Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 14:02 UTC

ZatomicAI / Zatomic.AI.Providers

.NET SDK for integrating with various AI model providers.

C#MIT★ 4 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2025View on GitHub ↗

#ai21labs #amazon-bedrock #anthropic #cohere #deepinfra #fireworksai #google-gemini #meta #mistral #openai #togetherai #xai #hugging-face #hyperbolic #groq #perplexity #moonshot-ai #azure #nvidia #ibm-watson

ZatomicAI/Zatomic.AI.Providers holds a health index of 48 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (91/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (25/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 49 is calibrated to 48 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Zatomic AIOrganization

1 follower1 public reposince Jul 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
NuGet	Zatomic.AI.Providers	5.5.0	-	6	2 days ago	ai21labs anthropic amazonbedrock azureopenai azureserverless cohere deepinfra fireworksai googlegemini groq huggingface hyperbolic ibmwatsonx inception mistral moonshotai nvidia openai perplexity togetherai xai

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

85Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
22.8/36	Commit cadence — 33/52 weeks with commits
17.4/18	Commit volume — 85 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data

Inputs used

commits_last_year	85
human_commit_share	0.97
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	33

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 50 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~25.5 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	50
latest_release_tag	v5.5.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	2
mean_days_between_releases	25.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

35Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

8Critical

How it's scored

7.7/60	Stars — 4 stars
0/25	Forks — 0 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	0
stars	4
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

59Moderate

How it's scored

47.1/80	Total downloads — 34,145 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	Zatomic.AI.Providers
dependents	—
ecosystems	nuget
total_downloads	34,145
monthly_downloads	—
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

42Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

12Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	1
top_contributor_share	1

Issue & PR responsiveness

33At Risk

How it's scored

0/42	Issue resolution — no issues or no data
9.8/30	PR acceptance — 52/159 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data

Inputs used

merged_prs	52
open_issues	0
closed_issues	0
prs_merged_7d	1
prs_decided_7d	1
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	—
closed_unmerged_prs	107
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

39Weak

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
2.2/25	Owner reach — 1 followers of ZatomicAI
6.6/25	Track record — 1 public repos, account ~2 yr old

Inputs used

followers	1
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	ZatomicAI
public_repos	1
account_age_days	799

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20	Version history — 6 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	Zatomic.AI.Providers
ecosystems	nuget
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

25At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

1Critical

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

60Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 20 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	ai21labs, amazon-bedrock, anthropic, cohere, deepinfra, fireworksai, google-gemini, meta, mistral, openai, togetherai, xai, hugging-face, hyperbolic, groq, perplexity, moonshot-ai, azure, nvidia, ibm-watson
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

33At Risk

How it's scored

0/30	Security policy (SECURITY.md)
25/25	Dependabot config
0/25	Dependency lockfiles — no dependency manifests — not applicable
0/20	CodeQL workflow

Inputs used

source	file_signals
lockfiles	—
manifests	—
has_codeql_workflow	no
has_security_policy	no
has_dependabot_config	yes

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	8
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 8 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

23At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.ai21.com/llms.txt)
8.2/40	Legible commit history — 15 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://docs.ai21.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.155
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

35Weak

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — src/Zatomic.AI.Providers.Samples/Zatomic.AI.Providers.Samples.csproj, src/Zatomic.AI.Providers/Zatomic.AI.Providers.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10	Reproducible environment
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	—
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	src/Zatomic.AI.Providers.Samples/Zatomic.AI.Providers.Samples.csproj, src/Zatomic.AI.Providers/Zatomic.AI.Providers.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.03

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/508 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	C#
largest_source_bytes	6,651
source_files_sampled	508
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

4GitHub stars

1contributors

85commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

50releases

1bus factor

0open issues

—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (exit code 0; Skipping github.com/ZatomicAI/Zatomic.AI.Providers: run: internal error: ListCommits:error during graphqlHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Something went wrong while executing your query on 2026-09-15T14:02:30Z. Please include `DB56:20415A:A6185DD:A201D7E:6AA94FF4` when reporting this issue.); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Direct dependencies 8

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json	`10.0.12`	src/Zatomic.AI.Providers.Samples/Zatomic.AI.Providers.Samples.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk	`18.10.1`	src/Zatomic.AI.Providers.Samples/Zatomic.AI.Providers.Samples.csproj
NuGet	NUnit	`4.6.1`	src/Zatomic.AI.Providers.Samples/Zatomic.AI.Providers.Samples.csproj
NuGet	NUnit3TestAdapter	`6.3.0`	src/Zatomic.AI.Providers.Samples/Zatomic.AI.Providers.Samples.csproj
NuGet	AWSSDK.Bedrock	`4.0.102.2`	src/Zatomic.AI.Providers/Zatomic.AI.Providers.csproj
NuGet	AWSSDK.BedrockRuntime	`4.0.101.7`	src/Zatomic.AI.Providers/Zatomic.AI.Providers.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration	`10.0.12`	src/Zatomic.AI.Providers/Zatomic.AI.Providers.csproj
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.4`	src/Zatomic.AI.Providers/Zatomic.AI.Providers.csproj

All dependencies 8

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
NuGet	AWSSDK.Bedrock	`4.0.102.2`	direct
NuGet	AWSSDK.BedrockRuntime	`4.0.101.7`	direct
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration	`10.0.12`	direct
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json	`10.0.12`	direct
NuGet	Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk	`18.10.1`	direct
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.4`	direct
NuGet	NUnit	`4.6.1`	direct
NuGet	NUnit3TestAdapter	`6.3.0`	direct

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 8 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records