Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 20:07 UTC

a2aproject / a2a-python

Official Python SDK for the Agent2Agent (A2A) Protocol

PythonApache-2.0★ 2,148 stars⑂ 497 forkssince May 2025View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryNetwork serviceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

#agents #generative-ai #a2a #a2a-client #a2a-mcp #a2a-protocol #a2a-server #agent2agent

a2aproject/a2a-python holds a health index of 98 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Security (76/100). It was last updated today. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 88 is calibrated to 98 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Agent2Agent (A2A) ProjectOrganization

1,720 followers18 public repossince Jun 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	a2a-sdk	1.1.4	10,991,418	59	0 days ago	a2a a2a-protocol a2a-sdk agent-2-agent agent2agent

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

94Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
30.5/36	Commit cadence — 44/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 415 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 10 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	415
human_commit_share	0.87
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	44

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 59 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 10 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~15.7 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	59
latest_release_tag	v1.1.4
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	10
mean_days_between_releases	15.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

91Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

84Excellent

How it's scored

54/60	Stars — 2,148 stars
22.5/25	Forks — 497 forks
8/15	Watchers — 28 watchers

Inputs used

forks	497
stars	2,148
watchers	28
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	5
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 10,991,418 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	a2a-sdk
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	10,991,418
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

83Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

85Excellent

How it's scored

43.2/54	Bus factor — 4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 20% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 92 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	4
contributors_sampled	92
top_contributor_share	0.196

Issue & PR responsiveness

86Excellent

How it's scored

37.4/42	Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed
23.7/30	PR acceptance — 699/884 decided PRs merged
9.8/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 9/12 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	699
open_issues	31
closed_issues	250
prs_merged_7d	8
prs_decided_7d	13
prs_merged_30d	26
prs_decided_30d	36
issue_closed_ratio	0.89
closed_unmerged_prs	185
first_time_authors_30d	8
first_time_prs_merged_30d	9
first_time_prs_decided_30d	12

Ownership & stewardship

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
23.3/25	Owner reach — 1,720 followers of a2aproject
11.8/25	Track record — 18 public repos, account ~1 yr old

Inputs used

followers	1,720
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	a2aproject
public_repos	18
account_age_days	454

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20	Version history — 59 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	a2a-sdk
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 16 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://a2a-protocol.org/latest/sdk/python/api/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 8 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	agents, generative-ai, a2a, a2a-client, a2a-mcp, a2a-protocol, a2a-server, agent2agent
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://a2a-protocol.org/latest/sdk/python/api/
docs_site	https://a2a-protocol.org/latest/sdk/python/api/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

76Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

70Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 10 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
2.5/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 5
4.5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
1.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 8 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	15
affected_packages	5
assessed_packages	123
unassessed_packages	9
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 3, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 123 resolved dependencies against OSV. 9 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

85Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://a2a-protocol.org/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 87 of 87 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://a2a-protocol.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	1,740

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

76Good

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11	Static type checking — src/a2a/py.typed
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 6 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 13 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
4/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	uv.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	src/a2a/py.typed
agent_commit_share	0.06
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.13

Code legibility for models

81Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/a2a/py.typed)
54.1/55	Manageable file sizes — 4/246 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	110,980
source_files_sampled	246
oversized_source_files	4

Machine-readable interfaces

80Excellent

How it's scored

40/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — src/a2a/compat/v0_3/a2a_v0_3.proto
0/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — samples

Inputs used

example_dirs	samples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	src/a2a/compat/v0_3/a2a_v0_3.proto
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

2,148GitHub stars

92contributors

415commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

59releases

4bus factor

31open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 16 authors (cap 12)
Could not fetch pypi package 'itk-python-v10-agent' from its registry
deps.dev does not index pypi:a2a-sdk@1.1.4; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 497 ⇿

0Stars

497Forks

59Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 2Patch 49

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.0 / 10

7.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 20:06 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
10	Contributors	project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 10 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
4	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
5	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 5
9	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2	Vulnerabilities	8 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 17

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	a2a-sdk	`—`	itk/pyproject.toml
PyPI	fastapi	`—`	itk/pyproject.toml
PyPI	uvicorn	`—`	itk/pyproject.toml
PyPI	grpcio	`—`	itk/pyproject.toml
PyPI	grpcio-tools	`—`	itk/pyproject.toml
PyPI	protobuf	`—`	itk/pyproject.toml
PyPI	sse-starlette	`—`	itk/pyproject.toml
PyPI	httpx-sse	`—`	itk/pyproject.toml
PyPI	packaging	`—`	itk/pyproject.toml
PyPI	httpx	`>=0.28.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pydantic	`>=2.11.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	protobuf	`>=5.29.5,<7`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	google-api-core	`>=1.26.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	json-rpc	`>=1.15.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	googleapis-common-protos	`>=1.70.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	culsans	`>=0.11.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	packaging	`>=24.0`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 132

