Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-02 01:34 UTC

akkadotnet / akka.net

Canonical actor model implementation for .NET with local + distributed actors in C# and F#.

C#Custom license★ 5,087 stars⑂ 1,058 forkssince Dec 2013View on GitHub ↗

akkadotnet/akka.net holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (95/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (67/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 81 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Akka.NETOrganization
199 followers41 public repossince Mar 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
33.9/36Commit cadence — 49/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 503 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year503
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year49
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~19.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag1.6.0-beta1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases19.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

92Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 5,087 stars
25/25Forks — 1,058 forks
13.4/15Watchers — 254 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,058
stars5,087
watchers254
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

86Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges9
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesdev.azure.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 36% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 31 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.365
How it's scored
36.4/42Issue resolution — 87% of issues closed
25.6/30PR acceptance — 4,895/5,727 decided PRs merged
6.5/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs4,895
open_issues363
closed_issues2,348
prs_merged_7d39
prs_decided_7d60
prs_merged_30d39
prs_decided_30d60
issue_closed_ratio0.866
closed_unmerged_prs832
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
16.5/25Owner reach — 199 followers of akkadotnet
23.8/25Track record — 41 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers199
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginakkadotnet
public_repos41
account_age_days4,579

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — http://getakka.net
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsakka, actor-model, dotnet, concurrency, cluster, actor, reactive, distributed-programming, c-sharp, akkadotnet
has_wikiyes
homepagehttp://getakka.net
docs_sitehttp://getakka.net
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 31 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages39
unassessed_packages38
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 39 resolved dependencies against OSV. 38 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

81Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 96 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes8,209
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/aot/Akka.AOT.App/Akka.AOT.App.csproj, src/aot/Akka.Hosting.AOT.App/Akka.Hosting.AOT.App.csproj, src/benchmark/Akka.Benchmarks/Akka.Benchmarks.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/aot/Akka.AOT.App/Akka.AOT.App.csproj, src/aot/Akka.Hosting.AOT.App/Akka.Hosting.AOT.App.csproj, src/benchmark/Akka.Benchmarks/Akka.Benchmarks.csproj, src/benchmark/Akka.Cluster.Benchmarks/Akka.Cluster.Benchmarks.csproj, src/benchmark/Akka.Cluster.Cpu.Benchmark/Akka.Cluster.Cpu.Benchmark.csproj, src/benchmark/PingPong/PingPong.csproj, src/benchmark/RemotePingPong/RemotePingPong.csproj, src/benchmark/SerializationBenchmarks/SerializationBenchmarks.csproj, src/benchmark/SpawnBenchmark/SpawnBenchmark.csproj, src/contrib/cluster/Akka.Cluster.Metrics.Tests.MultiNode/Akka.Cluster.Metrics.Tests.MultiNode.csproj, src/contrib/cluster/Akka.Cluster.Metrics.Tests/Akka.Cluster.Metrics.Tests.csproj, src/contrib/cluster/Akka.Cluster.Metrics/Akka.Cluster.Metrics.csproj, src/contrib/cluster/Akka.Cluster.Sharding.Tests.MultiNode/Akka.Cluster.Sharding.Tests.MultiNode.csproj, src/contrib/cluster/Akka.Cluster.Sharding.Tests/Akka.Cluster.Sharding.Tests.csproj, src/contrib/cluster/Akka.Cluster.Sharding/Akka.Cluster.Sharding.csproj, src/contrib/cluster/Akka.Cluster.Tools.Tests.MultiNode/Akka.Cluster.Tools.Tests.MultiNode.csproj, src/contrib/cluster/Akka.Cluster.Tools.Tests/Akka.Cluster.Tools.Tests.csproj, src/contrib/cluster/Akka.Cluster.Tools/Akka.Cluster.Tools.csproj, src/contrib/cluster/Akka.DistributedData.LightningDB/Akka.DistributedData.LightningDB.csproj, src/contrib/cluster/Akka.DistributedData.Tests.MultiNode/Akka.DistributedData.Tests.MultiNode.csproj, src/contrib/cluster/Akka.DistributedData.Tests/Akka.DistributedData.Tests.csproj, src/contrib/cluster/Akka.DistributedData/Akka.DistributedData.csproj, src/contrib/dependencyinjection/Akka.DependencyInjection.Tests/Akka.DependencyInjection.Tests.csproj, src/contrib/dependencyinjection/Akka.DependencyInjection/Akka.DependencyInjection.csproj, src/contrib/hosting/Akka.Cluster.Hosting.Tests/Akka.Cluster.Hosting.Tests.csproj, src/contrib/hosting/Akka.Cluster.Hosting/Akka.Cluster.Hosting.csproj, src/contrib/hosting/Akka.Hosting.TestKit.Tests/Akka.Hosting.TestKit.Tests.csproj, src/contrib/hosting/Akka.Hosting.TestKit.Xunit2.Tests/Akka.Hosting.TestKit.Xunit2.Tests.csproj, src/contrib/hosting/Akka.Hosting.TestKit.Xunit2/Akka.Hosting.TestKit.Xunit2.csproj, src/contrib/hosting/Akka.Hosting.TestKit/Akka.Hosting.TestKit.csproj, src/contrib/hosting/Akka.Hosting.Tests/Akka.Hosting.Tests.csproj, src/contrib/hosting/Akka.Hosting/Akka.Hosting.csproj, src/contrib/hosting/Akka.Persistence.Hosting.Tests/Akka.Persistence.Hosting.Tests.csproj, src/contrib/hosting/Akka.Persistence.Hosting/Akka.Persistence.Hosting.csproj, src/contrib/hosting/Akka.Remote.Hosting.Tests/Akka.Remote.Hosting.Tests.csproj, src/contrib/hosting/Akka.Remote.Hosting/Akka.Remote.Hosting.csproj, src/contrib/persistence/Akka.Persistence.Query.InMemory.Tests/Akka.Persistence.Query.InMemory.Tests.csproj, src/contrib/persistence/Akka.Persistence.Query.InMemory/Akka.Persistence.Query.InMemory.csproj, src/contrib/serializers/Akka.Serialization.Hyperion.Tests/Akka.Serialization.Hyperion.Tests.csproj, src/contrib/serializers/Akka.Serialization.Hyperion/Akka.Serialization.Hyperion.csproj, src/contrib/serializers/Akka.Serialization.TestKit/Akka.Serialization.TestKit.csproj, src/contrib/testkits/Akka.TestKit.Xunit.Tests/Akka.TestKit.Xunit.Tests.csproj, src/contrib/testkits/Akka.TestKit.Xunit/Akka.TestKit.Xunit.csproj, src/contrib/testkits/Akka.TestKit.Xunit2.Tests/Akka.TestKit.Xunit2.Tests.csproj, src/contrib/testkits/Akka.TestKit.Xunit2/Akka.TestKit.Xunit2.csproj, src/core/Akka.API.Tests/Akka.API.Tests.csproj, src/core/Akka.Cluster.TestKit.Xunit2/Akka.Cluster.TestKit.Xunit2.csproj, src/core/Akka.Cluster.TestKit/Akka.Cluster.TestKit.csproj, src/core/Akka.Cluster.Tests.MultiNode/Akka.Cluster.Tests.MultiNode.csproj, src/core/Akka.Cluster.Tests.Performance/Akka.Cluster.Tests