Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-08-08 18:43 UTC

ansible / molecule

An ansible-native testing framework for collections, playbooks, and roles with configurable workflows for testing any system or service

PythonMIT★ 4,128 stars⑂ 673 forkssince Nov 2015View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolPluginhow this is determined

#python #ansible #testing #testing-framework #testinfra #molecule-driver #podman #cookiecutter-ansible #hacktoberfest #supports-dot-config #pep-621 #ansible-dev-tools

ansible/molecule holds a health index of 98 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (66/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 86 is calibrated to 98 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AnsibleOrganization

3,713 followers303 public repossince Mar 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	moleculepoints to another repo — not scored	26.6.0	-	123	39 days ago	ansible molecule roles testing

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

94Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
29.8/36	Commit cadence — 43/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 143 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	143
human_commit_share	0.54
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	43

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 94 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 39 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~37.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	94
latest_release_tag	v26.6.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	39
mean_days_between_releases	37.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

90Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

94Exceptional

How it's scored

58.6/60	Stars — 4,128 stars
23.6/25	Forks — 673 forks
11.3/15	Watchers — 108 watchers

Inputs used

forks	673
stars	4,128
watchers	108
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

85Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	7
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	github.com, readthedocs.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

62Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 40% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 96 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 88 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	96
top_contributor_share	0.397

Issue & PR responsiveness

88Excellent

How it's scored

40.1/42	Issue resolution — 95% of issues closed
25.3/30	PR acceptance — 2,292/2,713 decided PRs merged
7.8/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 3/5 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	2,292
open_issues	71
closed_issues	1,465
prs_merged_7d	9
prs_decided_7d	9
prs_merged_30d	14
prs_decided_30d	16
issue_closed_ratio	0.954
closed_unmerged_prs	421
first_time_authors_30d	4
first_time_prs_merged_30d	3
first_time_prs_decided_30d	5

Ownership & stewardship

80Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 3,713 followers of ansible
25/25	Track record — 303 public repos, account ~14 yr old

Inputs used

followers	3,713
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	ansible
public_repos	303
account_age_days	5,268

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — biome.json
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://ansible.readthedocs.io/projects/molecule/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 12 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	python, ansible, testing, testing-framework, testinfra, molecule-driver, podman, cookiecutter-ansible, hacktoberfest, supports-dot-config, pep-621, ansible-dev-tools
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://ansible.readthedocs.io/projects/molecule/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

78Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

73Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 88 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 6 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	7.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): signed_releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	25
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:molecule@26.6.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 25 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 54 of 54 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

90Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — mise.toml
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — biome.json
11/11	Static type checking — src/molecule/py.typed
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 8 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 45 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	uv.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	mise.toml
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	src/molecule/py.typed
agent_commit_share	0.08
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.45

Code legibility for models

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/molecule/py.typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/160 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	44,834
source_files_sampled	160
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — example, examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	example, examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—

Key facts

4,128GitHub stars

96contributors

143commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

94releases

2bus factor

71open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
pypi package 'molecule' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ansible-community/molecule); excluded from ecosystem scoring
Could not fetch pypi package 'community-molecule' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 673 ⇿

0Stars

673Forks

94Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 4Minor 25Patch 39

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.3 / 10

7.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-08 18:42 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
8	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
10	Contributors	project has 88 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
9	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4	Vulnerabilities	6 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 11

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	ansible-compat	`>=25.1.4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	ansible-core	`>=2.15.0,!=2.17.*`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	click	`>=8.0,<9`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	enrich	`>=1.2.7`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jinja2	`>=2.11.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jsonschema	`>=4.9.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	packaging	`>=23.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pluggy	`>=0.7.1,<2.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyyaml	`>=5.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	rich	`>=9.5.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	wcmatch	`>=8.1.2`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 181

