Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 03:44 UTC

almogdepaz / wolfpack

Self-hosted browser terminal manager for AI coding agents. Control Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, and shell sessions from your phone or browser over Tailscale.

TypeScriptMIT★ 33 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Jan 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined
#ai-agents#claude#codex#developer-tools#pwa#self-hosted#tailscale#terminal#tmux#ai-coding#browser-terminal#claude-code#coding-agent#gemini#multi-agent#remote-development#remote-terminal#tailnet#terminal-dashboard#web-terminal

almogdepaz/wolfpack holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (83/100) and lowest on Security (44/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Almog De PazPersonal account
21 followers21 public repossince Jan 2017

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmwolfpack-bridge1.6.8764481 day agoai-agent-terminalai-agentsai-codingagent-orchestrationautonomous-agentsbrowser-terminalclaudeclaude-codecoding-agentcodexdeveloper-toolsgeminimulti-agentpwaremote-developmentremote-terminalself-hostedtailscaletailnetterminalterminal-dashboardweb-terminal

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

78Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence — 21/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 829 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year829
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year21

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 28 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~13.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count28
latest_release_tagv1.6.8
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases13.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

30At Risk
How it's scored
24.4/60Stars — 33 stars
5.8/25Forks — 6 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars33
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

48Weak
How it's scored
38.4/80Monthly downloads — 764 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageswolfpack-bridge
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads764
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

18Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 74% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.736

Issue & PR responsiveness

71Good
How it's scored
35.4/42Issue resolution — 84% of issues closed
26.8/30PR acceptance — 133/149 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs133
open_issues5
closed_issues27
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.844
closed_unmerged_prs16
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

52Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
9.7/25Owner reach — 21 followers of almogdepaz
21.8/25Track record — 21 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers21
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginalmogdepaz
public_repos21
account_age_days3,467
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history — 48 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageswolfpack-bridge
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

75Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 20 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-agents, claude, codex, developer-tools, pwa, self-hosted, tailscale, terminal, tmux, ai-coding, browser-terminal, claude-code, coding-agent, gemini, multi-agent, remote-development, remote-terminal, tailnet, terminal-dashboard, web-terminal
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

44Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
3.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

81Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes1,098
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

61Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — public/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configspublic/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
53.8/55Manageable file sizes — 5/232 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes1,012,494
source_files_sampled232
oversized_source_files5

Key facts

33GitHub stars
2contributors
829commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
28releases
1bus factor
5open issues
crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch crates package 'wolfpack-broker' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 03:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioserde1broker/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1broker/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror1broker/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1broker/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1broker/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1broker/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3broker/Cargo.toml
crates.ioportable-pty0.8broker/Cargo.toml
crates.iolibc0.2broker/Cargo.toml
crates.iovte0.13broker/Cargo.toml
crates.iounicode-width0.2.2broker/Cargo.toml
crates.iounicode-segmentation1.13.3broker/Cargo.toml
npmghostty-web0.4.0package.json
npmqrcode-terminal^0.12.0package.json
npmws^8.21.0package.json
All dependencies 120

