Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 18:10 UTC

ansible / ansible-lint

ansible-lint checks playbooks for practices and behavior that could potentially be improved and can fix some of the most common ones for you

PythonGPL-3.0★ 3,902 stars⑂ 752 forkssince Aug 2013View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

#ansible #ansible-lint #pre-commit-hook #hacktoberfest #dot-config #pep-621 #ansible-dev-tools

ansible/ansible-lint holds a health index of 98 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (75/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 87 is calibrated to 98 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AnsibleOrganization · verified domain

3,744 followers304 public repossince Mar 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	ansible-lint	26.8.0	5,316,483	270	15 days ago	ansible lint

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

94Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
30.5/36	Commit cadence — 44/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 245 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	245
human_commit_share	0.71
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	44

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 15 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~28.1 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v26.8.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	15
mean_days_between_releases	28.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

94Exceptional · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

92Excellent

How it's scored

58.3/60	Stars — 3,902 stars
24/25	Forks — 752 forks
9.7/15	Watchers — 56 watchers

Inputs used

forks	752
stars	3,902
watchers	56
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

93Exceptional

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
7.2/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	yes
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 5,316,483 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	ansible-lint
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	5,316,483
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

79Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

43Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.8/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 52% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 97 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 77 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	97
top_contributor_share	0.52

Issue & PR responsiveness

86Excellent

How it's scored

39.3/42	Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
25.2/30	PR acceptance — 2,630/3,129 decided PRs merged
6.5/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 6/12 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	2,630
open_issues	101
closed_issues	1,444
prs_merged_7d	5
prs_decided_7d	8
prs_merged_30d	19
prs_decided_30d	29
issue_closed_ratio	0.935
closed_unmerged_prs	499
first_time_authors_30d	9
first_time_prs_merged_30d	6
first_time_prs_decided_30d	12

Ownership & stewardship

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 3,744 followers of ansible
25/25	Track record — 304 public repos, account ~14 yr old

Inputs used

followers	3,744
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	ansible
public_repos	304
account_age_days	5,287

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 15 days ago
20/20	Version history — 270 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	ansible-lint
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	15

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — biome.json, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://ansible.readthedocs.io/projects/lint/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 7 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	ansible, ansible-lint, pre-commit-hook, hacktoberfest, dot-config, pep-621, ansible-dev-tools
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://ansible.readthedocs.io/projects/lint/
docs_site	https://ansible.readthedocs.io/projects/lint/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

76Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

70Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
1.2/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: Passing
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 77 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5	SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 9 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	28
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:ansible-lint@26.8.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 28 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 71 of 71 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

90Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — examples/Taskfile.yml, mise.toml
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — biome.json, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11	Static type checking — collections/ansible_collections/local/testcollection/plugins/module_utils/py.typed, src/ansiblelint/py.typed, test/schemas/tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 9 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 28 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	examples/Taskfile.yml, mise.toml
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	collections/ansible_collections/local/testcollection/plugins/module_utils/py.typed, src/ansiblelint/py.typed, test/schemas/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0.09
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.28

Code legibility for models

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (collections/ansible_collections/local/testcollection/plugins/module_utils/py.typed, src/ansiblelint/py.typed, test/schemas/tsconfig.json)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/185 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	58,351
source_files_sampled	185
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

3,902GitHub stars

97contributors

245commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

101open issues

npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 15 authors (cap 12)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 752 ⇿

0Stars

752Forks

100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 45Patch 55

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.0 / 10

7.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 18:09 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
5	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
5	CII-Best-Practices	badge detected: Passing
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
10	Contributors	project has 77 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10	SAST	SAST tool is run on all commits
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
1	Vulnerabilities	9 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 18

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	ansible-compat	`>=26.3.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	ansible-core	`>=2.16.19,!=2.17.*`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	black	`>=25.2.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	cffi	`>=1.15.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	cryptography	`>=37`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	distro	`>=1.9.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	filelock	`>=3.8.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jsonschema	`>=4.10.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	packaging	`>=22.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pathspec	`>=1.0.3,<1.2.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyyaml	`>=6.0.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyyaml	`>=6.0.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	referencing	`>=0.36.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	ruamel-yaml	`>=0.18.11`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	subprocess-tee	`>=0.4.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	wcmatch	`>=8.1.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	wcmatch	`>=8.5.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	yamllint	`>=1.38.0`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 302

