Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 00:43 UTC

askalf / deepdive

Local research agent — one command, a cited answer with its trust signals: source-authority mix, lexical citation verification, confidence, cost. CLI + MCP server. Runs on your own LLM router; nightly public report card. Zero hosted dependencies.

JavaScript · TypeScriptMIT★ 2 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Apr 2026archivedView on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryMCP serverhow this is determined

#ai #cli #llm #research-agent #search #anthropic #citations #claude #deep-research #perplexity-alternative #self-hosted #mcp #model-context-protocol

askalf/deepdive holds a health index of 19 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Security (87/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (44/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.

overall / 100

Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Thomas SprayberryPersonal account

28 followers24 public repossince Feb 2026Sprayberry Labs

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	@askalf/deepdive	0.32.1	360	40	46 days ago	research agent llm local cli anthropic openai claude search deep-research perplexity-alternative cite citations self-hosted

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

68Good

Abandonment alert

Work has arrived and nobody has attended to it

archived on GitHub by its maintainersOverall rating: Critical ceiling

Silence alone is never the finding — a small, finished library may need no commits for years. This alert requires both: no human commit for a long time, and obligations the project is visibly not discharging. Automated commits do not count as maintenance.

How abandonment is assessed

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 7 days ago
13.8/36	Commit cadence — 20/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 196 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project is archived

Inputs used

commits_last_year	196
human_commit_share	0.65
days_since_last_push	7
active_weeks_last_year	20

Release discipline

98Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 40 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 46 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~3.6 days
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 3 out of the last 3 releases have a total of 3 signed artifacts.

Inputs used

releases_count	40
latest_release_tag	v0.32.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	46
mean_days_between_releases	3.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

2Critical

How it's scored

0/60	Stars — 2 stars
2.5/25	Forks — 3 forks
0/15	Watchers — 0 watchers

Inputs used

forks	3
stars	2
watchers	0
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

43Weak

How it's scored

34.1/80	Monthly downloads — 360 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	@askalf/deepdive
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	360
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

15Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
2.7/13.5	Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	2
top_contributor_share	0.993

Issue & PR responsiveness

99Exceptional

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
29.4/30	PR acceptance — 189/193 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	189
open_issues	0
closed_issues	20
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	4
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

40Weak

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
10.5/25	Owner reach — 28 followers of askalf
11.3/25	Track record — 24 public repos, account ~0 yr old

Inputs used

followers	28
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	askalf
public_repos	24
account_age_days	203

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 46 days ago
20/20	Version history — 40 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	@askalf/deepdive
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	46

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 12 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://www.npmjs.com/package/@askalf/deepdive
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 13 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	ai, cli, llm, research-agent, search, anthropic, citations, claude, deep-research, perplexity-alternative, self-hosted, mcp, model-context-protocol
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://www.npmjs.com/package/@askalf/deepdive
docs_site	https://www.npmjs.com/package/@askalf/deepdive
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

87Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

84Excellent

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5	Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — project is archived
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5	SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
6/7.5	Signed-Releases — 3 out of the last 3 releases have a total of 3 signed artifacts.
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
5.2/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	18
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	0
scorecard_aggregate	8.4

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	110
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@askalf/deepdive@0.32.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 110 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.anthropic.com/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 62 of 65 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://docs.anthropic.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.954
agent_instruction_files	CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	4,940

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

63Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
2/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 35 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0.01
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.35

Code legibility for models

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (tsconfig.json)
54.6/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/135 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	76,358
source_files_sampled	135
oversized_source_files	1

Machine-readable interfaces

33At Risk

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20	MCP server
0/40	Runnable examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	—
has_mcp_signal	yes
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2GitHub stars

2contributors

196commits, last 12 months

7days since last push

40releases

1bus factor

0open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿

0Stars

3Forks

38Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 29Patch 9

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.4 / 10

8.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 00:42 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
8	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
10	Fuzzing	project is fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	project is archived
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
10	Pinned-Dependencies	all dependencies are pinned
10	SAST	SAST tool is run on all commits
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
8	Signed-Releases	3 out of the last 3 releases have a total of 3 signed artifacts.
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7	Vulnerabilities	3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 3

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	@modelcontextprotocol/sdk	`^1.29.0`	package.json
npm	playwright	`^1.47.0`	package.json
npm	zod	`^4.4.3`	package.json

