Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 01:20 UTC

ambient-code / agentready

Repo Optimizer: Assess git repositories for AI-assisted development readiness. Submit your score!

PythonMIT★ 145 stars⑂ 60 forkssince Nov 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined
#ai-assisted-development#assessment-tool#code-quality#python

ambient-code/agentready holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (92/100) and lowest on Security (59/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

92
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ambient-codeOrganization
106 followers19 public repossince Sep 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIagentready2.50.04,522853 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

85Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
20.8/36Commit cadence — 30/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 641 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year641
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year30

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~5.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2.50.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

70Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

50Moderate
How it's scored
35/60Stars — 145 stars
14.8/25Forks — 60 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks60
stars145
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

65Good
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 28% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 36 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled36
top_contributor_share0.281

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good
How it's scored
33.3/42Issue resolution — 79% of issues closed
26.5/30PR acceptance — 284/322 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 10/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs284
open_issues39
closed_issues150
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.794
closed_unmerged_prs38
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

70Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
14.6/25Owner reach — 106 followers of ambient-code
11.2/25Track record — 19 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers106
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginambient-code
public_repos19
account_age_days312
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history — 85 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesagentready
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 12 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://ambient-code.github.io/agentready/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-assisted-development, assessment-tool, code-quality, python
has_wikino
homepagehttps://ambient-code.github.io/agentready/
docs_sitehttps://ambient-code.github.io/agentready/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

59Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-Review — Found 10/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,612
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

73Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock, uv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
54.3/55Manageable file sizes — 2/163 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes72,600
source_files_sampled163
oversized_source_files2

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — demos, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsdemos, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

145GitHub stars
36contributors
641commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
39open issues
PyPI, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 01:18 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 10/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 22
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsgithub-pages—docs/Gemfile
RubyGemsjekyll-seo-tag—docs/Gemfile
RubyGemsjekyll-sitemap—docs/Gemfile
RubyGemsjekyll-feed—docs/Gemfile
RubyGemswebrick—docs/Gemfile
RubyGemscsv—docs/Gemfile
RubyGemsbase64—docs/Gemfile
RubyGemsbigdecimal—docs/Gemfile
PyPIclick>=8.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIjinja2>=3.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0pyproject.toml
PyPIgitpython>=3.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIradon>=6.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIlizard>=1.17.0pyproject.toml
PyPIanthropic>=0.74.0pyproject.toml
PyPIjsonschema>=4.17.0pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>=2.31.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas>=2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIplotly>=5.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIscipy>=1.10.0pyproject.toml
PyPIPyGithub>=2.1.1pyproject.toml
All dependencies 171

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 24 direct and 147 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIanthropic0.40.0direct
PyPIanthropic0.74.1direct
PyPIclick8.3.1direct
PyPIgitpython3.1.50direct
PyPIjinja23.1.6direct
PyPIjsonschema4.25.1direct
PyPIlizard1.19.0direct
PyPIpandas2.3.3direct
PyPIplotly6.5.0direct
PyPIpydantic2.12.4direct
PyPIpygithub2.8.1direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.2direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIradon6.0.1direct
PyPIrequests2.33.0direct
PyPIscipy1.16.3direct
RubyGemsbase640.2.0direct
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.0.1direct
RubyGemscsv3.3.5direct
RubyGemsgithub-pages231direct
RubyGemsjekyll-feed0.17.0direct
RubyGemsjekyll-seo-tag2.8.0direct
RubyGemsjekyll-sitemap1.4.0direct
RubyGemswebrick1.9.2direct
PyPIagentready2.49.0indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.11.0indirect
PyPIattrs25.4.0indirect
PyPIblack26.3.1indirect
PyPIcertifi2025.11.12indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.4indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.12.0indirect
PyPIcryptography48.0.1indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.17.0indirect
PyPIflake87.3.0indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.12indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIisort7.0.0indirect
PyPIjiter0.12.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPImando0.7.1indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInarwhals2.13.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.3.5indirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIpathspec1.0.4indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.5.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpycodestyle2.14.0indirect
PyPIpycparser2.23indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpyflakes3.4.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.13.0indirect
PyPIpynacl1.6.2indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.0.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpytz2025.2indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.29.0indirect
PyPIruff0.14.6indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.2indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2025.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport6.1.7.10indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemscoffee-script2.4.1indirect
RubyGemscoffee-script-source1.12.2indirect
RubyGemscolorator1.1.0indirect
RubyGemscommonmarker0.23.12indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.7indirect
RubyGemsdnsruby1.73.1indirect
RubyGemsem-websocket0.5.3indirect
RubyGemsethon0.15.0indirect
RubyGemseventmachine1.2.7indirect
RubyGemsexecjs2.10.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday2.14.2indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-net_http3.4.2indirect
RubyGemsffi1.17.2indirect
RubyGemsforwardable-extended2.6.0indirect
RubyGemsgemoji4.1.0indirect
RubyGemsgithub-pages-health-check1.18.2indirect
RubyGemshtml-pipeline2.14.3indirect
RubyGemshtml-proofer4.4.3indirect
RubyGemshttp_parser.rb0.8.0indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.14.7indirect
RubyGemsjekyll3.9.5indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-avatar0.8.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-coffeescript1.2.2indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-commonmark1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-commonmark-ghpages0.4.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-default-layout0.1.5indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-gist1.5.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-github-metadata2.16.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-include-cache0.2.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-mentions1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-optional-front-matter0.3.2indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-paginate1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-readme-index0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-redirect-from0.16.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-relative-links0.6.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-remote-theme0.4.3indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-sass-converter1.5.2indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-swiss1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-architect0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-cayman0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-dinky0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-hacker0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-leap-day0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-merlot0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-midnight0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-minimal0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-modernist0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-primer0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-slate0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-tactile0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-time-machine0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-titles-from-headings0.5.3indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-watch2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsjemoji0.13.0indirect
RubyGemsjson2.19.5indirect
RubyGemskramdown2.4.0indirect
RubyGemskramdown-parser-gfm1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsliquid4.0.4indirect
RubyGemslisten3.9.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmercenary0.3.6indirect
RubyGemsmini_portile22.8.9indirect
RubyGemsminima2.5.1indirect
RubyGemsminitest5.25.4indirect
RubyGemsnet-http0.9.1indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.4indirect
RubyGemsoctokit4.25.1indirect
RubyGemsparallel1.24.0indirect
RubyGemspathutil0.16.2indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix5.1.1indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrb-fsevent0.11.2indirect
RubyGemsrb-inotify0.11.1indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsrouge3.30.0indirect
RubyGemsrubyzip2.4.1indirect
RubyGemssafe_yaml1.0.5indirect
RubyGemssass3.7.4indirect
RubyGemssass-listen4.0.0indirect
RubyGemssawyer0.9.3indirect
RubyGemssimpleidn0.2.3indirect
RubyGemsterminal-table1.8.0indirect
RubyGemstyphoeus1.5.0indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width1.8.0indirect
RubyGemsuri1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsyell2.2.2indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.6.18indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ambient-code/agentready. Read them side by side →

98pylint-dev/pylintIt's not just a linter that annoys you!Exceptional97wemake-services/wemake-python-styleguideThe strictest and most opinionated python linter ever!Exceptional98materialsproject/pymatgenPython Materials Genomics (pymatgen) is a robust materials analysis code that defines classes for structures and molecules with support for many electronic structure codes. It powers the Materials Project.Exceptional100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional100streamlit/streamlitStreamlit — A faster way to build and share data apps.Exceptional100scikit-learn/scikit-learnscikit-learn: machine learning in PythonExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.