Public record
Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-03 22:59 UTC

Zonit / Zonit.Extensions

C#MIT★ 6 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2025View on GitHub ↗

Zonit/Zonit.Extensions holds a health index of 36 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (46/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (32/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

36
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

36
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 41 is calibrated to 36 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ZonitOrganization
10 followers18 public repossince Jun 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetZonit.Extensions.Website.MudBlazor0.2.4-2200 days agozonitextensionsmudblazorblazorvalueobjectsconvertersformsvalidation

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

41Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence9/52 weeks with commits
15.6/18Commit volume54 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year54
human_commit_share0.97
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year9
How it's scored
0/27Ships releasesno releases published
0/36Release recencyno releases
0/27Release cadenceno releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

32At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
11.3/60Stars6 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars6
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
31.9/80Total downloads1,171 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesZonit.Extensions.Website.MudBlazor
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads1,171
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

46Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
25.2/42Issue resolution60% of issues closed
4/30PR acceptance2/15 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs2
open_issues4
closed_issues6
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.6
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
7.5/25Owner reach10 followers of Zonit
15.6/25Track record18 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers10
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginZonit
public_repos18
account_age_days1,149
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
26/35Publish recencylatest publish 200 days ago
12/20Version history2 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesZonit.Extensions.Website.MudBlazor
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish200

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

41Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
37.2/40Legible commit history67 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.698
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapSource/Zonit.Extensions.Auth/Zonit.Extensions.Auth.csproj, Source/Zonit.Extensions.Cultures/Zonit.Extensions.Cultures.csproj, Source/Zonit.Extensions.Organizations/Zonit.Extensions.Organizations.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 99
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsSource/Zonit.Extensions.Auth/Zonit.Extensions.Auth.csproj, Source/Zonit.Extensions.Cultures/Zonit.Extensions.Cultures.csproj, Source/Zonit.Extensions.Organizations/Zonit.Extensions.Organizations.csproj, Source/Zonit.Extensions.Projects/Zonit.Extensions.Projects.csproj, Source/Zonit.Extensions.Tenants.SourceGenerators/Zonit.Extensions.Tenants.SourceGenerators.csproj, Source/Zonit.Extensions.Tenants/Zonit.Extensions.Tenants.csproj, Source/Zonit.Extensions.Website.MudBlazor/Zonit.Extensions.Website.MudBlazor.csproj, Source/Zonit.Extensions.Website.SourceGenerators/Zonit.Extensions.Website.SourceGenerators.csproj, Source/Zonit.Extensions.Website/Zonit.Extensions.Website.csproj, Source/Zonit.Extensions/Zonit.Extensions.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/215 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes35,500
source_files_sampled215
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

6GitHub stars
1contributors
54commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
4open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-03 22:59 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.AbstractionsSource/Zonit.Extensions.Auth/Zonit.Extensions.Auth.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.AbstractionsSource/Zonit.Extensions.Cultures/Zonit.Extensions.Cultures.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensionsSource/Zonit.Extensions.Cultures/Zonit.Extensions.Cultures.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.AbstractionsSource/Zonit.Extensions.Organizations/Zonit.Extensions.Organizations.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.AbstractionsSource/Zonit.Extensions.Projects/Zonit.Extensions.Projects.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharpSource/Zonit.Extensions.Tenants.SourceGenerators/Zonit.Extensions.Tenants.SourceGenerators.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.AnalyzersSource/Zonit.Extensions.Tenants.SourceGenerators/Zonit.Extensions.Tenants.SourceGenerators.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.AbstractionsSource/Zonit.Extensions.Tenants/Zonit.Extensions.Tenants.csproj
NuGetMudBlazorSource/Zonit.Extensions.Website.MudBlazor/Zonit.Extensions.Website.MudBlazor.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharpSource/Zonit.Extensions.Website.SourceGenerators/Zonit.Extensions.Website.SourceGenerators.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.AnalyzersSource/Zonit.Extensions.Website.SourceGenerators/Zonit.Extensions.Website.SourceGenerators.csproj
NuGetDiacriticsSource/Zonit.Extensions/Zonit.Extensions.csproj
All dependencies 6

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetDiacriticsdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzersdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharpdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractionsdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensionsdirect
NuGetMudBlazordirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.