All dependencies 241

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 238 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@modelcontextprotocol/sdk	`1.30.0`	direct
npm	playwright	`1.62.1`	direct
npm	zod	`4.4.3`	direct
npm	@babel/code-frame	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/compat-data	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/core	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/generator	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-compilation-targets	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-globals	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-module-imports	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-module-transforms	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-string-parser	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-option	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helpers	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/parser	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/template	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/traverse	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/types	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@hono/node-server	`1.19.15`	indirect
npm	@isaacs/fs-minipass	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	@istanbuljs/schema	`0.1.6`	indirect
npm	@jazzer.js/bug-detectors	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@jazzer.js/core	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@jazzer.js/fuzzer	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@jazzer.js/hooking	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@jazzer.js/instrumentor	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/remapping	`2.3.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/canvas	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/canvas-android-arm64	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/canvas-darwin-arm64	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/canvas-darwin-x64	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/canvas-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/canvas-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/canvas-linux-arm64-musl	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/canvas-linux-riscv64-gnu	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/canvas-linux-x64-gnu	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/canvas-linux-x64-musl	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/canvas-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/canvas-win32-x64-msvc	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`26.4.0`	indirect
npm	accepts	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	ajv	`8.20.0`	indirect
npm	ajv-formats	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	append-transform	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	baseline-browser-mapping	`2.11.20`	indirect
npm	bindings	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	body-parser	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	browserslist	`4.28.8`	indirect
npm	buffer-from	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	bytes	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	call-bound	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	caniuse-lite	`1.0.30001810`	indirect
npm	chownr	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	cliui	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	cmake-js	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	content-disposition	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	content-type	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	content-type	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	convert-source-map	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	cookie	`0.7.2`	indirect
npm	cookie-signature	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	cors	`2.8.6`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	deep-extend	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	default-require-extensions	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	depd	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	ee-first	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	electron-to-chromium	`1.5.420`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	encodeurl	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	escape-html	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	etag	`1.8.1`	indirect
npm	eventsource	`3.0.7`	indirect
npm	eventsource-parser	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	express	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	express-rate-limit	`8.5.2`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-uri	`3.1.7`	indirect
npm	file-uri-to-path	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	finalhandler	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	forwarded	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	fresh	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	fs-extra	`11.3.6`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.2`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	gensync	`1.0.0-beta.2`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	hono	`4.13.0`	indirect
npm	html-escaper	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	http-errors	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.7.3`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	ini	`1.3.8`	indirect
npm	ip-address	`10.4.0`	indirect
npm	ipaddr.js	`1.9.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-promise	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	istanbul-lib-coverage	`3.2.2`	indirect
npm	istanbul-lib-hook	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	istanbul-lib-instrument	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	istanbul-lib-report	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	istanbul-reports	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	jose	`6.2.3`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	jsesc	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	json-schema-typed	`8.0.2`	indirect
npm	json5	`2.2.3`	indirect
npm	jsonfile	`6.2.1`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	make-dir	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	media-typer	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	merge-descriptors	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.54.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	minipass	`7.1.3`	indirect
npm	minizlib	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	negotiator	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	node-addon-api	`8.9.0`	indirect
npm	node-api-headers	`1.9.0`	indirect
npm	node-releases	`2.0.54`	indirect
npm	object-assign	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	object-inspect	`1.13.4`	indirect
npm	on-finished	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	parseurl	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-to-regexp	`8.4.2`	indirect
npm	pdfjs-dist	`6.2.108`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	pkce-challenge	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	playwright-core	`1.62.1`	indirect
npm	proper-lockfile	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	proxy-addr	`2.0.7`	indirect
npm	qs	`6.16.0`	indirect
npm	range-parser	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	raw-body	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	rc	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	require-directory	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	require-from-string	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	retry	`0.12.0`	indirect
npm	router	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	semver	`6.3.1`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.8.5`	indirect
npm	send	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	serve-static	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	setprototypeof	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-list	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-map	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-weakmap	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`3.0.7`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-support	`0.5.21`	indirect
npm	statuses	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-bom	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	tar	`7.5.22`	indirect
npm	tmp	`0.2.7`	indirect
npm	toidentifier	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	tsx	`4.23.12`	indirect
npm	type-is	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.9.3`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`8.3.0`	indirect
npm	universalify	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	unpipe	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	update-browserslist-db	`1.3.2`	indirect
npm	url-join	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	vary	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	which	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yallist	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	yallist	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	yargs	`17.7.3`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`21.1.1`	indirect
npm	zod-to-json-schema	`3.25.2`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@askalf/deepdive@0.32.1 pulls in 110 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records