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 105 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iolibc0.2.186direct
crates.ioportable-pty0.8.1direct
crates.ioserde1.0.228direct
crates.ioserde_json1.0.149direct
crates.iothiserror1.0.69direct
crates.iotokio1.52.1direct
crates.iotracing0.1.44direct
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3.23direct
crates.iounicode-segmentation1.13.3direct
crates.iounicode-width0.2.2direct
crates.iouuid1.23.1direct
crates.iovte0.13.1direct
npmghostty-web0.4.0direct
npmqrcode-terminal^0.12.0direct
npmws^8.21.0direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioanyhow1.0.102indirect
crates.ioarrayvec0.7.6indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.0indirect
crates.iobitflags1.3.2indirect
crates.iobitflags2.11.1indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.20.2indirect
crates.iobytes1.11.1indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iodowncast-rs1.2.1indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.iofastrand2.4.1indirect
crates.iofiledescriptor0.8.3indirect
crates.iofoldhash0.1.5indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.2indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.15.5indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.0indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.ioid-arena2.3.0indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.0indirect
crates.ioioctl-rs0.1.6indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.95indirect
crates.iolazy_static1.5.0indirect
crates.ioleb128fmt0.1.0indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.12.1indirect
crates.iolog0.4.29indirect
crates.iomatchers0.2.0indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.0indirect
crates.iomemoffset0.6.5indirect
crates.iomio1.2.0indirect
crates.ionix0.25.1indirect
crates.ionu-ansi-term0.50.3indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.iopin-utils0.1.0indirect
crates.ioprettyplease0.2.37indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.45indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.14indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.10indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.4indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.22indirect
crates.iosemver1.0.28indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserial0.4.0indirect
crates.ioserial-core0.4.0indirect
crates.ioserial-unix0.4.0indirect
crates.ioserial-windows0.4.0indirect
crates.iosharded-slab0.1.7indirect
crates.ioshared_library0.1.9indirect
crates.ioshell-words1.1.1indirect
crates.iosignal-hook-registry1.4.8indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.15.1indirect
crates.iosocket20.6.3indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.117indirect
crates.iotempfile3.27.0indirect
crates.iotermios0.2.2indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl1.0.69indirect
crates.iothread_local1.1.9indirect
crates.iotokio-macros2.7.0indirect
crates.iotracing-attributes0.1.31indirect
crates.iotracing-core0.1.36indirect
crates.iotracing-log0.2.0indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iounicode-xid0.2.6indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.2indirect
crates.iovaluable0.1.1indirect
crates.iovte_generate_state_changes0.1.2indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.3+wasi-0.2.9indirect
crates.iowasip30.4.0+wasi-0.3.0-rc-2026-01-06indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.118indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.118indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.118indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.118indirect
crates.iowasm-encoder0.244.0indirect
crates.iowasm-metadata0.244.0indirect
crates.iowasmparser0.244.0indirect
crates.iowinapi0.3.9indirect
crates.iowinapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowinreg0.10.1indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.57.1indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-core0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-rust0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-rust-macro0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-component0.244.0indirect
crates.iowit-parser0.244.0indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.21indirect
npm@playwright/test^1.58.2indirect
npm@types/ws^8.18.1indirect
npmbun-types^1.3.10indirect
npmplaywright^1.58.2indirect
npmtypescript^6.0.3indirect
npmwolfpack-bridge-darwin-arm641.6.7indirect
npmwolfpack-bridge-darwin-x641.6.7indirect
npmwolfpack-bridge-linux-arm641.6.7indirect
npmwolfpack-bridge-linux-x641.6.7indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with almogdepaz/wolfpack. Read them side by side →

98awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional96Kilo-Org/kilocodeKilo is the all-in-one agentic engineering platform. Build, ship, and iterate faster with the most popular open source coding agent.Exceptional93affaan-m/ECCThe agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.Exceptional94diegosouzapw/OmniRouteNever stop coding. Free MIT AI gateway: one endpoint, 290+ providers (90+ free), 500+ models — Kimi, Claude, GPT, OpenAI, Gemini, GLM, DeepSeek, MiniMax. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Cline & Copilot. Quota-aware auto-fallback, RTK+Caveman compression saves 15-95% tokens, MCP/A2A, Desktop/PWA. Built by 500+ contributorsExceptional94vstorm-co/pydantic-deepagentsOpen-source, self-hosted Claude Code - a terminal AI assistant and the Python framework behind it. Tool-calling, sandboxed execution, multi-agent teams, skills, checkpoints, unlimited context - on Pydantic AI, any model.Exceptional93yvgude/lean-ctxControl what your AI can see. LeanCTX (Lean Context) is the context intelligence layer for AI agents — one local Rust binary that decides what they read, remembers what they learn, guards what they touch, and proves what they save. 60–90% fewer tokens as the receipt. 76 MCP tools, 30+ agents, local-first.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.