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 29 direct and 103 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	a2a-sdk	`—`	direct
PyPI	culsans	`0.11.0`	direct
PyPI	fastapi	`—`	direct
PyPI	fastapi	`0.136.3`	direct
PyPI	fastapi	`0.140.13`	direct
PyPI	google-api-core	`2.31.0`	direct
PyPI	google-api-core	`2.33.0`	direct
PyPI	googleapis-common-protos	`1.75.0`	direct
PyPI	grpcio	`—`	direct
PyPI	grpcio	`1.81.0`	direct
PyPI	grpcio	`1.83.0`	direct
PyPI	grpcio-tools	`—`	direct
PyPI	grpcio-tools	`1.81.0`	direct
PyPI	grpcio-tools	`1.81.1`	direct
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	direct
PyPI	httpx-sse	`—`	direct
PyPI	httpx-sse	`0.4.3`	direct
PyPI	json-rpc	`1.15.0`	direct
PyPI	packaging	`—`	direct
PyPI	packaging	`26.2`	direct
PyPI	protobuf	`—`	direct
PyPI	protobuf	`6.33.6`	direct
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.4`	direct
PyPI	sse-starlette	`—`	direct
PyPI	sse-starlette	`3.4.4`	direct
PyPI	sse-starlette	`3.4.6`	direct
PyPI	uvicorn	`—`	direct
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.49.0`	direct
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.51.0`	direct
PyPI	aiologic	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	aiologic	`0.17.1`	indirect
PyPI	aiomysql	`0.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	aiosqlite	`0.22.1`	indirect
PyPI	alembic	`1.18.4`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-doc	`0.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-doc	`0.0.5`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.12.1`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.14.2`	indirect
PyPI	async-timeout	`5.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	asyncpg	`0.31.0`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`26.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	backports-asyncio-runner	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.2.25`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.7.22`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	cfgv	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.9`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.13.5`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`48.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`49.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	distlib	`0.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	dunamai	`1.26.0`	indirect
PyPI	exceptiongroup	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	execnet	`2.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.25.2`	indirect
PyPI	google-auth	`2.49.1`	indirect
PyPI	google-auth	`2.56.2`	indirect
PyPI	greenlet	`3.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	greenlet	`3.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	grpcio-reflection	`1.81.0`	indirect
PyPI	grpcio-reflection	`1.81.1`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	hatchling	`1.29.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	identify	`2.6.18`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.15`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.18`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	itk-python-v10-agent	`0.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	mako	`1.3.12`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	nodeenv	`1.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-api	`1.42.1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-sdk	`1.42.1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-semantic-conventions	`0.63b1`	indirect
PyPI	outcome	`1.3.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.9.4`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	pre-commit	`4.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	proto-plus	`1.27.1`	indirect
PyPI	proto-plus	`1.28.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyasn1	`0.6.4`	indirect
PyPI	pyasn1-modules	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.46.4`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyjwt	`2.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	pymysql	`1.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-cov	`7.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-mock	`3.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-timeout	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-xdist	`3.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-discovery	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.33.0`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	indirect
PyPI	respx	`0.23.1`	indirect
PyPI	rfc8785	`0.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.15.16`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`83.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sniffio	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	sortedcontainers	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	sqlalchemy	`2.0.48`	indirect
PyPI	sqlalchemy	`2.0.51`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`1.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomlkit	`0.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	trio	`0.33.0`	indirect
PyPI	trove-classifiers	`2026.1.14.14`	indirect
PyPI	ty	`0.0.44`	indirect
PyPI	types-protobuf	`6.32.1.20260221`	indirect
PyPI	types-requests	`2.33.0.20260518`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	uv-dynamic-versioning	`0.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	virtualenv	`21.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	wrapt	`2.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	wrapt	`2.3.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 123 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 9 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
anyio	`4.12.1`	indirect	critical	2	`4.14.2`
click	`8.3.1`	indirect	high	1	`8.3.3`
cryptography	`48.0.1`	indirect	high	6	`50.0.0`
starlette	`1.2.1`	indirect	high	4	`1.3.1`
cryptography	`49.0.0`	indirect	moderate	2	`50.0.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records