Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-03 01:07 UTC

adobe / trustmark

TrustMark - Universal Watermarking for Arbitrary Resolution Images

JavaScript · PythonCustom license★ 149 stars⑂ 33 forkssince Dec 2023View on GitHub ↗

#cai #content-authenticity #provenance #watermarking

adobe/trustmark holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (82/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (47/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Adobe, Inc.Organization · verified domain

3,318 followers1,121 public repossince Nov 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	trustmark	0.9.2	26,880	7	24 days ago	watermarking cai watermark content-authenticity-initiative provenance
crates.io	trustmark	0.4.0	2,831	6	3 days ago	cv trustmark watermark
PyPI	trustmark-hailo	0.1.0	0	1	3 days ago	—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

64Moderate

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 3 days ago
4.8/36	Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
13.6/18	Commit volume — 32 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 24 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	32
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	3
active_weeks_last_year	7

Release discipline

84Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 1 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 3 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	1
latest_release_tag	rust-v0.3.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	3
mean_days_between_releases	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

73Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

54Moderate

How it's scored

35.2/60	Stars — 149 stars
12.5/25	Forks — 33 forks
5.8/15	Watchers — 12 watchers

Inputs used

forks	33
stars	149
watchers	12
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

94Exceptional

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
16.9/22.5	License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
7.2/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	yes
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

74Good

How it's scored

59.6/80	Monthly downloads — 29,711 downloads/month across crates, pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	trustmark, trustmark, trustmark-hailo
dependents	—
ecosystems	crates, pypi
total_downloads	28,497
monthly_downloads	29,711
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

82Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

64Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 31% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 13 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	13
top_contributor_share	0.308

Issue & PR responsiveness

73Good

How it's scored

31.5/42	Issue resolution — 75% of issues closed
23.3/30	PR acceptance — 21/27 decided PRs merged
11.1/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 6/7 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 7/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

merged_prs	21
open_issues	4
closed_issues	12
prs_merged_7d	5
prs_decided_7d	6
prs_merged_30d	6
prs_decided_30d	8
issue_closed_ratio	0.75
closed_unmerged_prs	6
first_time_authors_30d	4
first_time_prs_merged_30d	6
first_time_prs_decided_30d	7

Ownership & stewardship

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 3,318 followers of adobe
25/25	Track record — 1,121 public repos, account ~15 yr old

Inputs used

followers	3,318
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	adobe
public_repos	1,121
account_age_days	5,805

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on crates, pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20	Version history — 7 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	trustmark, trustmark, trustmark-hailo
ecosystems	crates, pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

48Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

30At Risk

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
6/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 3 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18297
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 4 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	cai, content-authenticity, provenance, watermarking
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18297
docs_site	https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18297
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

44Weak

How it's scored

6/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0.8/2.5	CI-Tests — 3 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 7/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 24 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 29 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	4.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	52
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:trustmark@0.9.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 52 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

47Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

68Good

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — python/CLAUDE.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
23.5/40	Legible commit history — 44 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.44
agent_instruction_files	python/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	7,247

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

29At Risk

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — rust/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/trustmark-cli/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/xtask/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
6/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	Cargo.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.03
toolchain_manifests	rust/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/trustmark-cli/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/xtask/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

53Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
52.9/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/52 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	333,595
source_files_sampled	52
oversized_source_files	2

Key facts

149GitHub stars

13contributors

32commits, last 12 months

3days since last push

1releases

2bus factor

4open issues

crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 33 ⇿

0Stars

33Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10

4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-03 01:06 UTC

8	Binary-Artifacts	binaries present in source code
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
3	CI-Tests	3 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5	Code-Review	Found 7/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10	Contributors	project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
9	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	24 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	29 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 15

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	numpy	`<2`	python-hailo/pyproject.toml
PyPI	pillow	`—`	python-hailo/pyproject.toml
PyPI	omegaconf	`>=2.1`	python/pyproject.toml
PyPI	numpy	`>=1.20.0`	python/pyproject.toml
PyPI	torch	`>=2.3.1`	python/pyproject.toml
PyPI	torchvision	`>=0.18.1`	python/pyproject.toml
PyPI	lightning	`>=2.0`	python/pyproject.toml
PyPI	six	`>=1.9`	python/pyproject.toml
PyPI	einops	`>=0.4.0`	python/pyproject.toml
crates.io	image	`0.25.6`	rust/Cargo.toml
crates.io	fast_image_resize	`5.1.4`	rust/Cargo.toml
crates.io	ndarray	`0.16`	rust/Cargo.toml
crates.io	ort	`=2.0.0-rc.10`	rust/Cargo.toml
crates.io	ort-sys	`=2.0.0-rc.10`	rust/Cargo.toml
crates.io	thiserror	`1`	rust/Cargo.toml

