Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 04:38 UTC

Tzamun-Arabia-IT-Co / auxly-memory-cli

A local-first, file-based memory CLI for AI tools. Own your context in plain Markdown — auditable, versionable, and provider-agnostic.

GoMIT★ 2 stars⑂ 1 forksince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryMCP serverTerminal interfacehow this is determined

Tzamun-Arabia-IT-Co/auxly-memory-cli holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (81/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (41/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Tzamun Arabia IT CoOrganization · verified domain
4 followers6 public repossince Jul 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Gogithub.com/Tzamun-Arabia-IT-Co/auxly-memory-cliv1.4.6-4624 days ago—
npmauxly-cli1.4.63182624 days agoauxlyaimemorymcpcliagents
PyPIauxly-cli1.4.61562624 days agoauxlyaimemorymcpcliagents

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 230 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year230
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year9

Release discipline

98Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 41 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 24 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~5.1 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count41
latest_release_tagv1.4.6
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release24
mean_days_between_releases5.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

41Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 2 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars2
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
35.7/80Monthly downloads — 474 downloads/month across go, npm, pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/Tzamun-Arabia-IT-Co/auxly-memory-cli, auxly-cli, auxly-cli
dependents—
ecosystemsgo, npm, pypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads474
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance — 2/2 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs2
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
5/25Owner reach — 4 followers of Tzamun-Arabia-IT-Co
8.5/25Track record — 6 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers4
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginTzamun-Arabia-IT-Co
public_repos6
account_age_days436

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on go, npm, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 24 days ago
20/20Version history — 46 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/Tzamun-Arabia-IT-Co/auxly-memory-cli, auxly-cli, auxly-cli
ecosystemsgo, npm, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish24

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://auxly.io/unified-memory
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 15 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-agents, cli, cli-tool, mcp, mcp-server, developer-tools, llm-tools, local-first, open-source, privacy, codex, codex-cli, antigravity, claude, golang
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://auxly.io/unified-memory
docs_sitehttps://auxly.io/unified-memory
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
26.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: golang.org/x/crypto v0.52.0 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories5
affected_packages2
assessed_packages40
unassessed_packages2
affected_by_severityunknown 2
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 40 resolved dependencies against OSV. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — templates/CLAUDE.md, templates/GEMINI.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filestemplates/CLAUDE.md, templates/GEMINI.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes5,971
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
53.8/55Manageable file sizes — 7/319 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes103,657
source_files_sampled319
oversized_source_files7
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2GitHub stars
1contributors
230commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
41releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Go, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 04:37 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 17
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gofilippo.io/agev1.3.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubblesv0.21.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubbleteav1.3.10go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/lipglossv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/creack/ptyv1.1.24go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/jedisct1/go-minisignv0.0.0-20260527172527-a09352b57a22go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.16go.mod
Gogithub.com/muesli/reflowv0.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/muesli/termenvv0.16.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.45.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.43.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.51.0go.mod
PyPIcryptography>=3.4pip/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 42

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 17 direct and 25 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gofilippo.io/agev1.3.1direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubblesv0.21.0direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubbleteav1.3.10direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/lipglossv1.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/creack/ptyv1.1.24direct
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/jedisct1/go-minisignv0.0.0-20260527172527-a09352b57a22direct
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.16direct
Gogithub.com/muesli/reflowv0.3.0direct
Gogithub.com/muesli/termenvv0.16.0direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2direct
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.45.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.43.0direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1direct
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.51.0direct
PyPIcryptography—direct
Gofilippo.io/hpkev0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/atotto/clipboardv0.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/aymanbagabas/go-osc52/v2v2.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/colorprofilev0.2.3-0.20250311203215-f60798e515dcindirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/ansiv0.10.1indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/cellbufv0.0.13-0.20250311204145-2c3ea96c31ddindirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/termv0.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/erikgeiser/coninputv0.0.0-20211004153227-1c3628e74d0findirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorfulv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-localereaderv0.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/ansiv0.0.0-20230316100256-276c6243b2f6indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/cancelreaderv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/ncruces/go-strftimev1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/remyoudompheng/bigfftv0.0.0-20230129092748-24d4a6f8daecindirect
Gogithub.com/rivo/unisegv0.4.7indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.9indirect
Gogithub.com/xo/terminfov0.0.0-20220910002029-abceb7e1c41eindirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.37.0indirect
Gomodernc.org/libcv1.72.3indirect
Gomodernc.org/mathutilv1.7.1indirect
Gomodernc.org/memoryv1.11.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools—indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 40 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0directunknown40.56.0
golang.org/x/textv0.37.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go, npm, PyPI.