Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 11:00 UTC

astraly-labs / pragma-sdk

Python SDK to interact with Pragma

PythonNo license detected★ 3 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Aug 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#pragma#python#starknet

astraly-labs/pragma-sdk holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (87/100) and lowest on Security (37/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Astraly LabsOrganization
76 followers46 public repossince Feb 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIpragma-sdk2.18.02,4411720 days agooraclepragmastarknet
PyPIcheckpointerpoints to another repo — not scored2.14.1237552104 days agoasynccachecachingdata-analysisdata-processingfasthashinginvalidationmemoizationoptimizationperformanceworkflow

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

79Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
15.2/36Commit cadence — 22/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 103 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year103
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year22

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2.18.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases1.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

37Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

11Critical
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars — 3 stars
5.8/25Forks — 6 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars3
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

52Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

56Moderate
How it's scored
45.2/80Monthly downloads — 2,441 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespragma-sdk
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,441
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

42Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 56% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 10 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled10
top_contributor_share0.565

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good
How it's scored
39.5/42Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
28.4/30PR acceptance — 276/292 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs276
open_issues4
closed_issues63
prs_merged_7d6
prs_decided_7d6
prs_merged_30d22
prs_decided_30d22
issue_closed_ratio0.94
closed_unmerged_prs16
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

65Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
13.6/25Owner reach — 76 followers of astraly-labs
21.5/25Track record — 46 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers76
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginastraly-labs
public_repos46
account_age_days1,697

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 172 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespragma-sdk
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

83Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

88Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
14/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 22 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://pragma-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspragma, python, starknet
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://pragma-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html
docs_sitehttps://pragma-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

37Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

38Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
1.8/2.5CI-Tests — 22 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 96 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

34At Risk
How it's scored
4.9/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 6 affected: aiohttp 3.13.0 (critical 9.1), protobuf 4.25.8 (high 7.5), protobuf 5.29.5 (high 7.5), +3 more
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
20.5/40No advisories left outstanding — 5 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 287 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories184
affected_packages25
assessed_packages203
unassessed_packages4
affected_by_severitycritical 3, high 11, moderate 10, low 1
direct_affected_packages6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 203 resolved dependencies against OSV. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.pragma.build/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 89 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.pragma.build/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.89
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

71Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — pragma-sdk/docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 44 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filespragma-sdk/docs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.44
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/242 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes33,232
source_files_sampled242
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — pragma-sdk/pragma_sdk/schema/entries.proto
0/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filespragma-sdk/pragma_sdk/schema/entries.proto
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

3GitHub stars
10contributors
103commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
4open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'pragma-monorepo' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'lp-pricer' from its registry
  • pypi package 'checkpointer' points at a different repository (https://github.com/Reddan/checkpointer.git); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'pragma-utils' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'price-pusher' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'vrf-listener' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'lmax-connector' from its registry
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:pragma-sdk@2.18.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿
0Stars
6Forks
30Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

123456612023-092024-082025-07
Major 0Minor 5Patch 24

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.8 / 10
3.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 11:00 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
7CI-Tests22 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities96 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 48
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpragma-sdk—checkpointer/pyproject.toml
PyPIpragma-utils—checkpointer/pyproject.toml
PyPIclick>=8.0.1checkpointer/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.10.0checkpointer/pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv>=1.0.0checkpointer/pyproject.toml
PyPIpragma-sdk—lmax-connector/pyproject.toml
PyPIquickfix-py>=0.0.2lmax-connector/pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv>=1.0.0lmax-connector/pyproject.toml
PyPIfaucon_py==0.1.2lmax-connector/pyproject.toml
PyPIprotobuf>=4.0.0lmax-connector/pyproject.toml
PyPIstarknet.py==0.30.0lp-pricer/pyproject.toml
PyPIpragma-sdk—lp-pricer/pyproject.toml
PyPIpragma-utils—lp-pricer/pyproject.toml
PyPIclick>=8.1.0lp-pricer/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.7.4lp-pricer/pyproject.toml
PyPIredis>=5.0.7lp-pricer/pyproject.toml
PyPIstarknet.py==0.30.0pragma-sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPItyper==0.6.1pragma-sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIdeprecated>=1.2.14pragma-sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIaioresponses>=0.7.4pragma-sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests-mock>=1.11.0pragma-sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.7.4pragma-sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv>=1.0.0pragma-sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0.1pragma-sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIredis>=5.0.7pragma-sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIwebsockets>=14.0pragma-sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIgrpcio-tools>=1.60.0,<1.71.0pragma-sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.7.4pragma-utils/pyproject.toml
PyPIboto3>=1.28.61pragma-utils/pyproject.toml
PyPImoto>=4.2.5pragma-utils/pyproject.toml
PyPIgoogle-cloud-secret-manager>=2.23.1pragma-utils/pyproject.toml
PyPIpragma-sdk—price-pusher/pyproject.toml
PyPIpragma-utils—price-pusher/pyproject.toml
PyPIclick>=8.1.0price-pusher/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.7.4price-pusher/pyproject.toml
PyPIasgiref>=3.4.1price-pusher/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp>=3.9.0price-pusher/pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi>=0.104.0price-pusher/pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.24.0price-pusher/pyproject.toml
PyPIprometheus-client>=0.20price-pusher/pyproject.toml
PyPIpragma-sdk—vrf-listener/pyproject.toml
PyPIpragma-utils—vrf-listener/pyproject.toml
PyPIclick>=8.1.0vrf-listener/pyproject.toml
PyPItypes-pyyaml>=6.0.12.20240311vrf-listener/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.7.4vrf-listener/pyproject.toml
PyPIapibara==0.8.0vrf-listener/pyproject.toml
PyPIpymongo==4.8.0vrf-listener/pyproject.toml
PyPIasgiref>=3.8.0vrf-listener/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 207

