Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-10 13:38 UTC

WithAutonomi / self_encryption

Self-encrypting, content-addressed storage - convergent encryption that splits data into obfuscated chunks. The peer-reviewed core of Autonomi.

RustApache-2.0★ 139 stars⑂ 75 forkssince Feb 2015View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

WithAutonomi/self_encryption holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (91/100) and lowest on Security (55/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AutonomiOrganization
21 followers32 public repossince Mar 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIself_encryptionpoints to another repo — not scored0.35.035418211 days agoencryptionconvergent-encryptionself-encryptionobfuscationsecurity
crates.ioself_encryption0.36.16,985902 days agoautonomiconvergentdeduplicationencryptionstoragecryptographyfilesystem
crates.ioself-encryption-nodejs0.1.011430 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

73Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
13.8/18Commit volume — 33 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year33
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 52 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~99.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count52
latest_release_tagv0.36.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases99.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
34.7/60Stars — 139 stars
15.6/25Forks — 75 forks
7.1/15Watchers — 20 watchers
Inputs used
forks75
stars139
watchers20
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
51.3/80Monthly downloads — 6,985 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesself_encryption
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads906,495
monthly_downloads6,985
unverified_packages_excludedself-encryption-nodejs
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 36% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 41 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled41
top_contributor_share0.363
How it's scored
37/42Issue resolution — 88% of issues closed
26.4/30PR acceptance — 356/405 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs356
open_issues4
closed_issues30
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.882
closed_unmerged_prs49
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.7/25Owner reach — 21 followers of WithAutonomi
12.2/25Track record — 32 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers21
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginWithAutonomi
public_repos32
account_age_days202

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 90 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesself_encryption, self-encryption-nodejs
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — rustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.autonomi.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsautonomi, content-addressing, convergent-encryption, decentralized-storage, encryption, rust, self-encryption
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://docs.autonomi.com
docs_sitehttps://docs.autonomi.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-Review — Found 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 41 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages3
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:self_encryption@0.35.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 3 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

91Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.autonomi.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.autonomi.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,289
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, nodejs/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — rustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 5 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.05
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, nodejs/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/35 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes45,178
source_files_sampled35
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

139GitHub stars
41contributors
33commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
52releases
3bus factor
4open issues
crates.io, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • pypi package 'self_encryption' points at a different repository (https://github.com/maidsafe/self_encryption); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch npm package '@withautonomi/self-encryption' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 75 ⇿
0Stars
75Forks
50Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325385063757352015-032020-082026-01
Major 0Minor 13Patch 36

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-10 13:37 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 13 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities41 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 23
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioblake31Cargo.toml
crates.iobincode~1.3.3Cargo.toml
crates.iochacha20poly13050.10Cargo.toml
crates.iohex~0.4.3Cargo.toml
crates.iorand~0.8.5Cargo.toml
crates.iorand_chacha~0.3.1Cargo.toml
crates.iorayon1.5.1Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iotempfile3.6.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioxor_name5.0.0Cargo.toml
crates.iopyo30.24.2Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iobrotli~3.3.0Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes1.1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.136Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.34.0Cargo.toml
crates.iohex0.4.3nodejs/Cargo.toml
crates.ionapi2.12.2nodejs/Cargo.toml
crates.ionapi-derive2.12.2nodejs/Cargo.toml
crates.ioself_encryption0.36.1nodejs/Cargo.toml
PyPIclick>=8.1.7pyproject.toml
PyPImaturin>=1.7.8pyproject.toml
PyPIpip>=24.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 212

