExplode.Demo.Gui/YoutubeExplode.Demo.Gui.csproj
NuGetMaterial.AvaloniaYoutubeExplode.Demo.Gui/YoutubeExplode.Demo.Gui.csproj
NuGetMaterial.Icons.AvaloniaYoutubeExplode.Demo.Gui/YoutubeExplode.Demo.Gui.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collectorYoutubeExplode.Tests/YoutubeExplode.Tests.csproj
NuGetCSharpier.MsBuildYoutubeExplode.Tests/YoutubeExplode.Tests.csproj
NuGetFluentAssertionsYoutubeExplode.Tests/YoutubeExplode.Tests.csproj
NuGetGitHubActionsTestLoggerYoutubeExplode.Tests/YoutubeExplode.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.SdkYoutubeExplode.Tests/YoutubeExplode.Tests.csproj
NuGetPolyShimYoutubeExplode.Tests/YoutubeExplode.Tests.csproj
NuGetPowerKitYoutubeExplode.Tests/YoutubeExplode.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunitYoutubeExplode.Tests/YoutubeExplode.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudioYoutubeExplode.Tests/YoutubeExplode.Tests.csproj
NuGetAngleSharpYoutubeExplode/YoutubeExplode.csproj
NuGetBinternalYoutubeExplode/YoutubeExplode.csproj
NuGetCSharpier.MsBuildYoutubeExplode/YoutubeExplode.csproj
NuGetDeorcifyYoutubeExplode/YoutubeExplode.csproj
NuGetJsonExtensionsYoutubeExplode/YoutubeExplode.csproj
NuGetLazy.FodyYoutubeExplode/YoutubeExplode.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfacesYoutubeExplode/YoutubeExplode.csproj
NuGetPolyShimYoutubeExplode/YoutubeExplode.csproj
NuGetPowerKitYoutubeExplode/YoutubeExplode.csproj
NuGetSnekYoutubeExplode/YoutubeExplode.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.JsonYoutubeExplode/YoutubeExplode.csproj
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.ExtensionsYoutubeExplode/YoutubeExplode.csproj
All dependencies 26

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 26 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAngleSharpdirect
NuGetAsyncImageLoader.Avaloniadirect
NuGetAvaloniadirect
NuGetAvalonia.Desktopdirect
NuGetBinternaldirect
NuGetCliWrapdirect
NuGetCommunityToolkit.Mvvmdirect
NuGetcoverlet.collectordirect
NuGetCSharpier.MsBuilddirect
NuGetDeorcifydirect
NuGetFluentAssertionsdirect
NuGetGitHubActionsTestLoggerdirect
NuGetGressdirect
NuGetJsonExtensionsdirect
NuGetLazy.Fodydirect
NuGetMaterial.Avaloniadirect
NuGetMaterial.Icons.Avaloniadirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfacesdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdkdirect
NuGetPolyShimdirect
NuGetPowerKitdirect
NuGetSnekdirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Jsondirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensionsdirect
NuGetxunitdirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudiodirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.