Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 17:51 UTC

ambient-code / agentready

Repo Optimizer: Assess git repositories for AI-assisted development readiness. Submit your score!

PythonMIT★ 151 stars⑂ 65 forkssince Nov 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#ai-assisted-development#assessment-tool#code-quality#python

ambient-code/agentready holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Security (68/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 80 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ambient-codeOrganization
105 followers19 public repossince Sep 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIagentready2.52.32,498908 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

90Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
25.6/36Commit cadence — 37/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 672 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year672
human_commit_share0.8
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year37

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 8 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~10.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2.52.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release8
mean_days_between_releases10.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

70Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

50Moderate
How it's scored
35.3/60Stars — 151 stars
15.1/25Forks — 65 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks65
stars151
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

64Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 31% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 36 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled36
top_contributor_share0.308

Issue & PR responsiveness

83Excellent
How it's scored
38.9/42Issue resolution — 93% of issues closed
26.4/30PR acceptance — 305/346 decided PRs merged
9.8/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 3/4 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 8/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs305
open_issues14
closed_issues178
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d6
prs_decided_30d8
issue_closed_ratio0.927
closed_unmerged_prs41
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d3
first_time_prs_decided_30d4

Ownership & stewardship

56Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
14.6/25Owner reach — 105 followers of ambient-code
11.5/25Track record — 19 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers105
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginambient-code
public_repos19
account_age_days365

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 8 days ago
20/20Version history — 90 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesagentready
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish8

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 12 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.black], [tool.isort])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 21 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://ambient-code.github.io/agentready/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-assisted-development, assessment-tool, code-quality, python
has_wikino
homepagehttps://ambient-code.github.io/agentready/
docs_sitehttps://ambient-code.github.io/agentready/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

60Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 21 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 8/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages51
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:agentready@2.52.3 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 51 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

80Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 78 of 80 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.975
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,612

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

79Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.black], [tool.isort])
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 33 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 19 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock, uv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.33
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.19

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
54/55Manageable file sizes — 3/164 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes92,630
source_files_sampled164
oversized_source_files3

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — demos, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsdemos, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

151GitHub stars
36contributors
672commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
14open issues
PyPI, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 65 ⇿
0Stars
65Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325385063756542025-112026-042026-09
Major 0Minor 46Patch 54
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 17:51 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests21 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 8/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 14
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIclick>=8.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIjinja2>=3.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0pyproject.toml
PyPIgitpython>=3.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIradon>=6.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIlizard>=1.17.0pyproject.toml
PyPIanthropic>=0.74.0pyproject.toml
PyPIjsonschema>=4.17.0pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>=2.31.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas>=2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIplotly>=5.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIscipy>=1.10.0pyproject.toml
PyPIPyGithub>=2.1.1pyproject.toml
All dependencies 171