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 32 direct and 175 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaiohttp3.13.0direct
PyPIaioresponses0.7.8direct
PyPIapibara0.8.0direct
PyPIasgiref3.10.0direct
PyPIboto31.40.53direct
PyPIclick8.3.0direct
PyPIdeprecated1.2.18direct
PyPIfastapi0.119.0direct
PyPIfaucon-py0.1.2direct
PyPIgoogle-cloud-secret-manager2.25.0direct
PyPIgrpcio-tools1.62.3direct
PyPIgrpcio-tools1.70.0direct
PyPImoto5.1.14direct
PyPIpragma-sdk—direct
PyPIprometheus-client0.26.0direct
PyPIprotobuf—direct
PyPIprotobuf4.25.8direct
PyPIprotobuf5.29.5direct
PyPIprotobuf6.33.0direct
PyPIpydantic2.12.2direct
PyPIpymongo4.8.0direct
PyPIpython-dotenv—direct
PyPIpython-dotenv1.1.1direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIquickfix-py—direct
PyPIredis6.4.0direct
PyPIrequests-mock1.12.1direct
PyPIstarknet-py0.30.0direct
PyPItyper0.6.1direct
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20250915direct
PyPIuvicorn0.37.0direct
PyPIwebsockets15.0.1direct
PyPIaccessible-pygments0.0.5indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.1indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.11.0indirect
PyPIapeye1.4.1indirect
PyPIapeye-core1.1.5indirect
PyPIargcomplete3.6.2indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs25.4.0indirect
PyPIautodocsumm0.2.14indirect
PyPIbabel2.17.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.14.2indirect
PyPIbotocore1.40.53indirect
PyPIcachecontrol0.14.3indirect
PyPIcachetools6.2.1indirect
PyPIcertifi2025.10.5indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.4.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.4indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcommitizen4.9.1indirect
PyPIcoverage7.11.0indirect
PyPIcoverage7.13.3indirect
PyPIcrypto-cpp-py2.0.0indirect
PyPIcryptography46.0.3indirect
PyPIcssutils2.11.1indirect
PyPIcytoolz1.0.1indirect
PyPIdecli0.6.3indirect
PyPIdict2css0.3.0.post1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIdnspython2.8.0indirect
PyPIdocker7.1.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.21.2indirect
PyPIdomdf-python-tools3.10.0indirect
PyPIdunamai1.25.0indirect
PyPIecdsa0.19.2indirect
PyPIenum-tools0.13.0indirect
PyPIeth-hash0.7.1indirect
PyPIeth-keyfile0.9.1indirect
PyPIeth-keys0.7.0indirect
PyPIeth-typing5.2.1indirect
PyPIeth-utils5.3.1indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.1indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIfakeredis2.32.0indirect
PyPIfilelock3.20.0indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIfuro2025.9.25indirect
PyPIgoogle-api-core2.26.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth2.41.1indirect
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos1.70.0indirect
PyPIgrpc-google-iam-v10.14.3indirect
PyPIgrpcio1.75.1indirect
PyPIgrpcio-status1.62.3indirect
PyPIgrpcio-status1.71.2indirect
PyPIgrpcio-status1.75.1indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhiredis3.3.0indirect
PyPIhtml5lib1.1indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.15indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIimagesize1.4.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.1.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjmespath1.0.1indirect
PyPIjsonpath-ng1.7.0indirect
PyPIlark1.3.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.7.8indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImarshmallow3.26.1indirect
PyPImarshmallow-dataclass8.7.1indirect
PyPImarshmallow-oneofschema3.2.0indirect
PyPImore-itertools10.8.0indirect
PyPImpmath1.3.0indirect
PyPImsgpack1.1.2indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.0indirect
PyPImypy1.18.2indirect
PyPImypy1.19.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInatsort8.4.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.9.1indirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIpallets-sphinx-themes2.3.0indirect
PyPIpastel0.2.1indirect
PyPIpathspec0.12.1indirect
PyPIpathspec1.0.4indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.5.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIply3.11indirect
PyPIpm-publisher0.1.0a13indirect
PyPIpoethepoet0.37.0indirect
PyPIpoethepoet0.40.0indirect
PyPIposeidon-py0.2.0indirect
PyPIpragma-monorepo2.3.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.3.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.51indirect
PyPIpropcache0.4.1indirect
PyPIproto-plus1.26.1indirect
PyPIpy-ecc8.0.0indirect
PyPIpy-partiql-parser0.6.1indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.1indirect
PyPIpyasn1-modules0.4.2indirect
PyPIpycparser2.23indirect
PyPIpycryptodome3.23.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.4indirect
PyPIpygments2.19.2indirect
PyPIpytest8.4.2indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.2indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.2.0indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.3.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.0.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.15.1indirect
PyPIpytest-rerunfailures16.1indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpywin32311indirect
PyPIquestionary2.1.1indirect
PyPIrequests2.32.5indirect
PyPIresponses0.25.8indirect
PyPIroman-numerals-py3.1.0indirect
PyPIrsa4.9.1indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml0.18.15indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml-clib0.2.14indirect
PyPIruff0.14.1indirect
PyPIruff0.15.0indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.14.0indirect
PyPIsemver3.1.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools80.9.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.0.1indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.8indirect
PyPIsphinx8.2.3indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints3.5.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-basic-ng1.0.0b2indirect
PyPIsphinx-jinja2-compat0.4.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-notfound-page1.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-prompt1.9.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-tabs3.4.5indirect
PyPIsphinx-toolbox4.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIstarlette0.48.0indirect
PyPIsympy1.14.0indirect
PyPItabulate0.9.0indirect
PyPItermcolor3.1.0indirect
PyPItestcontainers4.13.2indirect
PyPItomli2.3.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.0indirect
PyPItomlkit0.13.3indirect
PyPItoolz1.0.0indirect
PyPItypeguard4.4.4indirect
PyPItypes-deprecated1.2.15.20250304indirect
PyPItypes-deprecated1.3.1.20260130indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.32.4.20250913indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.32.4.20260107indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspect0.9.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.5.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv20.35.3indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.2.14indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIwerkzeug3.1.3indirect
PyPIwrapt1.17.3indirect
PyPIxmltodict1.0.2indirect
PyPIyarl1.22.0indirect
Dependency advisories 25

