Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-04 17:48 UTC

ai / nanoid

A tiny (118 bytes), secure, URL-friendly, unique string ID generator for JavaScript

JavaScriptMIT★ 26,915 stars⑂ 862 forkssince Aug 2017View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

ai/nanoid holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (86/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (37/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

Andrey SitnikPersonal account

10,102 followers102 public repossince Aug 2008@evilmartians

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	nanoid	6.0.1	921,727,956	131	1 day ago	id random url uuid

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

77Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
13.2/36	Commit cadence — 19/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 128 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	128
human_commit_share	0.99
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	19

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 33 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~5.1 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	33
latest_release_tag	6.0.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	1
mean_days_between_releases	5.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

81Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

97Exceptional

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 26,915 stars
24.5/25	Forks — 862 forks
12.2/15	Watchers — 157 watchers

Inputs used

forks	862
stars	26,915
watchers	157
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 921,727,956 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	nanoid
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	921,727,956
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

69Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

36Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 86% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	99
top_contributor_share	0.862

Issue & PR responsiveness

79Good

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
24.4/30	PR acceptance — 246/302 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	246
open_issues	0
closed_issues	264
prs_merged_7d	2
prs_decided_7d	2
prs_merged_30d	4
prs_decided_30d	4
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	56
first_time_authors_30d	2
first_time_prs_merged_30d	2
first_time_prs_decided_30d	2

Ownership & stewardship

75Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
25/25	Owner reach — 10,102 followers of ai
25/25	Track record — 102 public repos, account ~18 yr old

Inputs used

followers	10,102
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	ai
public_repos	102
account_age_days	6,576

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20	Version history — 131 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	nanoid
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

74Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

55Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://zelark.github.io/nano-id-cc/
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://zelark.github.io/nano-id-cc/
docs_site	https://zelark.github.io/nano-id-cc/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

34At Risk

Jurisdiction risk alert

High-risk jurisdiction exposure detected

1 contributor organization profilesRussia

Based on self-published public profile locations. This governance signal does not determine nationality, citizenship, intent, sanctions status, or individual trustworthiness.

How jurisdiction exposure is assessed

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
3/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 6
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	7.3
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap	34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier	75
security_posture_after_multiplier	55
security_posture_before_jurisdiction	73

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	204
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 204 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

37Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

11Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
10.8/40	Legible commit history — 20 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.202
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

50Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.01

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/21 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	9,559
source_files_sampled	21
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

26,915GitHub stars

99contributors

128commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

33releases

1bus factor

0open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
deps.dev does not index npm:nanoid@6.0.1; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 862 ⇿

0Stars

862Forks

31Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 2Minor 1Patch 28

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.3 / 10

7.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-04 17:47 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
10	Pinned-Dependencies	all dependencies are pinned
6	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 6
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
9	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 204

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 204 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@emnapi/core	`2.0.0-alpha.3`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/runtime	`2.0.0-alpha.3`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/wasi-threads	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/source-map	`0.3.11`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@logux/oxc-configs	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	@lukeed/csprng	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@lukeed/uuid	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/uuid	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/uuid-android-arm-eabi	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/uuid-android-arm64	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/uuid-darwin-arm64	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/uuid-darwin-x64	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/uuid-freebsd-x64	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/uuid-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/uuid-linux-arm64-gnu	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/uuid-linux-arm64-musl	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/uuid-linux-x64-gnu	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/uuid-linux-x64-musl	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/uuid-win32-arm64-msvc	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/uuid-win32-ia32-msvc	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/uuid-win32-x64-msvc	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-runtime	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	@oxc-project/types	`0.142.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint-tsgolint/darwin-arm64	`7.0.2001`	indirect
npm	@oxlint-tsgolint/darwin-x64	`7.0.2001`	indirect
npm	@oxlint-tsgolint/linux-arm64	`7.0.2001`	indirect
npm	@oxlint-tsgolint/linux-x64	`7.0.2001`	indirect
npm	@oxlint-tsgolint/win32-arm64	`7.0.2001`	indirect
npm	@oxlint-tsgolint/win32-x64	`7.0.2001`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-android-arm-eabi	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-android-arm64	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-darwin-arm64	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-darwin-x64	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-freebsd-x64	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-musleabihf	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-musl	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-gnu	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-musl	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-gnu	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-musl	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-openharmony-arm64	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-win32-ia32-msvc	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-win32-x64-msvc	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-android-arm64	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm64	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-x64	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x64	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm64	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/pluginutils	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@size-limit/file	`13.0.3`	indirect
npm	@size-limit/webpack	`13.0.3`	indirect
npm	@tybys/wasm-util	`0.10.3`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.9`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`26.1.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-darwin-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-arm	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-loong64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-sunos-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-win32-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-win32-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/ast	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/floating-point-hex-parser	`1.13.2`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/helper-api-error	`1.13.2`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/helper-buffer	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/helper-numbers	`1.13.2`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/helper-wasm-bytecode	`1.13.2`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/helper-wasm-section	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/ieee754	`1.13.2`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/leb128	`1.13.2`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/utf8	`1.13.2`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/wasm-edit	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/wasm-gen	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/wasm-opt	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/wasm-parser	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	@webassemblyjs/wast-printer	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	@xtuc/ieee754	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	@xtuc/long	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.18.0`	indirect
npm	actions-up	`1.16.0`	indirect
npm	ajv	`8.20.0`	indirect
npm	ajv-formats	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	ajv-keywords	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-colors	`4.1.3`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	baseline-browser-mapping	`2.11.10`	indirect
npm	better-node-test	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	browserslist	`4.28.7`	indirect
npm	buffer-from	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	bytes-iec	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	caniuse-lite	`1.0.30001806`	indirect
npm	chrome-trace-event	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	commander	`2.20.3`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	electron-to-chromium	`1.5.399`	indirect
npm	enhanced-resolve	`5.24.5`	indirect
npm	enquirer	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	es-module-lexer	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-prefer-let	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	events	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-uri	`3.1.5`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	jest-worker	`27.5.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-android-arm64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-arm64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-x64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-freebsd-x64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-musl	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lilconfig	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	merge-stream	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.54.0`	indirect
npm	minimizer-webpack-plugin	`5.6.1`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.16`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	nanospinner	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	neo-async	`2.6.2`	indirect
npm	node-releases	`2.0.51`	indirect
npm	nope-id	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	oxlint	`1.76.0`	indirect
npm	oxlint-tsgolint	`7.0.2001`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.25`	indirect
npm	random-bytes	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	require-from-string	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	requireindex	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	rndm	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	rolldown	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	schema-utils	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	secure-random-string	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.8.5`	indirect
npm	simple-git-hooks	`2.13.1`	indirect
npm	size-limit	`13.0.3`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-support	`0.5.21`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`8.1.1`	indirect
npm	tapable	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	terser	`5.49.0`	indirect
npm	tinybench	`6.1.2`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	typescript	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	uid	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	uid-safe	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`8.3.0`	indirect
npm	update-browserslist-db	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	uuid	`14.0.1`	indirect
npm	vite	`8.2.0`	indirect
npm	watchpack	`2.5.2`	indirect
npm	webpack	`5.109.2`	indirect
npm	webpack-sources	`3.5.1`	indirect
npm	yaml	`2.9.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 204 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records