.Performance.csproj, src/core/Akka.Cluster.Tests/Akka.Cluster.Tests.csproj, src/core/Akka.Cluster/Akka.Cluster.csproj, src/core/Akka.Coordination.Tests/Akka.Coordination.Tests.csproj, src/core/Akka.Coordination/Akka.Coordination.csproj, src/core/Akka.Discovery.Tests/Akka.Discovery.Tests.csproj, src/core/Akka.Discovery/Akka.Discovery.csproj, src/core/Akka.Docs.Tests/Akka.Docs.Tests.csproj, src/core/Akka.Docs.Tutorials/Akka.Docs.Tutorials.csproj, src/core/Akka.MultiNode.RemoteHost/Akka.MultiNode.RemoteHost.csproj, src/core/Akka.MultiNode.SampleMultiNodeTests.Xunit2/Akka.MultiNode.SampleMultiNodeTests.Xunit2.csproj, src/core/Akka.MultiNode.SampleMultiNodeTests/Akka.MultiNode.SampleMultiNodeTests.csproj, src/core/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.Tests/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.Tests.csproj, src/core/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.Xunit2.Tests/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.Xunit2.Tests.csproj, src/core/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.Xunit2/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.Xunit2.csproj, src/core/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.csproj, src/core/Akka.Persistence.Query.Tests/Akka.Persistence.Query.Tests.csproj, src/core/Akka.Persistence.Query/Akka.Persistence.Query.csproj, src/core/Akka.Persistence.TCK.Tests/Akka.Persistence.TCK.Tests.csproj, src/core/Akka.Persistence.TCK.Xunit2/Akka.Persistence.TCK.Xunit2.csproj, src/core/Akka.Persistence.TCK/Akka.Persistence.TCK.csproj, src/core/Akka.Persistence.TestKit.Tests/Akka.Persistence.TestKit.Tests.csproj, src/core/Akka.Persistence.TestKit.Xunit/Akka.Persistence.TestKit.Xunit.csproj, src/core/Akka.Persistence.TestKit.Xunit2/Akka.Persistence.TestKit.Xunit2.csproj, src/core/Akka.Persistence.TestKit/Akka.Persistence.TestKit.csproj, src/core/Akka.Persistence.Tests/Akka.Persistence.Tests.csproj, src/core/Akka.Persistence/Akka.Persistence.csproj, src/core/Akka.Remote.TestKit.Tests/Akka.Remote.TestKit.Tests.csproj, src/core/Akka.Remote.TestKit.Xunit2/Akka.Remote.TestKit.Xunit2.csproj, src/core/Akka.Remote.TestKit/Akka.Remote.TestKit.csproj, src/core/Akka.Remote.Tests.MultiNode/Akka.Remote.Tests.MultiNode.csproj, src/core/Akka.Remote.Tests.Performance/Akka.Remote.Tests.Performance.csproj, src/core/Akka.Remote.Tests/Akka.Remote.Tests.csproj, src/core/Akka.Remote/Akka.Remote.csproj, src/core/Akka.Serialization.V2.Generators/Akka.Serialization.V2.Generators.csproj, src/core/Akka.Serialization.V2.Tests/Akka.Serialization.V2.Tests.csproj, src/core/Akka.Serialization.V2/Akka.Serialization.V2.csproj, src/core/Akka.Streams.TestKit.Tests/Akka.Streams.TestKit.Tests.csproj, src/core/Akka.Streams.TestKit/Akka.Streams.TestKit.csproj, src/core/Akka.Streams.Tests.Performance/Akka.Streams.Tests.Performance.csproj, src/core/Akka.Streams.Tests.TCK/Akka.Streams.Tests.TCK.csproj, src/core/Akka.Streams.Tests/Akka.Streams.Tests.csproj, src/core/Akka.Streams/Akka.Streams.csproj, src/core/Akka.TestKit.Tests/Akka.TestKit.Tests.csproj, src/core/Akka.TestKit/Akka.TestKit.csproj, src/core/Akka.Tests.Performance/Akka.Tests.Performance.csproj, src/core/Akka.Tests.Shared.Internals.Xunit3/Akka.Tests.Shared.Internals.Xunit3.csproj, src/core/Akka.Tests.Shared.Internals/Akka.Tests.Shared.Internals.csproj, src/core/Akka.Tests/Akka.Tests.csproj, src/core/Akka/Akka.csproj, src/examples/Akka.Persistence.Custom.Tests/Akka.Persistence.Custom.Tests.csproj, src/examples/Akka.Persistence.Custom/Akka.Persistence.Custom.csproj, src/examples/AppConfig/AppConfig.csproj, src/examples/AspNetCore/Akka.AspNetCore/Akka.AspNetCore.csproj, src/examples/AspNetCore/Samples.Akka.AspNetCore/Samples.Akka.AspNetCore.csproj, src/examples/Chat/ChatClient/ChatClient.csproj, src/examples/Chat/ChatMessages/ChatMessages.csproj, src/examples/Chat/ChatServer/ChatServer.csproj, src/examples/Cluster/ClusterSharding/ClusterSharding.Node/ClusterSharding.Node.csproj, src/examples/Cluster/ClusterSharding/ShoppingCart/ShoppingCart.csproj, src/examples/Cluster/ClusterTools/ClusterToolsExample.Node/ClusterToolsExample.Node.csproj, src/examples/Cluster/ClusterTools/ClusterToolsExample.Seed/ClusterToolsExample.Seed.csproj, src/examples/Cluster/ClusterTools/ClusterToolsExample.Shared/ClusterToolsExample.Shared.csproj, src/examples/Cluster/DData/DDataStressTest/DDataStressTest.csproj, src/examples/Cluster/Metrics/Samples.Cluster.AdaptiveGroup/Samples.Cluster.AdaptiveGroup.csproj, src/examples/Cluster/Metrics/Samples.Cluster.Metrics.Common/Samples.Cluster.Metrics.Common.csproj, src/examples/Cluster/Metrics/Samples.Cluster.Metrics/Samples.Cluster.Metrics.csproj, src/examples/Cluster/PublishSubscribe/SampleDestination/SampleDestination.csproj, src/examples/Cluster/PublishSubscribe/SamplePublishSubscribe/SampleSubscriber.csproj, src/examples/Cluster/PublishSubscribe/SamplePublisher/SamplePublisher.csproj, src/examples/Cluster/PublishSubscribe/SampleSender/SampleSender.csproj, src/examples/Cluster/Roles/Samples.Cluster.Transformation/Samples.Cluster.Transformation.csproj, src/examples/Cluster/Routing/Samples.Cluster.ConsistentHashRouting/Samples.Cluster.ConsistentHashRouting.csproj, src/examples/Cluster/Samples.Cluster.Simple/Samples.Cluster.Simple.csproj, src/examples/FaultTolerance/FaultTolerance.csproj, src/examples/HeadlessService/AkkaHeadlesssService/AkkaHeadlesssService.csproj, src/examples/HelloAkka/HelloWorld/HelloWorld.csproj, src/examples/HelloWorld/HelloAkka/HelloAkka.csproj, src/examples/Hosting/Akka.Hosting.Asp.LoggingDemo/Akka.Hosting.Asp.LoggingDemo.csproj, src/examples/Hosting/Akka.Hosting.LoggingDemo/Akka.Hosting.LoggingDemo.csproj, src/examples/Hosting/Akka.Hosting.SimpleDemo/Akka.Hosting.SimpleDemo.csproj, src/examples/PersistenceExample/PersistenceExample.csproj, src/examples/RemoteDeploy/Shared/Shared.csproj, src/examples/RemoteDeploy/System1/System1.csproj, src/examples/RemoteDeploy/System2/System2.csproj, src/examples/Routing/Routing.csproj, src/examples/Stocks/SymbolLookup/SymbolLookup.csproj, src/examples/Streams/StreamsExamples/StreamsExamples.csproj, src/examples/TcpEchoService.Server/TcpEchoService.Server.csproj, src/examples/Testing/Xunit2/Akka.Remote.TestKit.Xunit2.Tests/Akka.Remote.TestKit.Xunit2.Tests.csproj, src/examples/TimeServer/TimeClient/TimeClient.csproj, src/examples/TimeServer/TimeServer/TimeServer.csproj, src/examples/WindowsService/AkkaWindowsService/AkkaWindowsService.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.3/55Manageable file sizes — 34/2,736 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes191,498
source_files_sampled2,736
oversized_source_files34
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — src/benchmark/RemotePingPong/RealPayload/Protobuf/RealBenchmarkMessage.proto, src/contrib/cluster/Akka.Cluster.Metrics/Serialization/Proto/ClusterMetricsMessages.proto, src/protobuf/ClusterClientMessages.proto, src/protobuf/ClusterMessages.proto, src/protobuf/ClusterShardingMessages.proto, src/protobuf/ContainerFormats.proto, src/protobuf/DistributedPubSubMessages.proto, src/protobuf/Persistence.proto, src/protobuf/ReliableDelivery.proto, src/protobuf/ReplicatedDataMessages.proto, src/protobuf/ReplicatorMessages.proto, src/protobuf/StreamRefMessages.proto, src/protobuf/SystemMessageFormats.proto, src/protobuf/TestConductorProtocol.proto, src/protobuf/WireFormats.proto, src/protobuf/common/duration.proto
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples, sample
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, sample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filessrc/benchmark/RemotePingPong/RealPayload/Protobuf/RealBenchmarkMessage.proto, src/contrib/cluster/Akka.Cluster.Metrics/Serialization/Proto/ClusterMetricsMessages.proto, src/protobuf/ClusterClientMessages.proto, src/protobuf/ClusterMessages.proto, src/protobuf/ClusterShardingMessages.proto, src/protobuf/ContainerFormats.proto, src/protobuf/DistributedPubSubMessages.proto, src/protobuf/Persistence.proto, src/protobuf/ReliableDelivery.proto, src/protobuf/ReplicatedDataMessages.proto, src/protobuf/ReplicatorMessages.proto, src/protobuf/StreamRefMessages.proto, src/protobuf/SystemMessageFormats.proto, src/protobuf/TestConductorProtocol.proto, src/protobuf/WireFormats.proto, src/protobuf/common/duration.proto
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