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 203 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 25 carry known advisories, of which 6 are direct. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
aiohttp3.13.0directcritical673.14.4
anyio4.11.0indirectcritical44.14.2
cryptography46.0.3indirectcritical1350.0.0
protobuf4.25.8directhigh26.33.5
protobuf5.29.5directhigh26.33.5
protobuf6.33.0directhigh26.33.5
pymongo4.8.0directhigh84.18.2
ecdsa0.19.2indirecthigh2—
msgpack1.1.2indirecthigh21.2.1
pyasn10.6.1indirecthigh100.6.4
soupsieve2.8indirecthigh82.9.0
starlette0.48.0indirecthigh121.3.1
urllib32.5.0indirecthigh122.8.0
virtualenv20.35.3indirecthigh1021.7.13
python-dotenv1.1.1directmoderate21.2.2
filelock3.20.0indirectmoderate43.20.3
idna3.11indirectmoderate23.15
marshmallow3.26.1indirectmoderate24.1.2
multidict6.7.0indirectmoderate26.9.1
pytest8.4.2indirectmoderate29.0.3
pytest9.0.2indirectmoderate29.0.3
requests2.32.5indirectmoderate22.33.0
setuptools80.9.0indirectmoderate283.0.0
werkzeug3.1.3indirectmoderate83.1.9
pygments2.19.2indirectlow22.20.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with astraly-labs/pragma-sdk. Read them side by side →

100aws/aws-sam-cliCLI tool to build, test, debug, and deploy Serverless applications using AWS SAMExceptional100psf/blackThe uncompromising Python code formatterExceptional100optuna/optunaA hyperparameter optimization frameworkExceptional100matplotlib/matplotlibmatplotlib: plotting with PythonExceptional100huggingface/transformers🤗 Transformers: the model-definition framework for state-of-the-art machine learning models in text, vision, audio, and multimodal models, for both inference and training. Exceptional100streamlit/streamlitStreamlit — A faster way to build and share data apps.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.