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 22 direct and 190 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iobincode—direct
crates.ioblake3—direct
crates.iobrotli—direct
crates.iobytes—direct
crates.iochacha20poly1305—direct
crates.iohex—direct
crates.ionapi—direct
crates.ionapi-derive—direct
crates.iopyo3—direct
crates.iorand—direct
crates.iorand_chacha—direct
crates.iorayon—direct
crates.ioself_encryption—direct
crates.ioserde—direct
crates.ioserde_json—direct
crates.iotempfile—direct
crates.iothiserror—direct
crates.iotokio—direct
crates.ioxor_name—direct
PyPIclick—direct
PyPImaturin—direct
PyPIpip—direct
crates.ioclap—indirect
crates.iocriterion—indirect
crates.iodocopt—indirect
crates.ionapi-build—indirect
npm@gerrit0/mini-shiki3.4.2indirect
npm@isaacs/cliui8.0.2indirect
npm@isaacs/fs-minipass4.0.1indirect
npm@mapbox/node-pre-gyp2.0.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/cli2.18.4indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@pkgjs/parseargs0.11.0indirect
npm@rollup/pluginutils5.1.4indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-oniguruma3.4.2indirect
npm@shikijs/langs3.4.2indirect
npm@shikijs/themes3.4.2indirect
npm@shikijs/types3.4.2indirect
npm@shikijs/vscode-textmate10.0.2indirect
npm@sindresorhus/merge-streams2.3.0indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.7indirect
npm@types/hast3.0.4indirect
npm@types/node22.15.19indirect
npm@types/unist3.0.3indirect
npm@vercel/nft0.29.3indirect
npmabbrev3.0.1indirect
npmacorn8.14.1indirect
npmacorn-import-attributes1.9.5indirect
npmacorn-walk8.3.4indirect
npmagent-base7.1.3indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.1.0indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.1indirect
npmargparse1.0.10indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmarray-find-index1.0.2indirect
npmarrgv1.0.2indirect
npmarrify3.0.0indirect
npmasync-sema3.1.1indirect
npmava6.3.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbindings1.5.0indirect
npmblueimp-md52.19.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.1indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmcallsites4.2.0indirect
npmcbor10.0.3indirect
npmchalk5.4.1indirect
npmchownr3.0.0indirect
npmchunkd2.0.1indirect
npmci-info4.2.0indirect
npmci-parallel-vars1.0.1indirect
npmcli-truncate4.0.0indirect
npmcliui8.0.1indirect
npmcode-excerpt4.0.0indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcommon-path-prefix3.0.0indirect
npmconcordance5.0.4indirect
npmconsola3.4.2indirect
npmconvert-to-spaces2.0.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmcurrently-unhandled0.4.1indirect
npmdate-time3.1.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.1indirect
npmdetect-libc2.0.4indirect
npmeastasianwidth0.2.0indirect
npmemittery1.1.0indirect
npmemoji-regex10.4.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex9.2.2indirect
npmentities4.5.0indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp2.0.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp5.0.0indirect
npmesprima4.0.1indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-diff1.3.0indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.3indirect
npmfastq1.19.1indirect
npmfigures6.1.0indirect
npmfile-uri-to-path1.0.0indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfind-up-simple1.0.1indirect
npmforeground-child3.3.1indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-east-asian-width1.3.0indirect
npmglob10.4.5indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglobby14.1.0indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent7.0.6indirect
npmignore7.0.4indirect
npmignore-by-default2.1.0indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npmindent-string5.0.0indirect
npmirregular-plurals3.5.0indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point4.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-plain-object5.0.0indirect
npmis-promise4.0.0indirect
npmis-unicode-supported2.1.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjackspeak3.4.3indirect
npmjs-string-escape1.0.1indirect
npmjs-yaml3.14.1indirect
npmlinkify-it5.0.0indirect
npmload-json-file7.0.1indirect
npmlodash4.17.21indirect
npmlru-cache10.4.3indirect
npmlunr2.3.9indirect
npmmarkdown-it14.1.0indirect
npmmatcher5.0.0indirect
npmmd5-hex3.0.1indirect
npmmdurl2.0.0indirect
npmmemoize10.1.0indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmmimic-function5.0.1indirect
npmminimatch9.0.5indirect
npmminipass7.1.2indirect
npmminizlib3.0.2indirect
npmmkdirp3.0.1indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnode-fetch2.7.0indirect
npmnode-gyp-build4.8.4indirect
npmnofilter3.1.0indirect
npmnopt8.1.0indirect
npmp-map7.0.3indirect
npmpackage-config5.0.0indirect
npmpackage-json-from-dist1.0.1indirect
npmparse-ms4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-scurry1.11.1indirect
npmpath-type6.0.0indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.2indirect
npmplur5.1.0indirect
npmpretty-ms9.2.0indirect
npmpunycode.js2.3.1indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmresolve-cwd3.0.0indirect
npmresolve-from5.0.0indirect
npmreusify1.1.0indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsemver7.7.2indirect
npmserialize-error7.0.1indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmslash5.1.0indirect
npmslice-ansi5.0.0indirect
npmsprintf-js1.0.3indirect
npmstack-utils2.0.6indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring-width5.1.2indirect
npmstring-width7.2.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.1.0indirect
npmsupertap3.0.1indirect
npmtar7.4.3indirect
npmtemp-dir3.0.0indirect
npmtime-zone1.0.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtr460.0.3indirect
npmtype-fest0.13.1indirect
npmtypedoc0.28.4indirect
npmtypescript5.8.3indirect
npmuc.micro2.1.0indirect
npmundici-types6.21.0indirect
npmunicorn-magic0.3.0indirect
npmwebidl-conversions3.0.1indirect
npmwell-known-symbols2.0.0indirect
npmwhatwg-url5.0.0indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi8.1.0indirect
npmwrite-file-atomic6.0.0indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyallist5.0.0indirect
npmyaml2.8.0indirect
npmyargs17.7.2indirect
npmyargs-parser21.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:self_encryption@0.35.0 pulls in 3 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI, crates.io.