Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 18:09 UTC

affinidi / affinidi-tdk-rs

Affinidi Trust Development Kit - Rust

RustApache-2.0★ 14 stars⑂ 12 forkssince Mar 2025View on GitHub ↗

affinidi/affinidi-tdk-rs holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (80/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (48/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AffinidiOrganization · verified domain

61 followers62 public repossince Sep 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

58Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

96Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
32.5/36	Commit cadence — 47/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 549 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	549
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	47

Release discipline

1Critical

How it's scored

0/27	Ships releases — no releases published
0/36	Release recency — no releases
0/27	Release cadence — no releases
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

28At Risk

How it's scored

18.1/60	Stars — 14 stars
8.7/25	Forks — 12 forks
1.7/15	Watchers — 3 watchers

Inputs used

forks	12
stars	14
watchers	3
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

31At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.9/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 87% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 14 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	14
top_contributor_share	0.871

Issue & PR responsiveness

70Good

How it's scored

32.8/42	Issue resolution — 78% of issues closed
28.4/30	PR acceptance — 624/659 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	624
open_issues	13
closed_issues	46
prs_merged_7d	11
prs_decided_7d	11
prs_merged_30d	46
prs_decided_30d	46
issue_closed_ratio	0.78
closed_unmerged_prs	35
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

88Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
12.9/25	Owner reach — 61 followers of affinidi
25/25	Track record — 62 public repos, account ~6 yr old

Inputs used

followers	61
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	affinidi
public_repos	62
account_age_days	2,533

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 9 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints])
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 1 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	affinidi
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

69Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

61Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
5/5	Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	6.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	1
unassessed_packages	190
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 1 resolved dependencies against OSV. 190 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

63Moderate

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, crates/applications/affinidi-meeting-place/Cargo.toml, crates/core/affinidi-bbs/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints])
11/11	Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
0/10	Reproducible environment
4/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
2/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	—
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.02
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml, crates/applications/affinidi-meeting-place/Cargo.toml, crates/core/affinidi-bbs/Cargo.toml, crates/core/affinidi-cesr/Cargo.toml, crates/core/affinidi-crypto/Cargo.toml, crates/core/affinidi-encoding/Cargo.toml, crates/core/affinidi-rate-limit/Cargo.toml, crates/core/affinidi-secrets-resolver/Cargo.toml, crates/core/affinidi-task-utils/Cargo.toml, crates/credentials/affinidi-data-integrity/Cargo.toml, crates/credentials/affinidi-mdoc/Cargo.toml, crates/credentials/affinidi-rdf-encoding/Cargo.toml, crates/credentials/affinidi-sd-jwt-vc/Cargo.toml, crates/credentials/affinidi-sd-jwt/Cargo.toml, crates/credentials/affinidi-sd-jwt/fuzz/Cargo.toml, crates/credentials/affinidi-status-list/Cargo.toml, crates/credentials/affinidi-vc/Cargo.toml, crates/identity/affinidi-did-authentication/Cargo.toml, crates/identity/affinidi-did-common/Cargo.toml, crates/identity/affinidi-did-resolver-cache-sdk/Cargo.toml, crates/identity/affinidi-did-resolver-cache-server/Cargo.toml, crates/identity/affinidi-did-resolver-traits/Cargo.toml, crates/identity/did-methods/did-ebsi/Cargo.toml, crates/identity/did-methods/did-ethr/Cargo.toml, crates/identity/did-methods/did-example/Cargo.toml, crates/identity/did-methods/did-jwk/Cargo.toml, crates/identity/did-methods/did-pkh/Cargo.toml, crates/identity/did-methods/did-scid/Cargo.toml, crates/identity/did-methods/did-web/Cargo.toml, crates/identity/shortcuts/agent-names/Cargo.toml, crates/messaging/affinidi-messaging-core/Cargo.toml, crates/messaging/affinidi-messaging-delivery/Cargo.toml, crates/messaging/affinidi-messaging-didcomm-service/Cargo.toml, crates/messaging/affinidi-messaging-didcomm-v1/Cargo.toml, crates/messaging/affinidi-messaging-didcomm/Cargo.toml, crates/messaging/affinidi-messaging-didcomm/fuzz/Cargo.toml, crates/messaging/affinidi-messaging-helpers/Cargo.toml, crates/messaging/affinidi-messaging-mediator/Cargo.toml, crates/messaging/affinidi-messaging-mediator/affinidi-messaging-mediator-common/Cargo.toml, crates/messaging/affinidi-messaging-mediator/affinidi-messaging-mediator-config/Cargo.toml, crates/messaging/affinidi-messaging-mediator/affinidi-messaging-mediator-processors/Cargo.toml, crates/messaging/affinidi-messaging-mediator/tools/mediator-monitor/Cargo.toml, crates/messaging/affinidi-messaging-mediator/tools/mediator-setup/Cargo.toml, crates/messaging/affinidi-messaging-sdk/Cargo.toml, crates/messaging/affinidi-messaging-test-mediator/Cargo.toml, crates/messaging/affinidi-messaging-text-client/Cargo.toml, crates/messaging/affinidi-tsp/Cargo.toml, crates/protocols/affinidi-oid4vc-core/Cargo.toml, crates/protocols/affinidi-openid4vci/Cargo.toml, crates/protocols/affinidi-openid4vp/Cargo.toml, crates/protocols/affinidi-siopv2/Cargo.toml, crates/tdk/affinidi-tdk-common/Cargo.toml, crates/tdk/affinidi-tdk-test-support/Cargo.toml, crates/tdk/affinidi-tdk/Cargo.toml, crates/trust/affinidi-trust-lists/Cargo.toml, interop/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
53.6/55	Manageable file sizes — 19/741 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	329,823
source_files_sampled	741
oversized_source_files	19

