Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-24 12:31 UTC

bridgecrewio / checkov

Prevent cloud misconfigurations and find vulnerabilities during build-time in infrastructure as code, container images and open source packages with Checkov by Bridgecrew.

Python · HCLApache-2.0★ 9,098 stars⑂ 1,448 forkssince Nov 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined
#terraform#static-analysis#aws#gcp#azure#aws-security#cloudformation#scans#compliance#kubernetes#infrastructure-as-code#devops#hacktoberfest

bridgecrewio/checkov holds a health index of 98 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (68/100). It was last updated today. 6 contributors account for most of its recent work.

98
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

98
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 86 is calibrated to 98 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

PANW AppSecOrganization
405 followers100 public repossince Mar 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIcheckov3.3.303,968,1903,7763 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

91Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
27/36Commit cadence — 39/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 228 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year228
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year39

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag3.3.30
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases3.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

95Exceptional · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

95Exceptional
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 9,098 stars
25/25Forks — 1,448 forks
10/15Watchers — 63 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,448
stars9,098
watchers63
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges9
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 3,968,190 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagescheckov
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,968,190
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

83Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

90Excellent
How it's scored
48.6/54Bus factor — 6 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 20% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor6
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.198

Issue & PR responsiveness

70Good
How it's scored
40.4/42Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed
25.4/30PR acceptance — 4,622/5,463 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/7 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 11/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs4,622
open_issues84
closed_issues2,066
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d4
prs_merged_30d13
prs_decided_30d23
issue_closed_ratio0.961
closed_unmerged_prs841
first_time_authors_30d6
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d7

Ownership & stewardship

74Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
18.8/25Owner reach — 405 followers of bridgecrewio
25/25Track record — 100 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers405
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginbridgecrewio
public_repos100
account_age_days2,792

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history — 3,776 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescheckov
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .flake8, pyproject.toml ([tool.black])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.checkov.io/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 13 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsterraform, static-analysis, aws, gcp, azure, aws-security, cloudformation, scans, compliance, kubernetes, infrastructure-as-code, devops, hacktoberfest
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.checkov.io/
docs_sitehttps://www.checkov.io/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

67Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0.5/2.5CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: InProgress
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 11/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 230 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate6.7

Dependency advisories

71Good
How it's scored
12.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: ecdsa 0.19.2 (high 7.4), asteval 1.0.6 (moderate 5.5)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
33.8/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,005 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories5
affected_packages2
assessed_packages95
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages2
Matched the pypi:checkov@3.3.30 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 95 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.prismacloud.io/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 93 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.prismacloud.io/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.939
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

83Excellent
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — tests/sca_package_2/examples/Microsoft.NET.Sdk.csproj, tests/sca_package_2/examples/go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .flake8, pyproject.toml ([tool.black])
11/11Static type checking — checkov/py.typed, mypy.ini, tests/common/sca/reachability/example_repo/tsconfig.json, tests/common/sca/reachability/nodejs/examples/tsconfig/tsconfig.json, tests/sast/source_code/js_filtered_build_ts/example1/tsconfig.json, tests/sast/source_code/js_filtered_build_ts/example2/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
6/10Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesPipfile.lock, go.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configscheckov/py.typed, mypy.ini, tests/common/sca/reachability/example_repo/tsconfig.json, tests/common/sca/reachability/nodejs/examples/tsconfig/tsconfig.json, tests/sast/source_code/js_filtered_build_ts/example1/tsconfig.json, tests/sast/source_code/js_filtered_build_ts/example2/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.03
toolchain_manifeststests/sca_package_2/examples/Microsoft.NET.Sdk.csproj, tests/sca_package_2/examples/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (checkov/py.typed, mypy.ini, tests/common/sca/reachability/example_repo/tsconfig.json, tests/common/sca/reachability/nodejs/examples/tsconfig/tsconfig.json, tests/sast/source_code/js_filtered_build_ts/example1/tsconfig.json, tests/sast/source_code/js_filtered_build_ts/example2/tsconfig.json)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 12/4,824 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes303,850
source_files_sampled4,824
oversized_source_files12

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — example, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

9,098GitHub stars
99contributors
228commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
6bus factor
84open issues
PyPI, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 15 authors (cap 12)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,448 ⇿
0Stars
1,448Forks
99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

05001,0001,5001,448152021-112024-042026-10
Major 0Minor 1Patch 98

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10
6.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-24 12:30 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
2CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: InProgress
3Code-ReviewFound 11/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 15 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities230 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 293

