Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 20:13 UTC

apify / apify-sdk-python

Apify SDK for Python—The official library for building Apify Actors: serverless cloud programs for web scraping, browser automation, data processing, and AI agents. Manages the Actor lifecycle, storages (datasets, key-value stores, request queues), events, proxies, and pay-per-event monetization. Built on top of the the Apify API Client.

Python · MDXApache-2.0★ 176 stars⑂ 27 forkssince Dec 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolWeb interfacehow this is determined

apify/apify-sdk-python holds a health index of 97 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (100/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (68/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

97
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

97
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 85 is calibrated to 97 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ApifyOrganization · verified domain
2,309 followers261 public repossince Dec 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIapify4.0.2232,6142018 days agoapifysdkautomationchromecrawleecrawlerheadlessscraperscraping

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

100Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
36/36Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 624 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year624
human_commit_share0.64
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year52

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 56 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 8 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~22 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count56
latest_release_tagv4.0.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release8
mean_days_between_releases22
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
36.4/60Stars — 176 stars
11.8/25Forks — 27 forks
5/15Watchers — 9 watchers
Inputs used
forks27
stars176
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, codecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
71.6/80Monthly downloads — 232,614 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesapify
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads232,614
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

84Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 50% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 27 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled27
top_contributor_share0.496
How it's scored
39.9/42Issue resolution — 95% of issues closed
26.6/30PR acceptance — 816/920 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 9/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs816
open_issues9
closed_issues176
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d12
prs_decided_30d12
issue_closed_ratio0.951
closed_unmerged_prs104
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
24.2/25Owner reach — 2,309 followers of apify
25/25Track record — 261 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,309
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginapify
public_repos261
account_age_days3,557

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 8 days ago
20/20Version history — 201 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesapify
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish8

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.apify.com/sdk/python
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 11 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsapify, automation, python, scraping, sdk, actor, crawlee, data-extraction, proxy, web-crawling, web-scraping
has_wikino
homepagehttps://docs.apify.com/sdk/python
docs_sitehttps://docs.apify.com/sdk/python
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

75Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 9/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages33
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:apify@4.0.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 33 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
18/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md (stub)
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.apify.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 64 of 64 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.apify.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes9
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — docs/01_introduction/code/actor_structure/py.typed, docs/03_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/py.typed, docs/03_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/spiders/py.typed, src/apify/events/py.typed, src/apify/py.typed, src/apify/request_loaders/py.typed, src/apify/scrapy/middlewares/py.typed, src/apify/scrapy/pipelines/py.typed, src/apify/scrapy/py.typed, src/apify/storage_clients/_apify/py.typed, src/apify/storage_clients/py.typed, src/apify/storages/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-2.7/01_introduction/code/actor_structure/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-2.7/02_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-2.7/02_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/spiders/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-3.4/01_introduction/code/actor_structure/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-3.4/03_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-3.4/03_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/spiders/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-4.0/01_introduction/code/actor_structure/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-4.0/03_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-4.0/03_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/spiders/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
6/10Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 35 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml, uv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsdocs/01_introduction/code/actor_structure/py.typed, docs/03_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/py.typed, docs/03_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/spiders/py.typed, src/apify/events/py.typed, src/apify/py.typed, src/apify/request_loaders/py.typed, src/apify/scrapy/middlewares/py.typed, src/apify/scrapy/pipelines/py.typed, src/apify/scrapy/py.typed, src/apify/storage_clients/_apify/py.typed, src/apify/storage_clients/py.typed, src/apify/storages/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-2.7/01_introduction/code/actor_structure/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-2.7/02_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-2.7/02_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/spiders/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-3.4/01_introduction/code/actor_structure/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-3.4/03_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-3.4/03_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/spiders/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-4.0/01_introduction/code/actor_structure/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-4.0/03_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-4.0/03_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/spiders/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.03
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.35
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (docs/01_introduction/code/actor_structure/py.typed, docs/03_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/py.typed, docs/03_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/spiders/py.typed, src/apify/events/py.typed, src/apify/py.typed, src/apify/request_loaders/py.typed, src/apify/scrapy/middlewares/py.typed, src/apify/scrapy/pipelines/py.typed, src/apify/scrapy/py.typed, src/apify/storage_clients/_apify/py.typed, src/apify/storage_clients/py.typed, src/apify/storages/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-2.7/01_introduction/code/actor_structure/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-2.7/02_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-2.7/02_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/spiders/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-3.4/01_introduction/code/actor_structure/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-3.4/03_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-3.4/03_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/spiders/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-4.0/01_introduction/code/actor_structure/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-4.0/03_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/py.typed, website/versioned_docs/version-4.0/03_guides/code/scrapy_project/src/spiders/py.typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes — 2/533 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes70,878
source_files_sampled533
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