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 168 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	ansible-compat	`26.6.0`	direct
PyPI	ansible-core	`2.16.19`	direct
PyPI	ansible-core	`2.19.11`	direct
PyPI	ansible-core	`2.21.2`	direct
PyPI	click	`8.4.2`	direct
PyPI	enrich	`1.2.7`	direct
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	direct
PyPI	jsonschema	`4.26.0`	direct
PyPI	packaging	`26.2`	direct
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	direct
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	direct
PyPI	rich	`15.0.0`	direct
PyPI	wcmatch	`11.0`	direct
PyPI	ansi2html	`1.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	ansible-builder	`3.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	ansible-lint	`26.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	ansible-navigator	`26.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	ansible-runner	`2.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	argcomplete	`3.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	ast-serialize	`0.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	astroid	`4.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`26.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	babel	`2.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	backports-tarfile	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	backrefs	`8.0`	indirect
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	bindep	`2.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	black	`26.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	bracex	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	build	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	cachetools	`7.1.7`	indirect
PyPI	cairocffi	`1.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	cairosvg	`2.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.7.22`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.9`	indirect
PyPI	codespell	`2.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.15.3`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`50.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	csscompressor	`0.9.5`	indirect
PyPI	cssselect2	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	defusedxml	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	dill	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	distlib	`0.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	distro	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	dnspython	`2.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	docker	`7.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	docstring-parser-fork	`0.0.16`	indirect
PyPI	docutils	`0.23`	indirect
PyPI	exceptiongroup	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	execnet	`2.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.32.2`	indirect
PyPI	ghp-import	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	gitdb	`4.0.12`	indirect
PyPI	gitpython	`3.1.57`	indirect
PyPI	griffelib	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	hjson	`3.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	htmlmin2	`0.1.13`	indirect
PyPI	id	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.18`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`9.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	isort	`8.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-classes	`3.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-context	`6.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-functools	`4.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	jeepney	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsmin	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema-specifications	`2025.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	keyring	`25.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	librt	`0.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	linkchecker	`10.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	lockfile	`0.12.2`	indirect
PyPI	markdown	`3.10.3`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-exec	`1.12.3`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-include	`0.8.1`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	mccabe	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	mergedeep	`1.3.4`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-ansible	`25.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-ansible	`26.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-autorefs	`1.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-gen-files	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-get-deps	`0.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-htmlproofer-plugin	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-macros-plugin	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-material	`9.7.7`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-material-extensions	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-minify-plugin	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-monorepo-plugin	`1.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocstrings	`1.0.6`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocstrings-python	`2.0.5`	indirect
PyPI	molecule	`—`	indirect
PyPI	more-itertools	`11.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	mypy	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	nh3	`0.3.6`	indirect
PyPI	onigurumacffi	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	paginate	`0.5.7`	indirect
PyPI	parsley	`1.3`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pbr	`7.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	pexpect	`4.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	pillow	`12.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pip	`26.2`	indirect
PyPI	pipx	`1.16.5`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	prek	`0.4.11`	indirect
PyPI	properdocs	`1.6.7`	indirect
PyPI	ptyprocess	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydoclint	`0.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pylint	`4.0.6`	indirect
PyPI	pymdown-extensions	`11.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	pyproject-api	`1.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyproject-hooks	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-ansible	`26.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-instafail	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-instafail	`0.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-mock	`3.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-plus	`0.8.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-xdist	`3.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-daemon	`3.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	python-discovery	`1.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	python-slugify	`8.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	pytokens	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	pywin32	`312`	indirect
PyPI	pywin32-ctypes	`0.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml-env-tag	`1.1`	indirect
PyPI	readme-renderer	`45.0`	indirect
PyPI	referencing	`0.37.0`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	indirect
PyPI	requests-toolbelt	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	resolvelib	`1.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	resolvelib	`1.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	rfc3986	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rpds-py	`0.30.0`	indirect
PyPI	rpds-py	`2026.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	ruamel-yaml	`0.19.1`	indirect
PyPI	ruamel-yaml-clib	`0.2.15`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.16.1`	indirect
PyPI	secretstorage	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`83.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	smmap	`5.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	soupsieve	`2.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	subprocess-tee	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	super-collections	`0.6.2`	indirect
PyPI	termcolor	`3.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	text-unidecode	`1.3`	indirect
PyPI	tinycss2	`1.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	tombi	`1.2.5`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	tomli-w	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomlkit	`0.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	tox	`4.58.0`	indirect
PyPI	tox-ansible	`26.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	tox-extra	`2.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	tox-uv	`1.36.0`	indirect
PyPI	tox-uv-bare	`1.36.0`	indirect
PyPI	twine	`7.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	types-jsonschema	`4.26.0.20260518`	indirect
PyPI	types-pexpect	`4.9.0.20260518`	indirect
PyPI	types-pyyaml	`6.0.12.20260724`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	tzdata	`2026.3`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	userpath	`1.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	uv	`0.12.1`	indirect
PyPI	virtualenv	`21.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	watchdog	`6.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	webencodings	`0.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	yamllint	`1.38.0`	indirect
PyPI	zipp	`4.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:molecule@26.6.0 pulls in 25 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Related records