Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-19 02:08 UTC

ankit-chaubey / Archivum

Deterministic TAR-based backups with per-file SHA-256, Blake3-sealed index, split archives, and incremental updates

RustApache-2.0★ 13 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Feb 2026View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

ankit-chaubey/Archivum holds a health index of 53 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (58/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (39/100). It was last updated 71 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 52 is calibrated to 53 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Ankit ChaubeyPersonal account

18 followers23 public repossince Sep 2020Ankit Chaubey

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
crates.io	archivum	0.3.0	11	3	71 days ago	archive backup forensics restore tar command-line-utilities compression filesystem

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

56Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

38Weak

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 71 days ago
2.8/36	Commit cadence — 4/52 weeks with commits
12.1/18	Commit volume — 21 commits in the last year
5/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

commits_last_year	21
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	71
active_weeks_last_year	4

Release discipline

83Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 3 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 71 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~53.9 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	3
latest_release_tag	v0.3.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	71
mean_days_between_releases	53.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

39Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

18Critical

How it's scored

17.5/60	Stars — 13 stars
0/25	Forks — 2 forks
0/15	Watchers — 0 watchers

Inputs used

forks	2
stars	13
watchers	0
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

77Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	5
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

18Critical

How it's scored

14.4/80	Monthly downloads — 11 downloads/month across crates
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	archivum
dependents	—
ecosystems	crates
total_downloads	70
monthly_downloads	11
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	1
top_contributor_share	1

Issue & PR responsiveness

74Good

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
0/30	PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	0
open_issues	0
closed_issues	1
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	0
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

52Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
9.2/25	Owner reach — 18 followers of ankit-chaubey
22/25	Track record — 23 public repos, account ~5 yr old

Inputs used

followers	18
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	ankit-chaubey
public_repos	23
account_age_days	2,174

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

92Excellent

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 71 days ago
12/20	Version history — 3 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	archivum
ecosystems	crates
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	71

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

30At Risk

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://crates.io/crates/archivum
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 4 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	archive, backup, compression, tar
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://crates.io/crates/archivum
docs_site	https://crates.io/crates/archivum
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

43Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
3.8/7.5	Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	4.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

89Excellent

How it's scored

26.6/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: anyhow 1.0.102 (unknown)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	3
affected_packages	3
assessed_packages	163
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	unknown 3
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 163 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

25At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
25.4/40	Legible commit history — 10 of 21 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.476
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

34At Risk

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 21
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	Cargo.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/21 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	21,462
source_files_sampled	21
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

13GitHub stars

1contributors

21commits, last 12 months

71days since last push

3releases

1bus factor

0open issues

crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿

0Stars

2Forks

1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 1Patch 0

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10

4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-19 02:08 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
5	Maintained	6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 23

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	clap	`4.5`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	clap_complete	`4.5`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	tar	`0.4.46`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	walkdir	`2.5`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde	`1.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	sha2	`0.10`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	hex	`0.4`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	indicatif	`0.17`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	colored	`2.1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	flate2	`1.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	zstd	`0.13`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	bzip2	`0.4`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	lz4_flex	`0.11`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	globset	`0.4`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	humansize	`2.1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	chrono	`0.4`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	blake3	`>=1.5, <1.8`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	rayon	`1.10`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	dirs	`5.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	toml	`0.8`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	regex	`1.10`	Cargo.toml