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 293 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/abbot/go-http-auth0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aryszka/jobqueue0.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/cenkalti/backoff2.2.1+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/cjoudrey/gluahttp0.0.0-20190104103309-101c19a37344indirect
Gogithub.com/cjoudrey/gluaurl0.0.0-20161028222611-31cbb9bef199indirect
Gogithub.com/codahale/hdrhistogram0.0.0-20161010025455-3a0bb77429bdindirect
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-oidc2.0.0+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/dgrijalva/jwt-go3.2.0+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/dimfeld/httppath0.0.0-20170720192232-ee938bf73598indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoop1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/ghodss/yaml1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-redis/redis/v88.3.3indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmp0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/memberlist0.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/instana/go-sensor1.4.16indirect
Gogithub.com/lightstep/lightstep-tracer-go0.24.1-0.20210318180546-a67254760a58indirect
Gogithub.com/looplab/fsm0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/miekg/dns1.1.41indirect
Gogithub.com/oklog/ulid1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/opentracing/basictracer-go1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/opentracing/opentracing-go1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errors0.8.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pquerna/cachecontrol0.0.0-20180517163645-1555304b9b35indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golang1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/rcrowley/go-metrics0.0.0-20181016184325-3113b8401b8aindirect
Gogithub.com/sanity-io/litter1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sarslanhan/cronmask0.0.0-20190709075623-766eca24d011indirect
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutil3.21.2+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrus1.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/sony/gobreaker0.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/szuecs/rate-limit-buffer0.7.1indirect
Gogithub.com/szuecs/routegroup-client0.17.7indirect
Gogithub.com/tidwall/gjson1.7.4indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/go-sysconf0.3.5indirect
Gogithub.com/uber-go/atomic1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/uber/jaeger-client-go2.16.0+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/uber/jaeger-lib2.0.0+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/yookoala/gofast0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/yuin/gopher-lua0.0.0-20200603152657-dc2b0ca8b37eindirect
Gogo.uber.org/atomic1.4.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.0.0-20200622213623-75b288015ac9indirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.0.0-20210415231046-e915ea6b2b7dindirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth20.0.0-20190604053449-0f29369cfe45indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sync0.0.0-20210220032951-036812b2e83cindirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.0.0-20210415045647-66c3f260301cindirect
Gogolang.org/x/tools0.1.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpc1.22.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/alecthomas/kingpin.v22.2.6indirect
Gogopkg.in/square/go-jose.v22.3.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v22.4.0indirect
Gok8s.io/api0.18.6indirect
Gok8s.io/apimachinery0.18.6indirect
Golayeh.com/gopher-json0.0.0-20190114024228-97fed8db8427indirect
npmbytes0.1.0indirect
npmcommander0.6.1indirect
npmconnect2.6.0indirect
npmcookie0.0.4indirect
npmcrc0.2.0indirect
npmdebug4.3.3indirect
npmexpress3.0.0indirect
npmformidable1.0.11indirect
npmfresh0.1.0indirect
npmlodash3.1.0indirect
npmmethods0.0.1indirect
npmmime1.2.6indirect
npmmkdirp0.3.3indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmpause0.0.1indirect
npmqs0.5.1indirect
npmrange-parser0.0.4indirect
npmsend0.0.4indirect
npmsend0.1.0indirect
NuGetAWSSDK.S33.7.101.28indirect
NuGetDSInternals.Common4.7.0indirect
NuGetEnumStringValues4.0.0indirect
NuGetjQuery3.0.0indirect
NuGetlog4net2.0.9indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.1indirect
NuGetSendGrid9.28.1indirect
NuGetTinyMCE6.3.0indirect
PyPIaiodns—indirect
PyPIaiodns3.6.1indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.1indirect
PyPIaiohttp—indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.13.5indirect
PyPIaiomultiprocess—indirect
PyPIaiomultiprocess0.9.1indirect
PyPIaioresponses0.7.8indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIargcomplete—indirect
PyPIargcomplete3.6.3indirect
PyPIasteval1.0.6indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbandit1.8.6indirect
PyPIbc-detect-secrets1.5.47indirect
PyPIbc-detect-secrets1.5.52indirect
PyPIbc-jsonpath-ng1.6.1indirect
PyPIbc-python-hcl20.4.3indirect
PyPIbeartype0.22.2indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.14.3indirect
PyPIboolean-py5.0indirect
PyPIboto31.35.49indirect
PyPIboto3-stubs-lite1.43.18indirect
PyPIbotocore1.35.99indirect
PyPIbotocore-stubs1.43.14indirect
PyPIcached-property2.0.1indirect
PyPIcachetools—indirect
PyPIcachetools5.5.2indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.5.20indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.4.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer—indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIcheckov3.2.531indirect
PyPIcheckov3.3.30indirect
PyPIclick—indirect
PyPIclick8.1.8indirect
PyPIclick-option-group0.5.9indirect
PyPIcloudsplaining—indirect
PyPIcloudsplaining0.7.0indirect
PyPIcolorama—indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIconfigargparse—indirect
PyPIconfigargparse1.7.5indirect
PyPIcontextlib221.6.0indirect
PyPIcoverage7.6.1indirect
PyPIcoverage-badge1.1.2indirect
PyPIcyclonedx-python-lib—indirect
PyPIcyclonedx-python-lib7.6.2indirect
PyPIdecorator5.3.1indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIdjango1.2indirect