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 284 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	ansible-compat	`26.8.0`	direct
PyPI	ansible-core	`2.16.19`	direct
PyPI	ansible-core	`2.19.12`	direct
PyPI	ansible-core	`2.21.3`	direct
PyPI	black	`26.5.1`	direct
PyPI	cffi	`2.1.1`	direct
PyPI	cryptography	`50.0.1`	direct
PyPI	distro	`1.9.0`	direct
PyPI	filelock	`3.32.4`	direct
PyPI	jsonschema	`4.26.0`	direct
PyPI	packaging	`26.3`	direct
PyPI	pathspec	`1.1.1`	direct
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	direct
PyPI	referencing	`0.37.0`	direct
PyPI	ruamel-yaml	`0.19.1`	direct
PyPI	subprocess-tee	`0.4.2`	direct
PyPI	wcmatch	`11.0.1`	direct
PyPI	yamllint	`1.38.0`	direct
npm	@cspotcode/source-map-support	`0.8.1`	indirect
npm	@isaacs/cliui	`8.0.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.0.7`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.4.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.9`	indirect
npm	@pkgjs/parseargs	`0.11.0`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/node10	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/node12	`1.0.9`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/node14	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/node16	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/chai	`5.2.3`	indirect
npm	@types/deep-eql	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/js-yaml	`4.0.9`	indirect
npm	@types/minimatch	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	@types/mocha	`10.0.10`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`25.3.0`	indirect
npm	@vscode/l10n	`0.0.18`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.6.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-walk	`8.2.0`	indirect
npm	ajv	`8.18.0`	indirect
npm	ajv-formats	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`6.2.1`	indirect
npm	arg	`4.1.3`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	assertion-error	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.3`	indirect
npm	browser-stdout	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	camelcase	`6.2.0`	indirect
npm	chai	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	chokidar	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	cliui	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	create-require	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.3.5`	indirect
npm	decamelize	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	diff	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	diff	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	eastasianwidth	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`9.2.2`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-uri	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat	`5.0.2`	indirect
npm	foreground-child	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	glob	`10.5.0`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	he	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-path-inside	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-plain-obj	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-unicode-supported	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	jackspeak	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	jsonc-parser	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	log-symbols	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`10.4.3`	indirect
npm	make-error	`1.3.6`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.4`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`9.0.9`	indirect
npm	minipass	`7.1.2`	indirect
npm	mocha	`11.7.5`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	package-json-from-dist	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-scurry	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	prettier	`3.9.6`	indirect
npm	readdirp	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	require-directory	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	require-from-string	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	safe-stable-stringify	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	serialize-javascript	`7.0.7`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	string-width	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`8.1.1`	indirect
npm	ts-node	`10.9.2`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.9.3`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`7.18.2`	indirect
npm	v8-compile-cache-lib	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	vscode-json-languageservice	`5.7.2`	indirect
npm	vscode-languageserver-textdocument	`1.0.12`	indirect
npm	vscode-languageserver-types	`3.17.5`	indirect
npm	vscode-uri	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	workerpool	`9.3.3`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`8.1.0`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yargs	`17.7.2`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`21.1.1`	indirect
npm	yargs-unparser	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	yn	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	ansible-creator	`26.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	argcomplete	`3.7.2`	indirect
PyPI	ast-serialize	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	asttokens	`3.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`26.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	babel	`2.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	backports-tarfile	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	backrefs	`8.0`	indirect
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	bindep	`2.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	boolean-py	`5.0`	indirect
PyPI	bracex	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	build	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	cachetools	`7.1.7`	indirect
PyPI	cairocffi	`1.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	cairosvg	`2.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.7.22`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	check-jsonschema	`0.38.0`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	codespell	`2.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.15.4`	indirect
PyPI	coverage-enable-subprocess	`1.0`	indirect
PyPI	csscompressor	`0.9.5`	indirect
PyPI	cssselect2	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	decorator	`5.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	defusedxml	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	distlib	`0.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	dnspython	`2.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	docutils	`0.23`	indirect
PyPI	exceptiongroup	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	execnet	`2.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	executing	`2.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	ghp-import	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	gitdb	`4.0.12`	indirect