All dependencies 163

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 23 direct and 140 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.102`	direct
crates.io	blake3	`1.7.0`	direct
crates.io	bzip2	`0.4.4`	direct
crates.io	chrono	`0.4.45`	direct
crates.io	clap	`4.6.1`	direct
crates.io	clap_complete	`4.6.5`	direct
crates.io	colored	`2.2.0`	direct
crates.io	dirs	`5.0.1`	direct
crates.io	flate2	`1.1.9`	direct
crates.io	globset	`0.4.18`	direct
crates.io	hex	`0.4.3`	direct
crates.io	humansize	`2.1.3`	direct
crates.io	indicatif	`0.17.11`	direct
crates.io	lz4_flex	`0.11.6`	direct
crates.io	rayon	`1.12.0`	direct
crates.io	regex	`1.12.3`	direct
crates.io	serde	`1.0.228`	direct
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.150`	direct
crates.io	sha2	`0.10.9`	direct
crates.io	tar	`0.4.46`	direct
crates.io	toml	`0.8.23`	direct
crates.io	walkdir	`2.5.0`	direct
crates.io	zstd	`0.13.3`	direct
crates.io	adler2	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	android_system_properties	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	anstream	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle	`1.0.14`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-parse	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-query	`1.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-wincon	`3.0.11`	indirect
crates.io	arrayref	`0.3.9`	indirect
crates.io	arrayvec	`0.7.6`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	block-buffer	`0.10.4`	indirect
crates.io	bstr	`1.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	bumpalo	`3.20.3`	indirect
crates.io	bzip2-sys	`0.1.13+1.0.8`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.2.63`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	clap_builder	`4.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	clap_derive	`4.6.1`	indirect
crates.io	clap_lex	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	colorchoice	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	console	`0.15.11`	indirect
crates.io	constant_time_eq	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation-sys	`0.8.7`	indirect
crates.io	cpufeatures	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	crc32fast	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-deque	`0.8.6`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.18`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-utils	`0.8.21`	indirect
crates.io	crypto-common	`0.1.7`	indirect
crates.io	digest	`0.10.7`	indirect
crates.io	dirs-sys	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	either	`1.16.0`	indirect
crates.io	encode_unicode	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	equivalent	`1.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	errno	`0.3.14`	indirect
crates.io	filetime	`0.2.29`	indirect
crates.io	find-msvc-tools	`0.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	futures-core	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	futures-task	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	futures-util	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	generic-array	`0.14.7`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.3.4`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.17.1`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	iana-time-zone	`0.1.65`	indirect
crates.io	iana-time-zone-haiku	`0.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	indexmap	`2.14.0`	indirect
crates.io	is_terminal_polyfill	`1.70.2`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	jobserver	`0.1.34`	indirect
crates.io	js-sys	`0.3.100`	indirect
crates.io	lazy_static	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.186`	indirect
crates.io	libm	`0.2.16`	indirect
crates.io	libredox	`0.1.17`	indirect
crates.io	linux-raw-sys	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	log	`0.4.32`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	miniz_oxide	`0.8.9`	indirect
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.19`	indirect
crates.io	number_prefix	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.4`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell_polyfill	`1.70.2`	indirect
crates.io	option-ext	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	pin-project-lite	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	pkg-config	`0.3.33`	indirect
crates.io	portable-atomic	`1.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.106`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.45`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`5.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	rayon-core	`1.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	redox_users	`0.4.6`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.14`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.10`	indirect
crates.io	rustix	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	rustversion	`1.0.22`	indirect
crates.io	same-file	`1.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_spanned	`0.6.9`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	simd-adler32	`0.3.9`	indirect
crates.io	slab	`0.4.12`	indirect
crates.io	strsim	`0.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.117`	indirect
crates.io	terminal_size	`0.4.4`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`1.0.69`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`1.0.69`	indirect
crates.io	toml_datetime	`0.6.11`	indirect
crates.io	toml_edit	`0.22.27`	indirect
crates.io	toml_write	`0.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	twox-hash	`2.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	typenum	`1.20.1`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.24`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-width	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	utf8parse	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	version_check	`0.9.5`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	wasip2	`1.0.3+wasi-0.2.9`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen	`0.2.123`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro	`0.2.123`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro-support	`0.2.123`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-shared	`0.2.123`	indirect
crates.io	web-time	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-util	`0.1.11`	indirect
crates.io	windows-core	`0.62.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-implement	`0.60.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-interface	`0.59.3`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-result	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-strings	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.48.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.59.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.61.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	winnow	`0.7.15`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen	`0.57.1`	indirect
crates.io	xattr	`1.6.1`	indirect
crates.io	zmij	`1.0.21`	indirect
crates.io	zstd-safe	`7.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	zstd-sys	`2.0.16+zstd.1.5.7`	indirect

Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 163 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
anyhow	`1.0.102`	direct	unknown	1	`1.0.103`
crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.18`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.9.20`
number_prefix	`0.4.0`	indirect	unknown	1	—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records