176GitHub stars
27contributors
624commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
56releases
2bus factor
9open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 27 ⇿
0Stars
27Forks
51Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0510152025302722023-032024-112026-07
Major 3Minor 18Patch 30

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.9 / 10
6.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 20:12 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 9/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 25
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIapify-client>=3.1.0,<4.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcrawlee>=1.8.0,<2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcachetools>=5.5.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography>=42.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIimpit>=0.8.0pyproject.toml
PyPIlazy-object-proxy>=1.11.0pyproject.toml
PyPImore_itertools>=10.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.11.0pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions>=4.4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIwebsockets>=14.0pyproject.toml
PyPIyarl>=1.18.0pyproject.toml
npm@apify/docs-theme^1.0.271website/package.json
npm@apify/docusaurus-plugin-typedoc-api^5.1.16website/package.json
npm@docusaurus/core^3.10.2website/package.json
npm@docusaurus/faster^3.10.2website/package.json
npm@docusaurus/plugin-client-redirects^3.10.2website/package.json
npm@docusaurus/preset-classic^3.10.2website/package.json
npm@signalwire/docusaurus-plugin-llms-txt^1.2.2website/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1website/package.json
npmdocusaurus-gtm-plugin^0.0.2website/package.json
npmprop-types^15.8.1website/package.json
npmraw-loader^4.0.2website/package.json
npmreact^19.2.8website/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.8website/package.json
npmunist-util-visit^5.1.0website/package.json
All dependencies 136

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 124 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIapify-client3.2.0direct
PyPIcachetools7.1.8direct
PyPIcrawlee—direct
PyPIcrawlee1.10.0direct
PyPIcryptography50.0.1direct
PyPIimpit0.14.0direct
PyPIlazy-object-proxy1.12.0direct
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.5direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0direct
PyPIwebsockets17.1direct
PyPIyarl1.24.5direct
npm@pnpm/exe.darwin-arm6412.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.darwin-x6412.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-arm6412.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-arm64-musl12.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-x6412.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-x64-musl12.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.win32-arm6412.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.win32-x6412.3.4indirect
npmloader-utils^3.2.1indirect
npmpnpm12.3.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.15.1indirect
PyPIapify—indirect
PyPIapify4.0.2indirect
PyPIapify-sdk-wheel-placeholder—indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIautomat25.4.16indirect
PyPIbackports-zstd1.7.0indirect
PyPIblack26.5.1indirect
PyPIbrotli1.2.0indirect
PyPIbrotlicffi1.2.0.2indirect
PyPIbuild1.6.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.1indirect
PyPIclick8.5.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIconstantly23.10.4indirect
PyPIcoverage7.16.0indirect
PyPIcssselect1.5.0indirect
PyPIdatabind4.5.5indirect
PyPIdatabind-core4.5.5indirect
PyPIdatabind-json4.5.5indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.3.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdnspython2.8.0indirect
PyPIdocspec2.2.1indirect
PyPIdocspec-python2.2.2indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.11indirect
PyPIemail-validator2.3.0indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.5indirect
PyPIgriffe2.3.0indirect
PyPIgriffecli2.3.0indirect
PyPIgriffelib2.3.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttptools0.8.0indirect
PyPIhyperlink21.0.0indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.19indirect
PyPIincremental24.11.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIitemadapter0.13.1indirect
PyPIitemloaders1.4.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIlxml6.1.3indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInr-date2.1.0indirect
PyPInr-stream1.1.5indirect
PyPInr-util0.8.12indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIparsel1.11.0indirect
PyPIpastel0.2.1indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.7indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpoethepoet0.48.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIprotego0.6.2indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.15.0indirect
PyPIpydispatcher2.0.7indirect
PyPIpydoc-markdown4.8.2indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpyopenssl26.4.0indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpypydispatcher2.1.2indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-httpserver1.1.5indirect
PyPIpytest-timeout2.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.6.0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.3indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIqueuelib1.10.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequests-file3.0.1indirect
PyPIruff0.16.6indirect
PyPIscrapy2.18.0indirect
PyPIservice-identity26.1.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools84.0.0indirect
PyPItldextract5.3.2indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomli-w1.2.0indirect
PyPItwisted26.4.0indirect
PyPIty0.0.78indirect
PyPItypeapi2.3.0indirect
PyPItypes-cachetools7.0.0.20260713indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.4indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn—indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.52.4indirect
PyPIuvloop0.22.1indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.7.8indirect
PyPIw3lib2.4.1indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.2.0indirect
PyPIwerkzeug3.1.8indirect
PyPIwrapt2.4.0indirect
PyPIyapf0.43.0indirect
PyPIzope-interface8.6indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:apify@4.0.2 pulls in 33 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.