Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 01:52 UTC

getmoto / moto

A library that allows you to easily mock out tests based on AWS infrastructure.

PythonApache-2.0★ 8,628 stars⑂ 2,242 forkssince Feb 2013View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

getmoto/moto holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Security (65/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

96
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

96
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 84 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MotoOrganization
54 followers4 public repossince Jan 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPImoto5.2.346,794,1761,0225 days agoawsec2s3boto3mock

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume903 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year903
human_commit_share0.63
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases71 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 5 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~30.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count71
latest_release_tag5.2.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases30.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

96Exceptional · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars8,628 stars
25/25Forks2,242 forks
10/15Watchers65 watchers
Inputs used
forks2,242
stars8,628
watchers65
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

93Exceptional
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges8
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, opencollective.com, readthedocs.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads46,794,176 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesmoto
dependents
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads
monthly_downloads46,794,176
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 30% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 30 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.296
How it's scored
41.6/42Issue resolution99% of issues closed
27.6/30PR acceptance6,303/6,853 decided PRs merged
10/13Newcomer PR acceptance10/13 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 21/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs6,303
open_issues33
closed_issues3,252
prs_merged_7d10
prs_decided_7d13
prs_merged_30d37
prs_decided_30d45
issue_closed_ratio0.99
closed_unmerged_prs550
first_time_authors_30d8
first_time_prs_merged_30d10
first_time_prs_decided_30d13
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
12.5/25Owner reach54 followers of getmoto
12.4/25Track record4 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers54
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logingetmoto
public_repos4
account_age_days1,332

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history1,022 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmoto
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

89Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows32 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configpyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests27 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttp://docs.getmoto.org/en/latest/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsboto, aws, ec2, s3
has_wikiyes
homepagehttp://docs.getmoto.org/en/latest/
docs_sitehttp://docs.getmoto.org/en/latest/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

65Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests27 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 21/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 30 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
3.5/5SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate5.6

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages19
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:moto@5.2.3 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 19 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history49 of 63 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.778
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile, docs/Makefile, other_langs/tests_cpp/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configpyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checkingmoto/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environmentdevcontainer, Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance17 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, docs/Makefile, other_langs/tests_cpp/Makefile
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsmoto/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsother_langs/tests_dotnet/ebs/ElasticBlockStore.csproj, other_langs/tests_dotnet/s3/s3.csproj, other_langs/tests_dotnet/sqs/sqs.csproj, other_langs/tests_go/go.mod, other_langs/tests_java/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.17
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codePython with type-check config (moto/py.typed)
53.7/55Manageable file sizes59/2,579 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes4,266,904
source_files_sampled2,579
oversized_source_files59

Key facts

8,628GitHub stars
98contributors
903commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
71releases
2bus factor
33open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 27 authors (cap 12)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2,242 ⇿
0Stars
2,242Forks
70Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

1,0001,2501,5001,7502,0002,2502,24292021-042023-122026-08
Major 1Minor 2Patch 64

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 01:51 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
9CI-Tests27 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 21/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 30 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
7SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIboto3>=1.9.201setup.cfg
PyPIbotocore>=1.20.88,!=1.35.45,!=1.35.46setup.cfg
PyPIcryptography>=35.0.0setup.cfg
PyPIrequests>=2.5setup.cfg
PyPIxmltodictsetup.cfg
PyPIwerkzeug>=0.5,!=2.2.0,!=2.2.1setup.cfg
PyPIresponses>=0.15.0,!= 0.25.5setup.cfg
All dependencies 82

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 81 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIrequestsdirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.43.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.32.33indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.19.32indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/ec2/imdsv1.18.33indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsourcesv1.4.33indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2v2.7.33indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/v4av1.4.34indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/dynamodbv1.62.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/dynamodbstreamsv1.36.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/eksv1.90.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encodingv1.13.14indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/endpoint-discoveryv1.12.10indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-urlv1.13.33indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/signinv1.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssov1.33.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssooidcv1.38.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/stsv1.45.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.27.5indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter6.1.2indirect
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk.crt:aws-crt0.48.2indirect
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:apache-clientindirect
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:bom2.49.6indirect
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:cognitoidentityindirect
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:cognitoidentityproviderindirect
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:dynamodbindirect
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:kinesisindirect
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:s3indirect
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:s3-transfer-managerindirect
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:sesindirect
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:url-connection-clientindirect
npm@aws-sdk/client-ec2^3.749.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/client-lambda^3.749.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/client-rds^3.749.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/client-s3^3.749.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/client-sqs^3.749.0indirect
NuGetAWSSDK.EBS3.7.100.153indirect
NuGetAWSSDK.S3indirect
NuGetAWSSDK.SQSindirect
NuGetFluentAssertions6.8.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.UserSecrets7.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.1.0indirect
NuGetxunit2.4.1indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.4.3indirect
PyPIaws-cdk-lib2.253.0indirect
PyPIbotocore-stubsindirect
PyPIbuildindirect
PyPIclickindirect
PyPIconstructsindirect
PyPIcookiesindirect
PyPIcoverageindirect
PyPIdockerindirect
PyPIflake8indirect
PyPIfreezegunindirect
PyPIinflectionindirect
PyPIjinja2indirect
PyPIjoserfcindirect
PyPIlxmlindirect
PyPImypyindirect
PyPIopenapi-spec-validatorindirect
PyPIpackagingindirect
PyPIprompt-toolkitindirect
PyPIpycognitoindirect
PyPIpyotpindirect
PyPIpytestindirect
PyPIpytest-covindirect
PyPIpytest-orderindirect
PyPIpytest-xdistindirect
PyPIpyyamlindirect
PyPIreadthedocs-sphinx-searchindirect
PyPIruff0.14.10indirect
PyPIsetuptoolsindirect
PyPIsixindirect
PyPIsphinxindirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-themeindirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutilindirect
PyPItypes-pyyamlindirect
PyPItypes-requestsindirect
PyPItyping-extensionsindirect
RubyGemsaws-sdk-sqs1.70.0indirect
RubyGemsminitestindirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:moto@5.2.3 pulls in 19 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.