Public record
Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 11:58 UTC

auth0 / ruby-auth0

Ruby toolkit for Auth0 API

RubyMIT★ 205 stars⑂ 146 forkssince Jun 2014View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#dx-sdk#ruby#authentication

auth0/ruby-auth0 holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (94/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (53/100). It was last updated today. 6 contributors account for most of its recent work.

96
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

96
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 83 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Auth0Organization
2,082 followers339 public repossince Nov 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsauth05.20.0-670 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

83Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
19.4/36Commit cadence — 28/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 183 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year183
human_commit_share0.82
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year28

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 47 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~87.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count47
latest_release_tagv6.0.0.beta.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases87.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

82Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

67Good
How it's scored
37.5/60Stars — 205 stars
18/25Forks — 146 forks
11.1/15Watchers — 100 watchers
Inputs used
forks146
stars205
watchers100
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

90Excellent
How it's scored
71.8/80Total downloads — 8,200,045 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesauth0
dependents—
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads8,200,045
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

94Exceptional · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

90Excellent
How it's scored
48.6/54Bus factor — 6 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 19% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 93 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 27 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor6
contributors_sampled93
top_contributor_share0.187

Issue & PR responsiveness

90Excellent
How it's scored
39.4/42Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
23.7/30PR acceptance — 518/657 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs518
open_issues6
closed_issues90
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.938
closed_unmerged_prs139
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

99Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
23.9/25Owner reach — 2,082 followers of auth0
25/25Track record — 339 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,082
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginauth0
public_repos339
account_age_days4,994
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 67 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesauth0
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://auth0.com/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdx-sdk, ruby, authentication
has_wikino
homepagehttps://auth0.com/
docs_sitehttps://auth0.com/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

77Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

71Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 27 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate7.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories5
affected_packages2
assessed_packages93
unassessed_packages26
affected_by_severityhigh 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 93 resolved dependencies against OSV. 26 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

31At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
31.2/40Legible commit history — 48 of 82 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.585
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

52Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 18 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.18

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/132 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes31,597
source_files_sampled132
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

205GitHub stars
93contributors
183commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
47releases
6bus factor
6open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 146 ⇿
0Stars
146Forks
46Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012515014342014-082020-082026-07
Major 1Minor 35Patch 6

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.1 / 10
7.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 11:58 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 27 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 119

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 119 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsactivesupport8.1.3indirect
RubyGemsaddressable—indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.3indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.1.2indirect
RubyGemsbundler—indirect
RubyGemscoderay1.1.3indirect
RubyGemscoffee-rails—indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.6indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool3.0.2indirect
RubyGemscrack1.0.1indirect
RubyGemsdiff-lcs1.6.2indirect
RubyGemsdocile1.4.1indirect
RubyGemsdomain_name0.6.20240107indirect
RubyGemsdotenv—indirect
RubyGemsdotenv2.8.1indirect
RubyGemsdotenv3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsdotenv-rails—indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.3indirect
RubyGemsfaker—indirect
RubyGemsfaker2.23.0indirect
RubyGemsffi1.17.4indirect
RubyGemsformatador1.2.3indirect
RubyGemsfuubar—indirect
RubyGemsfuubar2.5.1indirect
RubyGemsguard2.20.1indirect
RubyGemsguard-compat1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsguard-rspec4.7.3indirect
RubyGemshashdiff1.2.1indirect
RubyGemshttp-accept1.7.0indirect
RubyGemshttp-cookie1.1.6indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.14.8indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.8.2indirect
RubyGemsjbuilder—indirect
RubyGemsjquery-rails—indirect
RubyGemsjson2.19.7indirect
RubyGemsjwt—indirect
RubyGemsjwt3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsknock—indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.5indirect
RubyGemslint_roller1.1.0indirect
RubyGemslisten3.10.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemslumberjack1.4.2indirect
RubyGemsmethod_source1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsmime-types3.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmime-types-data3.2026.0414indirect
RubyGemsminitest6.0.6indirect
RubyGemsmustermann3.0.4indirect
RubyGemsnenv0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsnetrc0.11.0indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.7.3indirect
RubyGemsnotiffany0.1.3indirect
RubyGemsparallel2.1.0indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.11.1indirect
RubyGemspg—indirect
RubyGemspp0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsprettyprint0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsprism1.9.0indirect
RubyGemspry—indirect
RubyGemspry0.16.0indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.5indirect
RubyGemspuma5.6.9indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrack3.2.6indirect
RubyGemsrack-protection4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrack-session2.1.2indirect
RubyGemsrails5.0.0.1indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrake—indirect
RubyGemsrake13.4.2indirect
RubyGemsrb-fsevent0.11.2indirect
RubyGemsrb-inotify0.11.1indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.12.0indirect
RubyGemsreline0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsrest-client—indirect
RubyGemsrest-client2.1.0indirect
RubyGemsretryable—indirect
RubyGemsretryable3.0.5indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsrspec—indirect
RubyGemsrspec3.13.2indirect
RubyGemsrspec-core3.13.6indirect
RubyGemsrspec-expectations3.13.5indirect
RubyGemsrspec-mocks3.13.8indirect
RubyGemsrspec-support3.13.7indirect
RubyGemsrubocop1.86.2indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.49.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rails2.35.3indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemsruby2_keywords0.0.5indirect
RubyGemssass-rails—indirect
RubyGemssdoc—indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.4.1indirect
RubyGemsshellany0.0.1indirect
RubyGemssimplecov—indirect
RubyGemssimplecov0.22.0indirect
RubyGemssimplecov-cobertura3.1.0indirect
RubyGemssimplecov-html0.13.2indirect
RubyGemssimplecov_json_formatter0.1.4indirect
RubyGemssinatra4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsspring—indirect
RubyGemssqlite3—indirect
RubyGemsterminal-notifier-guard1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsthor1.5.0indirect
RubyGemstilt2.7.0indirect
RubyGemstimecop0.9.11indirect
RubyGemsturbolinks—indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemstzinfo-data—indirect
RubyGemsuglifier—indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode-emoji4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsuri1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsvcr6.4.0indirect
RubyGemswebmock3.26.2indirect
RubyGemszache—indirect
RubyGemszache0.15.2indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 93 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 26 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
concurrent-ruby1.3.6indirecthigh31.3.7
puma5.6.9indirecthigh28.0.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with auth0/ruby-auth0. Read them side by side →

98auth0/nextjs-auth0Next.js SDK for signing in with Auth0Exceptional98auth0/auth0-reactAuth0 SDK for React Single Page Applications (SPA)Exceptional96auth0/auth0.jsAuth0 headless browser sdkExceptional96auth0/auth0.net.NET client for the Auth0 Authentication & Management APIs.Exceptional96auth0/auth0-angularAuth0 SDK for Angular Single Page ApplicationsExceptional96auth0/node-auth0Node.js client library for the Auth0 platform.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.