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 16 direct and 155 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIanthropic0.40.0direct
PyPIanthropic0.74.1direct
PyPIclick8.3.1direct
PyPIgitpython3.1.59direct
PyPIjinja23.1.6direct
PyPIjsonschema4.25.1direct
PyPIlizard1.19.0direct
PyPIpandas2.3.3direct
PyPIplotly6.5.0direct
PyPIpydantic2.12.4direct
PyPIpygithub2.8.1direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.2direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIradon6.0.1direct
PyPIrequests2.33.0direct
PyPIscipy1.16.3direct
PyPIagentready2.52.3indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.11.0indirect
PyPIattrs25.4.0indirect
PyPIblack26.3.1indirect
PyPIcertifi2025.11.12indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.4indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.12.0indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.17.0indirect
PyPIflake87.3.0indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.12indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIisort7.0.0indirect
PyPIjiter0.12.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPImando0.7.1indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInarwhals2.13.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.3.5indirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIpathspec1.0.4indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.5.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpycodestyle2.14.0indirect
PyPIpycparser2.23indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpyflakes3.4.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.13.0indirect
PyPIpynacl1.6.2indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.0.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpytz2025.2indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.29.0indirect
PyPIruff0.14.6indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.2indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2025.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport6.1.7.10indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsbase640.2.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.0.1indirect
RubyGemscoffee-script2.4.1indirect
RubyGemscoffee-script-source1.12.2indirect
RubyGemscolorator1.1.0indirect
RubyGemscommonmarker0.23.12indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.7indirect
RubyGemscsv3.3.5indirect
RubyGemsdnsruby1.73.1indirect
RubyGemsem-websocket0.5.3indirect
RubyGemsethon0.15.0indirect
RubyGemseventmachine1.2.7indirect
RubyGemsexecjs2.10.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday2.14.3indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-net_http3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsffi1.17.2indirect
RubyGemsforwardable-extended2.6.0indirect
RubyGemsgemoji4.1.0indirect
RubyGemsgithub-pages231indirect
RubyGemsgithub-pages-health-check1.18.2indirect
RubyGemshtml-pipeline2.14.3indirect
RubyGemshtml-proofer4.4.3indirect
RubyGemshttp_parser.rb0.8.0indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.14.7indirect
RubyGemsjekyll3.9.5indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-avatar0.8.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-coffeescript1.2.2indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-commonmark1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-commonmark-ghpages0.4.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-default-layout0.1.5indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-feed0.17.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-gist1.5.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-github-metadata2.16.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-include-cache0.2.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-mentions1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-optional-front-matter0.3.2indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-paginate1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-readme-index0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-redirect-from0.16.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-relative-links0.6.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-remote-theme0.4.3indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-sass-converter1.5.2indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-seo-tag2.8.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-sitemap1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-swiss1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-architect0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-cayman0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-dinky0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-hacker0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-leap-day0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-merlot0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-midnight0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-minimal0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-modernist0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-primer0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-slate0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-tactile0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-time-machine0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-titles-from-headings0.5.3indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-watch2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsjemoji0.13.0indirect
RubyGemsjson2.21.2indirect
RubyGemskramdown2.4.0indirect
RubyGemskramdown-parser-gfm1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsliquid4.0.4indirect
RubyGemslisten3.9.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmercenary0.3.6indirect
RubyGemsmini_portile22.8.9indirect
RubyGemsminima2.5.1indirect
RubyGemsminitest5.25.4indirect
RubyGemsnet-http0.9.1indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.4indirect
RubyGemsoctokit4.25.1indirect
RubyGemsparallel1.24.0indirect
RubyGemspathutil0.16.2indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix5.1.1indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrb-fsevent0.11.2indirect
RubyGemsrb-inotify0.11.1indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsrouge3.30.0indirect
RubyGemsrubyzip2.4.1indirect
RubyGemssafe_yaml1.0.5indirect
RubyGemssass3.7.4indirect
RubyGemssass-listen4.0.0indirect
RubyGemssawyer0.9.3indirect
RubyGemssimpleidn0.2.3indirect
RubyGemsterminal-table1.8.0indirect
RubyGemstyphoeus1.5.0indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width1.8.0indirect
RubyGemsuri1.1.1indirect
RubyGemswebrick1.9.2indirect
RubyGemsyell2.2.2indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.6.18indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:agentready@2.52.3 pulls in 51 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ambient-code/agentready. Read them side by side →

98pylint-dev/pylintIt's not just a linter that annoys you!Exceptional98materialsproject/pymatgenPython Materials Genomics (pymatgen) is a robust materials analysis code that defines classes for structures and molecules with support for many electronic structure codes. It powers the Materials Project.Exceptional100scikit-learn/scikit-learnscikit-learn: machine learning in PythonExceptional100open-telemetry/opentelemetry-pythonOpenTelemetry Python API and SDK Exceptional100apache/airflowApache Airflow - A platform to programmatically author, schedule, and monitor workflowsExceptional100huggingface/transformers🤗 Transformers: the model-definition framework for state-of-the-art machine learning models in text, vision, audio, and multimodal models, for both inference and training. Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.