Public record
Software health reportschema 0.23.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 19:04 UTC

agentmail-to / agentmail-mcp

TypeScript · JavaScript · PythonMIT★ 55 stars⑂ 15 forkssince Apr 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryMCP serverNetwork servicehow this is determined

agentmail-to/agentmail-mcp holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (73/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (45/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AgentMailOrganization
295 followers31 public repossince Dec 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIagentmail-mcp1.0.0-136 days ago
npmagentmail-mcp1.0.08,837276 days agoagentmailmcpstdiobridge

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

73Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence8/52 weeks with commits
14.2/18Commit volume37 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year37
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year8
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases1 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 7 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencecadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_taglegacy-local-v0.2.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release7
mean_days_between_releases
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
28.1/60Stars55 stars
9.6/25Forks15 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks15
stars55
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonbelow_threshold
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
52.6/80Monthly downloads8,837 downloads/month across npm, pypi
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesagentmail-mcp, agentmail-mcp
dependents
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
total_downloads
monthly_downloads8,837
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 59% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth5 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.593
How it's scored
8.4/42Issue resolution20% of issues closed
19.1/30PR acceptance7/11 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 3/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs7
open_issues8
closed_issues2
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.2
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
17.8/25Owner reach295 followers of agentmail-to
14.1/25Track record31 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers295
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginagentmail-to
public_repos31
account_age_days575
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on npm, pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 6 days ago
20/20Version history27 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesagentmail-mcp, agentmail-mcp
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish6

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

63Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
14/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests5 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.8/2.5CI-Tests5 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 3/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages142
unassessed_packages2
affected_by_severitymoderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 142 resolved dependencies against OSV. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

45Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
13.8/40Legible commit history14 of 54 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.259
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingpackages/npm-stdio-bridge/tsconfig.json, packages/server/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice5 of the last 54 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configspackages/npm-stdio-bridge/tsconfig.json, packages/server/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.093
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/15 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes44,492
source_files_sampled15
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

55GitHub stars
5contributors
37commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
8open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • deps.dev does not index pypi:agentmail-mcp@1.0.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 55 ★ / 15 ⇿
55Stars
15Forks
1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0102030405060551432025-052025-122026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 19:04 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
7CI-Tests5 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 3/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk1.29.0packages/npm-stdio-bridge/package.json
npm@clerk/express2.1.40packages/server/package.json
npm@clerk/mcp-tools0.3.1packages/server/package.json
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk1.29.0packages/server/package.json
npmagentmail0.5.14packages/server/package.json
npmagentmail-toolkit0.5.1packages/server/package.json
npmcors2.8.5packages/server/package.json
npmexpress5.2.1packages/server/package.json
npmjose5.9.6packages/server/package.json
npmzod4.4.3packages/server/package.json
PyPIhttpx==0.28.1python/stdio-bridge/pyproject.toml
PyPImcp==1.28.1python/stdio-bridge/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 144

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 132 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@clerk/express2.1.40direct
npm@clerk/mcp-tools0.3.1direct
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk1.29.0direct
npmagentmail0.5.14direct
npmagentmail-toolkit0.5.1direct
npmcors2.8.5direct
npmexpress5.2.1direct
npmjose5.9.6direct
npmjose6.2.3direct
npmzod4.4.3direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPImcp1.28.1direct
npm@cfworker/json-schema4.1.1indirect
npm@clerk/backend3.11.4indirect
npm@clerk/shared4.25.2indirect
npm@hono/node-server1.19.14indirect
npm@stablelib/base641.0.1indirect
npm@tanstack/query-core5.101.2indirect
npm@types/body-parser1.19.6indirect
npm@types/connect3.4.38indirect
npm@types/cors2.8.17indirect
npm@types/express5.0.6indirect
npm@types/express-serve-static-core5.1.1indirect
npm@types/http-errors2.0.5indirect
npm@types/node24.0.1indirect
npm@types/node24.13.3indirect
npm@types/node^24.13.3indirect
npm@types/qs6.15.1indirect
npm@types/range-parser1.2.7indirect
npm@types/send1.2.1indirect
npm@types/serve-static2.2.0indirect
npmaccepts2.0.0indirect
npmajv8.20.0indirect
npmajv-formats3.0.1indirect
npmbody-parser2.3.0indirect
npmbytes3.1.2indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcall-bound1.0.4indirect
npmcontent-disposition1.1.0indirect
npmcontent-type1.0.5indirect
npmcontent-type2.0.0indirect
npmcookie0.7.2indirect
npmcookie-signature1.2.2indirect
npmcore-util-is1.0.3indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdepd2.0.0indirect
npmdequal2.0.3indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmee-first1.1.1indirect
npmencodeurl2.0.0indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.2indirect
npmescape-html1.0.3indirect
npmetag1.8.1indirect
npmeventsource3.0.7indirect
npmeventsource-parser3.1.0indirect
npmexpress-rate-limit8.5.2indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-sha2561.3.0indirect
npmfast-uri3.1.3indirect
npmfinalhandler2.1.1indirect
npmforwarded0.2.0indirect
npmfresh2.0.0indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmglob-to-regexp0.4.1indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhasown2.0.4indirect
npmhono4.12.30indirect
npmhttp-errors2.0.1indirect
npmiconv-lite0.7.3indirect
npmimmediate3.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmip-address10.2.0indirect
npmipaddr.js1.9.1indirect
npmis-promise4.0.0indirect
npmisarray1.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-cookie3.0.7indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmjson-schema-typed8.0.2indirect
npmjszip3.10.1indirect
npmlie3.3.0indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmedia-typer1.1.0indirect
npmmerge-descriptors2.0.0indirect
npmmime-db1.54.0indirect
npmmime-types3.0.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnegotiator1.0.0indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmobject-inspect1.13.4indirect
npmon-finished2.4.1indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmpako1.0.11indirect
npmparseurl1.3.3indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-to-regexp8.4.2indirect
npmpkce-challenge5.0.1indirect
npmprocess-nextick-args2.0.1indirect
npmproxy-addr2.0.7indirect
npmqs6.15.3indirect
npmrange-parser1.3.0indirect
npmraw-body3.0.2indirect
npmreadable-stream2.3.8indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmrouter2.2.0indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.1.2indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsend1.2.1indirect
npmserve-static2.2.1indirect
npmsetimmediate1.0.5indirect
npmsetprototypeof1.2.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmside-channel1.1.1indirect
npmside-channel-list1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-map1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-weakmap1.0.2indirect
npmstandardwebhooks1.0.0indirect
npmstatuses2.0.2indirect
npmstring_decoder1.1.1indirect
npmtoidentifier1.0.1indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtype-is2.1.0indirect
npmtypescript5.8.3indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmtypescript^5.9.3indirect
npmundici-types7.18.2indirect
npmundici-types7.8.0indirect
npmunpdf1.6.2indirect
npmunpipe1.0.0indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmvary1.1.2indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmws8.21.0indirect
npmzod-to-json-schema3.25.2indirect
PyPIbuild1.5.1indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 142 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
@hono/node-server1.19.14indirectmoderate12.0.5

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.23.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI, npm.