Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 06:37 UTC

aperturerobotics / starpc

Protobuf 3 streaming RPCs for TypeScript, Go, Rust, C++

Rust · Go · PythonMIT★ 79 stars⑂ 6 forkssince May 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

aperturerobotics/starpc holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (91/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (57/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Aperture RoboticsOrganization
57 followers89 public repossince Jul 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Gogithub.com/aperturerobotics/starpcv0.52.1-24613 days ago
crates.iostarpc0.52.1582413 days agostreamingrpcprotobufgrpcasynchronousnetwork-programming
npmstarpc0.52.124,80223813 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
20.8/36Commit cadence30/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume224 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year224
human_commit_share0.92
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year30

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases36 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 13 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~12 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count36
latest_release_tagv0.52.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release13
mean_days_between_releases12
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

57Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
30.7/60Stars79 stars
5.8/25Forks6 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars79
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
58.6/80Monthly downloads24,860 downloads/month across crates, go, npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/aperturerobotics/starpc, starpc, starpc
dependents
ecosystemscrates, go, npm
total_downloads434
monthly_downloads24,860
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.999
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
27.3/30PR acceptance189/208 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs189
open_issues0
closed_issues12
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs19
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
12.7/25Owner reach57 followers of aperturerobotics
25/25Track record89 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers57
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginaperturerobotics
public_repos89
account_age_days3,712

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable3 package(s) on crates, go, npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 13 days ago
20/20Version history246 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/aperturerobotics/starpc, starpc, starpc
ecosystemscrates, go, npm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish13

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/starpc
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsrpc, rpc-framework, typescript, websocket, go, protobuf, rust
has_wikino
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/starpc
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

71Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities26 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages1
assessed_packages30
unassessed_packages27
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 30 resolved dependencies against OSV. 27 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history92 of 92 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml, echo/Cargo.toml, go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml
11/11Static type checkingrpcstream/py.typed, srpc/py.typed, starpc/py.typed, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance8 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, uv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsrpcstream/py.typed, srpc/py.typed, starpc/py.typed, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, echo/Cargo.toml, go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.08
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/251 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes54,729
source_files_sampled251
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)echo/echo.proto, mock/mock.proto, rpcstream/rpcstream.proto, srpc/rpcproto.proto
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesecho/echo.proto, mock/mock.proto, rpcstream/rpcstream.proto, srpc/rpcproto.proto
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

79GitHub stars
2contributors
224commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
36releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, Go, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'starpc' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'echo-example' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿
0Stars
6Forks
35Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

123456612022-102024-092026-09
Major 0Minor 11Patch 24

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 06:37 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities26 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 38
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioprostCargo.toml
crates.iobytesCargo.toml
crates.iotokioCargo.toml
crates.iotokio-utilCargo.toml
crates.iofuturesCargo.toml
crates.iothiserrorCargo.toml
crates.ioasync-traitCargo.toml
crates.iopin-project-liteCargo.toml
crates.ioscopeguardCargo.toml
crates.ioprost-build0.14Cargo.toml
crates.ioprotoc-bin-vendored3.2Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-tungstenite0.30Cargo.toml
crates.ioyamux0.14.0Cargo.toml
crates.iostarpcecho/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprostecho/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1echo/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-traitecho/Cargo.toml
Gogithub.com/aperturerobotics/commonv0.35.1-0.20260808123156-c77af26f63bdgo.mod
Gogithub.com/aperturerobotics/protobuf-go-litev0.16.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/aperturerobotics/utilv1.34.9go.mod
Gogithub.com/aperturerobotics/abseil-cppv0.0.0-20260131110040-4bb56e2f9017go.mod
Gogithub.com/aperturerobotics/go-websocketv1.8.15-0.20260619192713-a096778f08c1go.mod
Gogithub.com/aperturerobotics/protobufv0.0.0-20260203024654-8201686529c4go.mod
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.5-0.20260629095817-a23d315dfebbgo.mod
Gogithub.com/libp2p/go-yamux/v5v5.1.0go.mod
npm@aptre/it-ws^1.1.2package.json
npm@aptre/protobuf-es-lite1.1.1package.json
npm@aptre/yamux^1.0.3package.json
npmevent-iterator^2.0.0package.json
npmisomorphic-ws^5.0.0package.json
npmit-first^3.0.11package.json
npmit-pipe^3.0.1package.json
npmit-pushable^3.2.3package.json
npmit-stream-types^2.0.4package.json
npmuint8arraylist^3.0.0package.json
npmws^8.20.0package.json
PyPIprotobuf==6.33.5pyproject.toml
All dependencies 57

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 26 direct and 31 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioprost-builddirect
crates.ioprotoc-bin-vendoreddirect
crates.iotokiodirect
crates.iotokio-tungstenitedirect
crates.ioyamuxdirect
Gogithub.com/aperturerobotics/abseil-cppv0.0.0-20260131110040-4bb56e2f9017direct
Gogithub.com/aperturerobotics/commonv0.35.1-0.20260808123156-c77af26f63bddirect
Gogithub.com/aperturerobotics/go-websocketv1.8.15-0.20260619192713-a096778f08c1direct
Gogithub.com/aperturerobotics/protobufv0.0.0-20260203024654-8201686529c4direct
Gogithub.com/aperturerobotics/protobuf-go-litev0.16.0direct
Gogithub.com/aperturerobotics/utilv1.34.9direct
Gogithub.com/libp2p/go-yamux/v5v5.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1direct
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.5-0.20260629095817-a23d315dfebbdirect
npm@aptre/it-ws^1.1.2direct
npm@aptre/protobuf-es-lite1.1.1direct
npm@aptre/yamux^1.0.3direct
npmevent-iterator^2.0.0direct
npmisomorphic-ws^5.0.0direct
npmit-first^3.0.11direct
npmit-pipe^3.0.1direct
npmit-pushable^3.2.3direct
npmit-stream-types^2.0.4direct
npmuint8arraylist^3.0.0direct
npmws^8.20.0direct
PyPIprotobuf6.33.5direct
crates.ioserde_jsonindirect
Gogithub.com/aperturerobotics/cliv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aperturerobotics/go-protoc-gen-prostv0.0.0-20260705010911-9f53feac967bindirect
Gogithub.com/aperturerobotics/go-protoc-wasiv0.0.0-20260808023521-7b1595380c3findirect
Gogithub.com/aperturerobotics/json-iterator-litev1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/libp2p/go-buffer-poolv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tetratelabs/wazerov1.12.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xrash/smetricsv0.0.0-20250705151800-55b8f293f342indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.40.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.28.0indirect
npm@typescript/native-preview^7.0.0-dev.20260422.1indirect
npmdepcheck^1.4.6indirect
npmesbuild^0.28.0indirect
npmhappy-dom^20.9.0indirect
npmhusky^9.1.7indirect
npmlint-staged^17.0.0indirect
npmoxfmt0.62.0indirect
npmoxlint^1.76.0indirect
npmrimraf^6.1.3indirect
npmtsx^4.20.4indirect
npmvitest^4.1.5indirect
PyPImypy1.17.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIruff0.16.2indirect
PyPIsetuptoolsindirect
PyPIstarpc0.52.0indirect
PyPIstarpc-python-plugin0.52.0indirect
PyPItypes-protobuf7.34.1.20260518indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 30 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 27 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
google.golang.org/protobuf1.28.0indirecthigh21.33.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo, crates.io, npm.