Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 03:49 UTC

aminueza / terraform-provider-minio

Terraform provider for MinIO and S3-compatible storage (R2, B2, Hetzner, Spaces) — buckets, IAM, replication, lifecycle, encryption & more.

GoAGPL-3.0★ 335 stars⑂ 99 forkssince Dec 2019View on GitHub ↗

aminueza/terraform-provider-minio holds a health index of 97 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Security (95/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (74/100). It was last updated today. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

97
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

97
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 85 is calibrated to 97 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Amanda SouzaPersonal account
136 followers36 public repossince Oct 2015

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/aminueza/terraform-provider-minio/v3v3.38.4-733 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
22.8/36Commit cadence33/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume250 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year250
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year33

Release discipline

98Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~6.9 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv3.38.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases6.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

74Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
40.9/60Stars335 stars
16.6/25Forks99 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks99
stars335
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (AGPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

82Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 26% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth59 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled59
top_contributor_share0.257
How it's scored
40/42Issue resolution95% of issues closed
27.8/30PR acceptance719/776 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs719
open_issues12
closed_issues244
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.953
closed_unmerged_prs57
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
15.4/25Owner reach136 followers of aminueza
23.4/25Track record36 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers136
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginaminueza
public_repos36
account_age_days3,920
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history73 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/aminueza/terraform-provider-minio/v3
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://registry.terraform.io/providers/aminueza/minio
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics13 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsminio, s3, terraform-provider, hcl, backblaze-b2, cloudflare-r2, devops, golang, iam, infrastructure-as-code, object-storage, s3-compatible, terraform
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://registry.terraform.io/providers/aminueza/minio
docs_sitehttps://registry.terraform.io/providers/aminueza/minio
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

95Exceptional · 16% of overall

Security posture

95Exceptional
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
5/5Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
5/5SASTSAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate9.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

86Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes22,816
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapTaskfile.yml
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesTaskfile.yml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/235 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes58,544
source_files_sampled235
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

335GitHub stars
59contributors
250commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
3bus factor
12open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 9.5 / 10
9.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 03:48 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/awspolicyequivalencev1.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-ctyv1.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-logv0.10.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2v2.40.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/minio/madmin-go/v3v3.0.110go.mod
Gogithub.com/minio/minio-go/v7v7.2.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedirv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/rs/xidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0go.mod
Gogotest.tools/v3v3.5.2go.mod
All dependencies 91

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 79 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/awspolicyequivalencev1.7.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-ctyv1.5.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-logv0.10.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2v2.40.1direct
Gogithub.com/minio/madmin-go/v3v3.0.110direct
Gogithub.com/minio/minio-go/v7v7.2.1direct
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedirv1.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/rs/xidv1.6.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0direct
Gogotest.tools/v3v3.5.2direct
Gogithub.com/agext/levenshteinv1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/apparentlymart/go-textseg/v15v15.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.41.7indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudflare/circlv1.6.3indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.19.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-ole/go-olev1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4v4.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobufv1.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/grafana/regexpv0.0.0-20250905093917-f7b3be9d1853indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-checkpointv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttpv0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-hclogv1.6.3indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierrorv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-pluginv1.8.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-retryablehttpv0.7.8indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-uuidv1.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-versionv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hc-installv0.9.4indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2v2.24.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/logutilsv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-execv0.25.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-jsonv0.27.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-gov0.31.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-registry-addressv0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-svchostv0.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/yamuxv0.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.6indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/crc32v1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lufia/plan9statsv0.0.0-20260330125221-c963978e514eindirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.14indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.22indirect
Gogithub.com/matttproud/golang_protobuf_extensionsv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/minio/crc64nvmev1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/minio/md5-simdv1.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/copystructurev1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interfacev1.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-wordwrapv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructurev1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/reflectwalkv1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautonegv0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/oklog/runv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/philhofer/fwdv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/power-devops/perfstatv0.0.0-20240221224432-82ca36839d55indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_modelv0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/commonv0.67.5indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfsv0.20.1indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/prom2jsonv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/prometheusv0.311.3indirect
Gogithub.com/protonmail/go-cryptov1.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/safchain/ethtoolv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/secure-io/sio-gov0.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutil/v3v3.24.5indirect
Gogithub.com/shoenig/go-m1cpuv0.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/tinylib/msgpv1.6.4indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/go-sysconfv0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/numcpusv0.12.0indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/msgpackv4.0.4+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v5v5.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/tagparser/v2v2.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/yusufpapurcu/wmiv1.2.4indirect
Gogithub.com/zclconf/go-ctyv1.18.1indirect
Gogithub.com/zeebo/xxh3v1.1.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v2v2.4.4indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.4indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.53.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.37.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.56.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.46.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.39.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.47.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/appenginev1.6.8indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260519071638-aa98bba5eb94indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.81.1indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gogopkg.in/ini.v1v1.67.2indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.