All dependencies 297

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 16 direct and 281 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	fast_image_resize	`5.5.0`	direct
crates.io	image	`—`	direct
crates.io	image	`0.25.10`	direct
crates.io	ndarray	`0.16.1`	direct
crates.io	ort	`2.0.0-rc.10`	direct
crates.io	ort-sys	`2.0.0-rc.10`	direct
crates.io	thiserror	`1.0.69`	direct
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0.21`	direct
PyPI	einops	`—`	direct
PyPI	lightning	`—`	direct
PyPI	numpy	`—`	direct
PyPI	omegaconf	`—`	direct
PyPI	pillow	`—`	direct
PyPI	six	`—`	direct
PyPI	torch	`—`	direct
PyPI	torchvision	`—`	direct
crates.io	adler2	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	aligned	`0.4.3`	indirect
crates.io	aligned-vec	`0.6.4`	indirect
crates.io	anes	`0.1.6`	indirect
crates.io	anstream	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle	`1.0.14`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-parse	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-query	`1.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-wincon	`3.0.11`	indirect
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.104`	indirect
crates.io	arbitrary	`1.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	arg_enum_proc_macro	`0.3.4`	indirect
crates.io	arrayvec	`0.7.8`	indirect
crates.io	as-slice	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	av-scenechange	`0.14.1`	indirect
crates.io	av1-grain	`0.2.5`	indirect
crates.io	avif-serialize	`0.8.9`	indirect
crates.io	base64	`0.22.1`	indirect
crates.io	base64	`0.23.1`	indirect
crates.io	base64ct	`1.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	bit_field	`0.10.3`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.13.2`	indirect
crates.io	bitstream-io	`4.10.0`	indirect
crates.io	block-buffer	`0.10.4`	indirect
crates.io	built	`0.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	bumpalo	`3.20.3`	indirect
crates.io	bytemuck	`1.25.2`	indirect
crates.io	byteorder	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	byteorder-lite	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	bytes	`1.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	cast	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	ciborium	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	ciborium-io	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	ciborium-ll	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	clap	`—`	indirect
crates.io	clap	`4.6.7`	indirect
crates.io	clap_builder	`4.6.7`	indirect
crates.io	clap_derive	`4.6.7`	indirect
crates.io	clap_lex	`1.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	color_quant	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	colorchoice	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation	`0.10.1`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation-sys	`0.8.7`	indirect
crates.io	cpufeatures	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	crc32fast	`1.5.2`	indirect
crates.io	criterion	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	criterion-plot	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-deque	`0.8.8`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.21`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-utils	`0.8.23`	indirect
crates.io	crunchy	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	crypto-common	`0.1.7`	indirect
crates.io	der	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	digest	`0.10.7`	indirect
crates.io	displaydoc	`0.2.7`	indirect
crates.io	document-features	`0.2.12`	indirect
crates.io	either	`1.18.0`	indirect
crates.io	equator	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	equator-macro	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	errno	`0.3.14`	indirect
crates.io	exr	`1.74.2`	indirect
crates.io	fastrand	`2.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	fax	`0.2.7`	indirect
crates.io	fdeflate	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	filetime	`0.2.29`	indirect
crates.io	find-msvc-tools	`0.1.14`	indirect
crates.io	flate2	`1.1.10`	indirect
crates.io	foreign-types	`0.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	foreign-types-shared	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	form_urlencoded	`1.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	futures-core	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-task	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-util	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	generic-array	`0.14.7`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.3.4`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.4.3`	indirect
crates.io	gif	`0.14.2`	indirect
crates.io	half	`2.7.1`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	hermit-abi	`0.5.3`	indirect
crates.io	http	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	httparse	`1.10.1`	indirect
crates.io	icu_collections	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_locale_core	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_normalizer	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_normalizer_data	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_properties	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_properties_data	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_provider	`2.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	idna	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	idna_adapter	`1.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	image-webp	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	imgref	`1.12.3`	indirect
crates.io	interpolate_name	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	is-terminal	`0.4.17`	indirect
crates.io	is_terminal_polyfill	`1.70.2`	indirect
crates.io	itertools	`0.10.5`	indirect
crates.io	itertools	`0.14.0`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	jobserver	`0.1.35`	indirect
crates.io	js-sys	`0.3.106`	indirect
crates.io	lebe	`0.5.3`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.189`	indirect
crates.io	libfuzzer-sys	`0.4.13`	indirect
crates.io	libm	`0.2.16`	indirect
crates.io	linux-raw-sys	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	litemap	`0.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	litrs	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	log	`0.4.34`	indirect
crates.io	loop9	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	matrixmultiply	`0.3.11`	indirect
crates.io	maybe-rayon	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	miniz_oxide	`0.8.9`	indirect
crates.io	miniz_oxide	`0.9.1`	indirect
crates.io	moxcms	`0.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	native-tls	`0.2.18`	indirect
crates.io	new_debug_unreachable	`1.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	no_std_io2	`0.9.4`	indirect
crates.io	nom	`8.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	noop_proc_macro	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	num-bigint	`0.4.8`	indirect
crates.io	num-complex	`0.4.6`	indirect
crates.io	num-derive	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	num-integer	`0.1.47`	indirect