PyPI	gitpython	`3.1.60`	indirect
PyPI	griffelib	`2.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	hjson	`3.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	htmlmin2	`0.1.13`	indirect
PyPI	id	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.19`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`9.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	ipdb	`0.13.13`	indirect
PyPI	ipython	`8.39.0`	indirect
PyPI	ipython	`9.16.1`	indirect
PyPI	ipython-pygments-lexers	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-classes	`3.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-context	`6.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-functools	`4.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	jedi	`0.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	jeepney	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	jmespath	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsmin	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema-specifications	`2025.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	keyring	`25.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	librt	`0.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	license-expression	`30.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	linkchecker	`10.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	markdown	`3.10.3`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-exec	`1.12.3`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-include	`0.8.1`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	matplotlib-inline	`0.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	mergedeep	`1.3.4`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-ansible	`25.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-ansible	`26.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-autorefs	`1.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-gen-files	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-get-deps	`0.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-htmlproofer-plugin	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-macros-plugin	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-material	`9.7.7`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-material-extensions	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-minify-plugin	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocstrings	`1.0.6`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocstrings-python	`2.0.7`	indirect
PyPI	more-itertools	`11.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	mypy	`2.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	netaddr	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	nh3	`0.3.7`	indirect
PyPI	nodeenv	`1.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	paginate	`0.5.7`	indirect
PyPI	parsley	`1.3`	indirect
PyPI	parso	`0.8.7`	indirect
PyPI	pbr	`7.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	pexpect	`4.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	pillow	`12.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pip	`26.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	pipx	`1.16.7`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.11.4`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	prek	`0.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	prompt-toolkit	`3.0.53`	indirect
PyPI	properdocs	`1.6.7`	indirect
PyPI	psutil	`7.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	ptyprocess	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	pure-eval	`0.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.21.0`	indirect
PyPI	pygments-ansi-color	`0.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pymdown-extensions	`11.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyproject-api	`1.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyproject-hooks	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyright	`1.1.411`	indirect
PyPI	pyrsistent	`0.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-instafail	`0.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-mock	`3.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-xdist	`3.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	python-discovery	`1.5.3`	indirect
PyPI	pytokens	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	pywin32-ctypes	`0.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml-env-tag	`1.1`	indirect
PyPI	readme-renderer	`45.0`	indirect
PyPI	regress	`2025.10.1`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	indirect
PyPI	requests-toolbelt	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	resolvelib	`1.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	resolvelib	`1.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	rfc3986	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rich	`15.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rpds-py	`0.30.0`	indirect
PyPI	rpds-py	`2026.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	ruamel-yaml-clib	`0.2.15`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.16.4`	indirect
PyPI	secretstorage	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`84.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools-scm	`10.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	smmap	`5.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	soupsieve	`2.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	stack-data	`0.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	super-collections	`0.6.2`	indirect
PyPI	termcolor	`3.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	tinycss2	`1.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	tombi	`1.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	tomli-w	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	tox	`4.60.1`	indirect
PyPI	tox-extra	`2.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	tox-uv	`1.36.0`	indirect
PyPI	tox-uv-bare	`1.36.0`	indirect
PyPI	traitlets	`5.16.1`	indirect
PyPI	twine	`7.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	types-jsonschema	`4.26.0.20260518`	indirect
PyPI	types-pyyaml	`6.0.12.20260815`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	userpath	`1.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	uv	`0.12.6`	indirect
PyPI	vcs-versioning	`2.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	virtualenv	`21.7.5`	indirect
PyPI	watchdog	`6.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	wcwidth	`0.8.2`	indirect
PyPI	webencodings	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	zipp	`4.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:ansible-lint@26.8.0 pulls in 28 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records