Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 04:36 UTC

aws / aws-sdk-php

Official repository of the AWS SDK for PHP (@awsforphp)

PHPApache-2.0★ 6,207 stars⑂ 1,252 forkssince Oct 2012View on GitHub ↗

aws/aws-sdk-php holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (49/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 81 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Amazon Web ServicesOrganization · verified domain
17,198 followers559 public repossince Aug 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistaws/aws-sdk-php3.401.216,719,6622,5425 days agoamazons3sdkcloudawsdynamodbec2glacier

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 599 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year599
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag3.401.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases2.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

96Exceptional · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 6,207 stars
25/25Forks — 1,252 forks
12.8/15Watchers — 203 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,252
stars6,207
watchers203
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 16,719,662 downloads/month across packagist
20/20Registry dependents — 2,590 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesaws/aws-sdk-php
dependents2,590
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads594,042,023
monthly_downloads16,719,662
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

83Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 47% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 38 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.471
How it's scored
41.5/42Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
24.5/30PR acceptance — 1,331/1,630 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs1,331
open_issues20
closed_issues1,621
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d6
prs_decided_30d7
issue_closed_ratio0.988
closed_unmerged_prs299
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 17,198 followers of aws
25/25Track record — 559 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers17,198
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginaws
public_repos559
account_age_days5,165

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history — 2,542 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesaws/aws-sdk-php
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 13 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — http://aws.amazon.com/sdkforphp
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttp://aws.amazon.com/sdkforphp
docs_sitehttp://aws.amazon.com/sdkforphp
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 4/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 38 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
1.5/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 3
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate6.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

49Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/llms.txt)
12/40Legible commit history — 22 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.aws.amazon.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.224
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
48.7/55Manageable file sizes — 599/5,213 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes2,919,276
source_files_sampled5,213
oversized_source_files599

Key facts

6,207GitHub stars
99contributors
599commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
20open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,252 ⇿
0Stars
1,252Forks
93Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

2004006008001,0001,2001,4001,25292015-022020-122026-10
Major 0Minor 17Patch 76

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 04:35 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 4/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 38 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
3SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 3
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle^7.8.2 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr7^2.6.3 || ^3.0composer.json
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises^2.0.3 || ^3.0composer.json
Packagistmtdowling/jmespath.php^2.9.1composer.json
Packagistaws/aws-crt-php^1.2.3composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-message^1.0 || ^2.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/filesystem^v5.4.45 || ^v6.4.3 || ^v7.1.0 || ^v8.0.0composer.json
All dependencies 25

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 18 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistaws/aws-crt-php—direct
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle—direct
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises—direct
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr7—direct
Packagistmtdowling/jmespath.php—direct
Packagistpsr/http-message—direct
Packagistsymfony/filesystem—direct
Packagistandrewsville/php-token-reflection—indirect
Packagistaws/aws-php-sns-message-validator—indirect
Packagistbehat/behat—indirect
Packagistcomposer/composer—indirect
Packagistdms/phpunit-arraysubset-asserts—indirect
Packagistdoctrine/cache—indirect
Packagistext-dom—indirect
Packagistext-json—indirect
Packagistext-openssl—indirect
Packagistext-pcre—indirect
Packagistext-simplexml—indirect
Packagistext-sockets—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Packagistpsr/cache—indirect
Packagistpsr/simple-cache—indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator—indirect
Packagistyoast/phpunit-polyfills—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.