PyPIdlint0.16.0indirect
PyPIdocker—indirect
PyPIdocker7.1.0indirect
PyPIdockerfile-parse—indirect
PyPIdockerfile-parse2.0.1indirect
PyPIdpath2.1.3indirect
PyPIecdsa—indirect
PyPIecdsa0.19.2indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIfilelock3.19.1indirect
PyPIflake87.3.0indirect
PyPIflake8-bugbear24.12.12indirect
PyPIflask0.6indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.12indirect
PyPIgitpython—indirect
PyPIgitpython3.1.41indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.15indirect
PyPIidna3.17indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata—indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata7.2.1indirect
PyPIimportlib-resources6.5.2indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.1.0indirect
PyPIisodate0.7.2indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjmespath—indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema—indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.25.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIjunit-xml—indirect
PyPIjunit-xml1.9indirect
PyPIlark1.3.1indirect
PyPIlibrt0.11.0indirect
PyPIlicense-expression—indirect
PyPIlicense-expression30.4.4indirect
PyPImarkdown3.9indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py3.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPImypy1.19.1indirect
PyPImypy-boto3-s31.43.14indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInetworkx—indirect
PyPInetworkx2.6.3indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.0.2indirect
PyPIorjson3.11.5indirect
PyPIpackageurl-python—indirect
PyPIpackageurl-python0.13.4indirect
PyPIpackaging—indirect
PyPIpackaging23.2indirect
PyPIparameterized0.9.0indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs—indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.4.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIply3.11indirect
PyPIpolicy-sentry0.13.2indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.3.0indirect
PyPIprettytable—indirect
PyPIprettytable3.16.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.4.1indirect
PyPIpy1.11.0indirect
PyPIpy-cpuinfo9.0.0indirect
PyPIpy-serializable1.1.2indirect
PyPIpycares4.11.0indirect
PyPIpycep-parser0.5.1indirect
PyPIpycodestyle2.14.0indirect
PyPIpycparser2.23indirect
PyPIpydantic—indirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpyflakes3.4.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpyston2.3.5indirect
PyPIpyston-autoload2.3.5indirect
PyPIpytest7.4.4indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio0.23.8indirect
PyPIpytest-benchmark5.0.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov6.3.0indirect
PyPIpytest-forked1.6.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.15.1indirect
PyPIpytest-timeout2.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.4.0indirect
PyPIpyyaml—indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIrdflib7.6.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.36.2indirect
PyPIregex2026.1.15indirect
PyPIrequests—indirect
PyPIrequests2.26.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.32.5indirect
PyPIresponses0.26.1indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.27.1indirect
PyPIrustworkx—indirect
PyPIrustworkx0.17.1indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.10.4indirect
PyPIschema—indirect
PyPIschema0.7.5indirect
PyPIsemantic-version2.10.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools78.1.1indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.3indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.8.4indirect
PyPIspdx-tools—indirect
PyPIspdx-tools0.8.3indirect
PyPIstevedore5.5.0indirect
PyPItabulate—indirect
PyPItabulate0.9.0indirect
PyPItermcolor—indirect
PyPItermcolor2.3.0indirect
PyPItime-machine2.19.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItqdm—indirect
PyPItqdm4.67.3indirect
PyPItypes-awscrt0.33.0indirect
PyPItypes-cachetools5.5.0.20240820indirect
PyPItypes-colorama0.4.15.20250801indirect
PyPItypes-jmespath1.1.0.20260124indirect
PyPItypes-jsonschema4.26.0.20260202indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20250915indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.32.4.20260107indirect
PyPItypes-s3transfer0.16.0indirect
PyPItypes-tabulate0.9.0.20241207indirect
PyPItypes-tqdm4.67.3.20260205indirect
PyPItypes-urllib31.26.25.14indirect
PyPItyping-extensions—indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIunidiff0.7.5indirect
PyPIuritools5.0.0indirect
PyPIurllib3—indirect
PyPIurllib31.26.20indirect
PyPIurllib3-mock0.3.3indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.4.2indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.7.0indirect
PyPIxmltodict1.0.4indirect
PyPIyarl—indirect
PyPIyarl1.22.0indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.1indirect
RubyGemsgithub-pages—indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-feed—indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-get-json—indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-redirect-from—indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-remote-theme—indirect
RubyGemstzinfo—indirect
RubyGemstzinfo-data—indirect
RubyGemswdm—indirect
Dependency advisories 2

Installing pypi:checkov@3.3.30 pulls in 95 packages, direct and transitive: 2 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
ecdsa0.19.2directhigh2—
asteval1.0.6directmoderate31.0.9

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with bridgecrewio/checkov. Read them side by side →

98cloud-custodian/cloud-custodianRules engine for cloud security, cost optimization, and governance, DSL in yaml for policies to query, filter, and take actions on resourcesExceptional98pulumi/pulumiPulumi - Infrastructure as Code in any programming language 🚀Exceptional98Netflix/metaflowBuild, Manage and Deploy AI/ML SystemsExceptional98databricks/terraform-provider-databricksDatabricks Terraform ProviderExceptional99argoproj/argo-cdDeclarative Continuous Deployment for KubernetesExceptional99aquasecurity/trivyFind vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, secrets, SBOM in containers, Kubernetes, code repositories, clouds and moreExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.