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples, sample

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples, sample
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

14GitHub stars

14contributors

549commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

0releases

1bus factor

13open issues

crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch crates package 'tsp-interop' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 12 ⇿

0Stars

12Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10

6.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 18:08 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
6	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
10	Fuzzing	project is fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
2	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 13

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	affinidi-tsp	`—`	interop/Cargo.toml
crates.io	tsp_sdk	`—`	interop/Cargo.toml
crates.io	ed25519-dalek	`3`	interop/Cargo.toml
crates.io	x25519-dalek	`3`	interop/Cargo.toml
crates.io	rand_core	`0.6`	interop/Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde_json	`1`	interop/Cargo.toml
crates.io	base64ct	`1`	interop/Cargo.toml
crates.io	url	`2`	interop/Cargo.toml
npm	@credo-ts/askar	`^0.6.3`	interop/didcomm-v1/package.json
npm	@credo-ts/core	`^0.6.3`	interop/didcomm-v1/package.json
npm	@credo-ts/didcomm	`^0.6.3`	interop/didcomm-v1/package.json
npm	@credo-ts/node	`^0.6.3`	interop/didcomm-v1/package.json
npm	@openwallet-foundation/askar-nodejs	`^0.4.3`	interop/didcomm-v1/package.json

All dependencies 191

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 179 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	affinidi-tsp	`—`	direct
crates.io	base64ct	`—`	direct
crates.io	ed25519-dalek	`—`	direct
crates.io	rand_core	`—`	direct
crates.io	serde_json	`—`	direct
crates.io	url	`—`	direct
crates.io	x25519-dalek	`—`	direct
npm	@credo-ts/askar	`^0.6.3`	direct
npm	@credo-ts/core	`^0.6.3`	direct
npm	@credo-ts/didcomm	`^0.6.3`	direct
npm	@credo-ts/node	`^0.6.3`	direct
npm	@openwallet-foundation/askar-nodejs	`^0.4.3`	direct
crates.io	aes	`—`	indirect
crates.io	aes-gcm	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-bbs	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-cesr	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-crypto	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-data-integrity	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-did-authentication	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-did-common	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-did-ethr	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-did-jwk	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-did-pkh	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-did-resolver-cache-sdk	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-did-resolver-traits	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-did-web	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-encoding	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-mdoc	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-meeting-place	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-messaging-core	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-messaging-didcomm	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-messaging-didcomm-v1	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-messaging-mediator	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-messaging-mediator-common	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-messaging-mediator-config	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-messaging-sdk	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-messaging-test-mediator	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-oid4vc-core	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-openid4vci	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-openid4vp	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-rate-limit	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-rdf-encoding	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-sd-jwt	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-secrets-resolver	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-siopv2	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-status-list	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-task-utils	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-tdk	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-tdk-common	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-trust-lists	`—`	indirect
crates.io	affinidi-vc	`—`	indirect
crates.io	agent-names	`—`	indirect
crates.io	ahash	`—`	indirect
crates.io	anyhow	`—`	indirect
crates.io	apple-native-keyring-store	`—`	indirect
crates.io	arbitrary	`—`	indirect
crates.io	arboard	`—`	indirect
crates.io	argon2	`—`	indirect
crates.io	async-convert	`—`	indirect
crates.io	async-trait	`—`	indirect
crates.io	aws-config	`—`	indirect
