Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-03 19:40 UTC

akkadotnet / Akka.Quartz.Actor

Quartz scheduling actor

C#Apache-2.0★ 59 stars⑂ 30 forkssince Mar 2016View on GitHub ↗

akkadotnet/Akka.Quartz.Actor holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (75/100) and lowest on Security (45/100). It was last updated today. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Akka.NETOrganization
199 followers41 public repossince Mar 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetAkka.Quartz.Actor1.5.59-17249 days agoakkastreamsquartz

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

59Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence — 4/52 weeks with commits
7.6/18Commit volume — 6 commits in the last year
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
commits_last_year6
human_commit_share0.37
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year4
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 9 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~314.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count9
latest_release_tag1.5.71-beta1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases314.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

70Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
28.6/60Stars — 59 stars
12.2/25Forks — 30 forks
5.8/15Watchers — 12 watchers
Inputs used
forks30
stars59
watchers12
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
60.1/80Total downloads — 602,143 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesAkka.Quartz.Actor
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads602,143
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 25% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 16 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled16
top_contributor_share0.25
How it's scored
37/42Issue resolution — 88% of issues closed
15.8/30PR acceptance — 186/353 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs186
open_issues2
closed_issues15
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.882
closed_unmerged_prs167
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
16.5/25Owner reach — 199 followers of akkadotnet
23.8/25Track record — 41 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers199
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginakkadotnet
public_repos41
account_age_days4,580
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 249 days ago
20/20Version history — 17 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesAkka.Quartz.Actor
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish249

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

51Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
4/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsakkadotnet, quartz, dotnet, job, scheduler
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

45Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0.5/2.5CI-Tests — 6 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 5/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
1.5/7.5Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate4.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
37.5/40Legible commit history — 26 of 37 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.703
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — examples/upgrade-walkthrough/LegacyApp/LegacyApp.csproj, examples/upgrade-walkthrough/NewApp/NewApp.csproj, migration/Quartz3Migration.Tests/Quartz3Migration.Tests.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 63 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifestsexamples/upgrade-walkthrough/LegacyApp/LegacyApp.csproj, examples/upgrade-walkthrough/NewApp/NewApp.csproj, migration/Quartz3Migration.Tests/Quartz3Migration.Tests.csproj, migration/Quartz3Migration/Quartz3Migration.csproj, src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.DatabaseTests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.DatabaseTests.csproj, src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests.csproj, src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Tests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Tests.csproj, src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Upgrade/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Upgrade.csproj, src/Akka.Quartz.Actor/Akka.Quartz.Actor.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.63
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/34 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes20,423
source_files_sampled34
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

59GitHub stars
16contributors
6commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
9releases
3bus factor
2open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 30 ⇿
0Stars
30Forks
8Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0510152025303022016-082021-082026-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 8

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10
4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-03 19:40 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
2CI-Tests6 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 5/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
2Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 36
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage—migration/Quartz3Migration.Tests/Quartz3Migration.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.TrxReport—migration/Quartz3Migration.Tests/Quartz3Migration.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.v3—migration/Quartz3Migration.Tests/Quartz3Migration.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClient—migration/Quartz3Migration/Quartz3Migration.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite—migration/Quartz3Migration/Quartz3Migration.csproj
NuGetNpgsql—migration/Quartz3Migration/Quartz3Migration.csproj
NuGetQuartz—migration/Quartz3Migration/Quartz3Migration.csproj
NuGetQuartz.Serialization.Json—migration/Quartz3Migration/Quartz3Migration.csproj
NuGetSystem.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters—migration/Quartz3Migration/Quartz3Migration.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.DatabaseTests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.DatabaseTests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.TrxReport—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.DatabaseTests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.DatabaseTests.csproj
NuGetTestcontainers.MsSql—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.DatabaseTests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.DatabaseTests.csproj
NuGetTestcontainers.PostgreSql—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.DatabaseTests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.DatabaseTests.csproj
NuGetxunit.v3—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.DatabaseTests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.DatabaseTests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.TrxReport—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetQuartz.Serialization.Newtonsoft—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetxunit.v3—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetAkka.TestKit.Xunit—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetEntityFramework—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Tests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Tests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.TrxReport—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Tests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Tests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.v3—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Tests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Tests.csproj
NuGetAkka.TestKit.Xunit—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Tests/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClient—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Upgrade/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Upgrade.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Upgrade/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Upgrade.csproj
NuGetNpgsql—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Upgrade/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Upgrade.csproj
NuGetQuartz—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Upgrade/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Upgrade.csproj
NuGetQuartz.Serialization.Newtonsoft—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Upgrade/Akka.Quartz.Actor.Upgrade.csproj
NuGetAkka—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor/Akka.Quartz.Actor.csproj
NuGetQuartz—src/Akka.Quartz.Actor/Akka.Quartz.Actor.csproj
All dependencies 18

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 17 direct and 1 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAkka—direct
NuGetAkka.TestKit.Xunit—direct
NuGetEntityFramework—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClient—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.TrxReport—direct
NuGetNpgsql—direct
NuGetQuartz—direct
NuGetQuartz.Serialization.Json—direct
NuGetQuartz.Serialization.Newtonsoft—direct
NuGetSystem.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters—direct
NuGetTestcontainers.MsSql—direct
NuGetTestcontainers.PostgreSql—direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—direct
NuGetxunit.v3—direct
NuGetAkka.Quartz.Actor—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.