crates.io	num-rational	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.19`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.4`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell_polyfill	`1.70.2`	indirect
crates.io	oorandom	`11.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	openssl	`0.10.81`	indirect
crates.io	openssl-macros	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	openssl-probe	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	openssl-sys	`0.9.117`	indirect
crates.io	paste	`1.0.15`	indirect
crates.io	pastey	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	pem-rfc7468	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	percent-encoding	`2.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	pin-project-lite	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	pkg-config	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	plotters	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	plotters-backend	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	plotters-svg	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	png	`0.18.1`	indirect
crates.io	portable-atomic	`1.15.0`	indirect
crates.io	portable-atomic-util	`0.2.8`	indirect
crates.io	potential_utf	`0.1.6`	indirect
crates.io	ppv-lite86	`0.2.21`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.107`	indirect
crates.io	profiling	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	profiling-procmacros	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	pulp	`0.22.3`	indirect
crates.io	pulp-wasm-simd-flag	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	pxfm	`0.1.30`	indirect
crates.io	qoi	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	quick-error	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.47`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`5.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`6.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	rand	`—`	indirect
crates.io	rand	`0.8.8`	indirect
crates.io	rand	`0.9.5`	indirect
crates.io	rand_chacha	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	rand_chacha	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	rand_core	`0.6.4`	indirect
crates.io	rand_core	`0.9.5`	indirect
crates.io	rav1e	`0.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	ravif	`0.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	raw-cpuid	`11.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	rawpointer	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	rayon	`1.12.0`	indirect
crates.io	rayon-core	`1.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	reborrow	`0.5.5`	indirect
crates.io	regex	`1.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.18`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.11`	indirect
crates.io	rgb	`0.8.53`	indirect
crates.io	ring	`0.17.14`	indirect
crates.io	rustix	`1.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	rustls	`0.23.45`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-pki-types	`1.15.1`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-webpki	`0.103.15`	indirect
crates.io	rustversion	`1.0.23`	indirect
crates.io	same-file	`1.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	schannel	`0.1.29`	indirect
crates.io	security-framework	`3.7.0`	indirect
crates.io	security-framework-sys	`2.17.0`	indirect
crates.io	serde	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.151`	indirect
crates.io	sha2	`0.10.9`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	simd-adler32	`0.3.10`	indirect
crates.io	simd_helpers	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	slab	`0.4.12`	indirect
crates.io	smallvec	`1.16.2`	indirect
crates.io	smallvec	`2.0.0-alpha.10`	indirect
crates.io	socks	`0.3.4`	indirect
crates.io	stable_deref_trait	`1.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	strsim	`0.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	subtle	`2.6.1`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.119`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`3.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	synstructure	`0.14.0`	indirect
crates.io	tar	`0.4.46`	indirect
crates.io	tempfile	`3.27.0`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`1.0.69`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`2.0.21`	indirect
crates.io	tiff	`0.11.3`	indirect
crates.io	tinystr	`0.8.4`	indirect
crates.io	tinytemplate	`1.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	tracing	`0.1.44`	indirect
crates.io	tracing-core	`0.1.36`	indirect
crates.io	typenum	`1.20.1`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.26`	indirect
crates.io	untrusted	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	ureq	`—`	indirect
crates.io	ureq	`2.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	ureq	`3.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	ureq-proto	`0.6.4`	indirect
crates.io	url	`2.5.8`	indirect
crates.io	utf8-zero	`0.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	utf8_iter	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	utf8parse	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	v_frame	`0.3.9`	indirect
crates.io	vcpkg	`0.2.15`	indirect
crates.io	version_check	`0.9.5`	indirect
crates.io	walkdir	`2.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	wasip2	`1.0.4+wasi-0.2.12`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen	`0.2.129`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro	`0.2.129`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro-support	`0.2.129`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-shared	`0.2.129`	indirect
crates.io	web-sys	`0.3.106`	indirect
crates.io	webpki-root-certs	`1.0.9`	indirect
crates.io	webpki-roots	`0.26.11`	indirect
crates.io	webpki-roots	`1.0.9`	indirect
crates.io	weezl	`0.1.12`	indirect
crates.io	winapi	`0.3.9`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-util	`0.1.11`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.52.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.61.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen	`0.57.1`	indirect
crates.io	writeable	`0.6.4`	indirect
crates.io	xattr	`1.6.1`	indirect
crates.io	y4m	`0.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	yoke	`0.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	yoke-derive	`0.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy	`0.8.59`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy-derive	`0.8.59`	indirect
crates.io	zerofrom	`0.1.8`	indirect
crates.io	zerofrom-derive	`0.1.8`	indirect
crates.io	zeroize	`1.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	zerotrie	`0.2.5`	indirect
crates.io	zerovec	`0.11.8`	indirect
crates.io	zerovec-derive	`0.11.6`	indirect
crates.io	zlib-rs	`0.6.8`	indirect
crates.io	zmij	`1.0.23`	indirect
crates.io	zune-core	`0.5.3`	indirect
crates.io	zune-inflate	`0.2.54`	indirect
crates.io	zune-jpeg	`0.5.15`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:trustmark@0.9.2 pulls in 52 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI, crates.io.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records