crates.io	aws-sdk-s3	`—`	indirect
crates.io	aws-sdk-secretsmanager	`—`	indirect
crates.io	aws-sdk-ssm	`—`	indirect
crates.io	axum	`—`	indirect
crates.io	axum-extra	`—`	indirect
crates.io	axum-server	`—`	indirect
crates.io	azure_core	`—`	indirect
crates.io	azure_identity	`—`	indirect
crates.io	azure_security_keyvault_secrets	`—`	indirect
crates.io	base58	`—`	indirect
crates.io	base64	`—`	indirect
crates.io	bech32	`—`	indirect
crates.io	blake2	`—`	indirect
crates.io	bls12_381_plus	`—`	indirect
crates.io	bs58	`—`	indirect
crates.io	cbc	`—`	indirect
crates.io	chacha20poly1305	`—`	indirect
crates.io	chrono	`—`	indirect
crates.io	ciborium	`—`	indirect
crates.io	ciborium-io	`—`	indirect
crates.io	circular-queue	`—`	indirect
crates.io	clap	`—`	indirect
crates.io	console	`—`	indirect
crates.io	coset	`—`	indirect
crates.io	criterion	`—`	indirect
crates.io	crossterm	`—`	indirect
crates.io	crypto_secretbox	`—`	indirect
crates.io	dashmap	`—`	indirect
crates.io	dbus-secret-service-keyring-store	`—`	indirect
crates.io	dialoguer	`—`	indirect
crates.io	did-ebsi	`—`	indirect
crates.io	did-example	`—`	indirect
crates.io	did-resolver-cheqd	`—`	indirect
crates.io	did-scid	`—`	indirect
crates.io	didwebvh-rs	`—`	indirect
crates.io	elliptic-curve	`—`	indirect
crates.io	ff	`—`	indirect
crates.io	fjall	`—`	indirect
crates.io	flate2	`—`	indirect
crates.io	futures-util	`—`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`—`	indirect
crates.io	google-cloud-gax	`—`	indirect
crates.io	google-cloud-secretmanager-v1	`—`	indirect
crates.io	governor	`—`	indirect
crates.io	group	`—`	indirect
crates.io	hex	`—`	indirect
crates.io	highway	`—`	indirect
crates.io	hkdf	`—`	indirect
crates.io	hmac	`—`	indirect
crates.io	hostname	`—`	indirect
crates.io	http	`—`	indirect
crates.io	humantime	`—`	indirect
crates.io	image	`—`	indirect
crates.io	itertools	`—`	indirect
crates.io	jsonwebtoken	`—`	indirect
crates.io	k256	`—`	indirect
crates.io	k8s-openapi	`—`	indirect
crates.io	keyring	`—`	indirect
crates.io	keyring-core	`—`	indirect
crates.io	kube	`—`	indirect
crates.io	lazy_static	`—`	indirect
crates.io	libfuzzer-sys	`—`	indirect
crates.io	log	`—`	indirect
crates.io	metrics	`—`	indirect
crates.io	metrics-exporter-prometheus	`—`	indirect
crates.io	ml-dsa	`—`	indirect
crates.io	moka	`—`	indirect
crates.io	multibase	`—`	indirect
crates.io	num-format	`—`	indirect
crates.io	p256	`—`	indirect
crates.io	p384	`—`	indirect
crates.io	p521	`—`	indirect
crates.io	percent-encoding	`—`	indirect
crates.io	qrcode	`—`	indirect
crates.io	quick-xml	`—`	indirect
crates.io	rand	`—`	indirect
crates.io	ratatui	`—`	indirect
crates.io	ratatui-image	`—`	indirect
crates.io	rayon	`—`	indirect
crates.io	rcgen	`—`	indirect
crates.io	redis	`—`	indirect
crates.io	regex	`—`	indirect
crates.io	reqwest	`—`	indirect
crates.io	ring	`—`	indirect
crates.io	rustls	`—`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-platform-verifier	`—`	indirect
crates.io	salsa20	`—`	indirect
crates.io	semver	`—`	indirect
crates.io	serde	`—`	indirect
crates.io	serde-wasm-bindgen	`—`	indirect
crates.io	serde_bytes	`—`	indirect
crates.io	serde_json_canonicalizer	`—`	indirect
crates.io	serial_test	`—`	indirect
crates.io	sha1	`—`	indirect
crates.io	sha2	`—`	indirect
crates.io	sha256	`—`	indirect
crates.io	sha3	`—`	indirect
crates.io	slh-dsa	`0.2.0-rc.5`	indirect
crates.io	ssi-dids-core	`—`	indirect
crates.io	subtle	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tempfile	`—`	indirect
crates.io	textwrap	`—`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tikv-jemallocator	`—`	indirect
crates.io	time	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tokio	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tokio-rustls	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tokio-stream	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tokio-tungstenite	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tokio-util	`—`	indirect
crates.io	toml	`—`	indirect
crates.io	toml_edit	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tower	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tower-http	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tracing	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tracing-subscriber	`—`	indirect
crates.io	trust-tasks-rs	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tui-input	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tui-logger	`—`	indirect
crates.io	unsigned-varint	`—`	indirect
crates.io	uuid	`—`	indirect
crates.io	vaultrs	`—`	indirect
crates.io	vta-sdk	`—`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen	`—`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-futures	`—`	indirect
crates.io	web-socket	`—`	indirect
crates.io	windows-native-keyring-store	`—`	indirect
crates.io	wiremock	`—`	indirect
crates.io	x509-parser	`—`	indirect
crates.io	zeroize	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 1 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 190 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records