5,087GitHub stars
98contributors
503commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
363open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,058 ⇿
0Stars
1,058Forks
99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

02004006008001,0001,2001,058142014-112020-102026-09
Major 0Minor 1Patch 79

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-02 01:33 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 31 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 77

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 77 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAkka.Analyzers—indirect
NuGetAkka.Bootstrap.Docker0.5.3indirect
NuGetAkka.Management1.5.50indirect
NuGetAkka.Persistence.Sql1.5.70indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet—indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8indirect
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1indirect
NuGetCsCheck—indirect
NuGetDotNetty.Handlers0.7.6indirect
NuGetFluentAssertions—indirect
NuGetFluentAssertions5.10.3indirect
NuGetFluentDateTime3.0.0indirect
NuGetFsCheck—indirect
NuGetFsCheck.Xunit—indirect
NuGetFsCheck.Xunit.v3—indirect
NuGetFSharp.Core—indirect
NuGetFSharp.Core4.1.17indirect
NuGetFSharp.Quotations.Evaluator2.1.0indirect
NuGetFsPickler5.3.2indirect
NuGetGoogle.Protobuf—indirect
NuGetGrpc.Tools—indirect
NuGetHelios2.1.2indirect
NuGetHyperion—indirect
NuGetLightningDB0.22.0indirect
NuGetMathNet.Numerics5.0.0indirect
NuGetMessagePack—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite10.0.9indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite8.0.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite.Core10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Abstractions—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.EnvironmentVariables—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.HealthChecks—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractions—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.WindowsServices—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.ObjectPool—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—indirect
NuGetNBench—indirect
NuGetNDesk.Options.Core1.2.8indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json—indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.1indirect
NuGetNito.AsyncEx.Context5.1.2indirect
NuGetNito.AsyncEx.Coordination5.1.2indirect
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter6.2.0indirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry—indirect
NuGetPublicApiGenerator11.5.4indirect
NuGetqdfeed1.1.0indirect
NuGetReactive.Streams1.0.2indirect
NuGetReactive.Streams1.0.4indirect
NuGetReactive.Streams.TCK1.0.4indirect
NuGetSwashbuckle.AspNetCore6.5.0indirect
NuGetSystem.CodeDom9.0.8indirect
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable1.3.1indirect
NuGetSystem.CommandLine2.0.9indirect
NuGetSystem.Configuration.ConfigurationManager—indirect
NuGetSystem.Linq.Async6.0.1indirect
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.3.0indirect
NuGetTeamCity.ServiceMessages3.0.13indirect
NuGetTeamCity.ServiceMessages4.1.1indirect
NuGetTmds.ExecFunction0.7.1indirect
NuGetUniverse.CpuUsage2.2.497.598indirect
NuGetVerify.DiffPlex—indirect
NuGetVerify.DiffPlex3.0.0indirect
NuGetVerify.Xunit25.0.2indirect
NuGetVerify.XunitV3—indirect
NuGetxunit—indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.utility—indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—indirect
NuGetxunit.v3—indirect
NuGetxunit.v3.assert—indirect
NuGetxunit.v3.extensibility.core—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 39 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 38 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.