Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 00:17 UTC

WildGums / Orc.SupportPackage

C#Custom license★ 4 stars⑂ 1 forksince Jan 2015View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryDesktop applicationhow this is determined

WildGums/Orc.SupportPackage holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (87/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (30/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

WildGumsOrganization · verified domain
44 followers64 public repossince Jan 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetOrc.SupportPackage6.0.0-2159 days agoorcsupportpackage
NuGetOrc.SupportPackage.Xaml6.0.0-2159 days agoorcsupportpackagexamlwpf

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
33.2/36Commit cadence — 48/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 404 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year404
human_commit_share0.73
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year48
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 22 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 59 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~269.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count22
latest_release_tag6.0.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release59
mean_days_between_releases269.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
5.3/15Watchers — 10 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars4
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
55.1/80Total downloads — 200,952 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesOrc.SupportPackage, Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads200,952
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 93% of commits
12.2/13.5Contributor breadth — 9 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled9
top_contributor_share0.932
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
28.2/30PR acceptance — 1,065/1,133 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1,065
open_issues0
closed_issues5
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d7
prs_decided_30d7
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs68
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
11.9/25Owner reach — 44 followers of WildGums
25/25Track record — 64 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers44
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginWildGums
public_repos64
account_age_days4,297

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 59 days ago
20/20Version history — 21 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesOrc.SupportPackage, Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish59

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

30At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

30At Risk
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages16
unassessed_packages3
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 16 resolved dependencies against OSV. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

71Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
35.8/40Legible commit history — 49 of 73 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.671
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,913
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/Orc.SupportPackage.Example/Orc.SupportPackage.Example.csproj, src/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests.csproj, src/Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml/Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 25 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackages.lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/Orc.SupportPackage.Example/Orc.SupportPackage.Example.csproj, src/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests.csproj, src/Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml/Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml.csproj, src/Orc.SupportPackage/Orc.SupportPackage.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.25
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/49 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes9,025
source_files_sampled49
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

4GitHub stars
9contributors
404commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
22releases
1bus factor
0open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch nuget package 'Orc.SupportPackage.Tests' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10
6.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 00:16 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 33
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetCatel.Fody7.1.0src/Orc.SupportPackage.Example/Orc.SupportPackage.Example.csproj
NuGetCatel.SourceGenerators7.1.0src/Orc.SupportPackage.Example/Orc.SupportPackage.Example.csproj
NuGetFody6.9.3src/Orc.SupportPackage.Example/Orc.SupportPackage.Example.csproj
NuGetLoadAssembliesOnStartup.Fody4.7.0src/Orc.SupportPackage.Example/Orc.SupportPackage.Example.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting10.0.*src/Orc.SupportPackage.Example/Orc.SupportPackage.Example.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug10.0.*src/Orc.SupportPackage.Example/Orc.SupportPackage.Example.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Console10.0.*src/Orc.SupportPackage.Example/Orc.SupportPackage.Example.csproj
NuGetOrc.LogViewer6.0.0src/Orc.SupportPackage.Example/Orc.SupportPackage.Example.csproj
NuGetOrchestra.Core8.1.2src/Orc.SupportPackage.Example/Orc.SupportPackage.Example.csproj
NuGetCatel.Fody7.1.0src/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests.csproj
NuGetFody6.9.3src/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Console10.0.*src/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug10.0.*src/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.11.0src/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit5.0.0src/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter6.3.1src/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests.csproj
NuGetPublicApiGenerator11.5.4src/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests.csproj
NuGetVerify.NUnit33.3.4src/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests/Orc.SupportPackage.Tests.csproj
NuGetCatel.Fody7.1.0src/Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml/Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml.csproj
NuGetCatel.MVVM7.0.1src/Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml/Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml.csproj
NuGetCatel.SourceGenerators7.1.0src/Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml/Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml.csproj
NuGetFody6.9.3src/Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml/Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml.csproj
NuGetLoadAssembliesOnStartup.Fody4.7.0src/Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml/Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml.csproj
NuGetMethodTimer.Fody3.2.3src/Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml/Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml.csproj
NuGetObsolete.Fody5.3.1src/Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml/Orc.SupportPackage.Xaml.csproj
NuGetCatel.Fody7.1.0src/Orc.SupportPackage/Orc.SupportPackage.csproj
NuGetCatel.SourceGenerators7.1.0src/Orc.SupportPackage/Orc.SupportPackage.csproj
NuGetFody6.9.3src/Orc.SupportPackage/Orc.SupportPackage.csproj
NuGetLoadAssembliesOnStartup.Fody4.7.0src/Orc.SupportPackage/Orc.SupportPackage.csproj
NuGetMethodTimer.Fody3.2.3src/Orc.SupportPackage/Orc.SupportPackage.csproj
NuGetObsolete.Fody5.3.1src/Orc.SupportPackage/Orc.SupportPackage.csproj
NuGetOrc.FileSystem6.0.0src/Orc.SupportPackage/Orc.SupportPackage.csproj
NuGetOrc.SystemInfo6.0.0src/Orc.SupportPackage/Orc.SupportPackage.csproj
All dependencies 19

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 19 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetCatel.Fody7.1.0direct
NuGetCatel.MVVM7.0.1direct
NuGetCatel.SourceGenerators7.1.0direct
NuGetFody6.9.3direct
NuGetLoadAssembliesOnStartup.Fody4.7.0direct
NuGetMethodTimer.Fody3.2.3direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Console—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.11.0direct
NuGetNUnit5.0.0direct
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter6.3.1direct
NuGetObsolete.Fody5.3.1direct
NuGetOrc.FileSystem6.0.0direct
NuGetOrc.LogViewer6.0.0direct
NuGetOrc.SystemInfo6.0.0direct
NuGetOrchestra.Core8.1.2direct
NuGetPublicApiGenerator11.5.4direct
NuGetVerify.NUnit33.3.4direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 16 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.